CORNERED: Judge Orders Trump To Testify Under Oath Over Remarks About Immigrants

[Picaro]

Donald Trump Must Give Testimony Under Oath In Restaurant Suit, Judge Rules

The president-elect had tried to get away with not testifying, even though he himself brought the lawsuit.

WASHINGTON ― A judge has ordered Republican President-elect Donald Trump to give a deposition in a lawsuit against celebrity chef Jose Andres stemming from Trump’s disparaging remarks about Mexican immigrants.

District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro ruled on Wednesday that Trump must testify in New York about Andres’ restaurant deal at Trump’s luxury Washington hotel. The deposition can last up to seven hours and will take place in the first week of January.

His lawyers had sought to limit how long Trump could be questioned and what could be covered, contending he was extremely busy ahead of his Jan. 20 inauguration.

But Di Toro said in her order that limits on the deposition could harm preparations by Andres’ lawyers, and that Trump’s own statements were at the heart of the case.

Trump is suing Andres for $10 million over breach of contract after Andres backed out of a plan to open a restaurant in the Trump International Hotel a few blocks from the White House.

Andres, who was born in Spain and is a naturalized U.S. citizen, has said he canceled the project after Trump denounced Mexican immigrants in June 2015 as drug dealers and rapists.

Andres has argued that the comments made it difficult to attract Hispanic staff and customers and to raise money for a Spanish restaurant.

Trump’s transition team did not respond to a request for comment.

CORNERED: Judge Orders Trump To Testify Over Remarks About Immigrants

Trump under oath! Sounds good. District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro.

Andres broke a contract and this judge is abusing his position.

Trump's statements are irrelevant. Fucking liberal judges.

It's a her. Di Toro is the first married LGBT individual with children who has been approved by the Senate to serve the judiciary.[3]

Jennifer Di Toro - Ballotpedia

Yes, we know it is some degenerate Democrat appointee abusing their office and judicial powers and grandstanding. The entire claim is bogus, merely more harassment, and we have Trump's own words to document what he said. She's just another hack that needs to resign or face impeachment, as well as deportation along with the rest of the non-Americans infesting the country.

 

[OKTexas]

no one cares.trump blatantly lied his ass off and was elected anyway. anything goes.

Exactly! Trump has proven that rules, facts and ethics no longer apply.

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

no one cares.trump blatantly lied his ass off and was elected anyway. anything goes.

Seriously, why, why, why,, OH WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYY cant Trump just be honest like the Clintons.

 

[Lewdog]

no one cares.trump blatantly lied his ass off and was elected anyway. anything goes.

Exactly! Trump has proven that rules, facts and ethics no longer apply.

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

 

[rdean]

So a Spaniard who legally came to the US is suing Trump for saying something about Mexican illegals and broke a contract to be a chef in a high end eatery.

Only in lib land does this make Trump the bad person.

Don't be a fucking idiot. This is what Trump said:

When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people," he said.

Where are illegals mentioned? And it says "WHEN MEXICO SENDS IT'S PEOPLE". Clearly, he is saying the entire country of Mexico is somehow attacking us. Duh! You have to explain even the most obvious to these people. They only hear what they want. Not what's "right there".

 

[rdean]

no one cares.trump blatantly lied his ass off and was elected anyway. anything goes.

Exactly! Trump has proven that rules, facts and ethics no longer apply.

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

Republicans call that good business.

 

[OKTexas]

no one cares.trump blatantly lied his ass off and was elected anyway. anything goes.

Exactly! Trump has proven that rules, facts and ethics no longer apply.

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

Care to provide examples?

 

[Lewdog]

no one cares.trump blatantly lied his ass off and was elected anyway. anything goes.

Exactly! Trump has proven that rules, facts and ethics no longer apply.

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

Care to provide examples?

Oh for fucks sake, why would I go through the trouble of giving you a list just so you can say, "Well they probably didn't do a good enough job to deserve getting paid so Trump was justified!"

You're obviously biased, so it would be a waste of time.

 

[OKTexas]

no one cares.trump blatantly lied his ass off and was elected anyway. anything goes.

Exactly! Trump has proven that rules, facts and ethics no longer apply.

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

Care to provide examples?

Oh for fucks sake, why would I go through the trouble of giving you a list just so you can say, "Well they probably didn't do a good enough job to deserve getting paid so Trump was justified!"

You're obviously biased, so it would be a waste of time.

Are you in the habit of paying people who do substandard work?

 

[Picaro]

So a Spaniard who legally came to the US is suing Trump for saying something about Mexican illegals and broke a contract to be a chef in a high end eatery.

Only in lib land does this make Trump the bad person.

Don't be a fucking idiot. This is what Trump said:

When Mexico sends it's people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people," he said.

Where are illegals mentioned? And it says "WHEN MEXICO SENDS IT'S PEOPLE". Clearly, he is saying the entire country of Mexico is somehow attacking us. Duh! You have to explain even the most obvious to these people. They only hear what they want. Not what's "right there".

I agree; you shouldn't be such a fucking idiot, but you are.

 

[Picaro]

In other news, looking at her bio, she doesn't have any experience worth mentioning, just being female, having an Hispanic surname, and having a mental disorder is more than enough for Obama, apparently. Her resume is interesting, the only private employment being with a firm that specializes in defending white collar criminals and whining College administrators and the like, mostly rich people suing each other, of course.

Zuckerman Spaeder : Articles :: Law360

They just hired Obama's buddy who ran Health and in turn whom Obama hired from the same firm ... lol

William B. Schultz joined Zuckerman’s D.C. office this week after serving as general counsel for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from March 2011 to June 2016. Schultz practiced at Zuckerman for 10 years prior to his run at HHS, and he told Law360 on...

Zuckerman Spaeder Nabs Obama's Ex-Top Health Atty - Law360

Didn't go past the first page, so there's probably a lot more enlightenment to be had on how and where the Democrats find all those 'progressives' and 'liberals' to appoint.

Isn't it nice to have a lot of former employees sitting on benches and running Federal bureaucracies?

Why, yes, it is ...

Philip Morris Can't Boot Judge From FDA Labeling Suit - Law360

 

[Picaro]

lol ... off-topic but this is one of the more bizarre cases.

Ex-JPMorgan Adviser Ordered To Pay $27M In Restitution - Law360

Clearly a case of the pot calling the kettle black if there ever was one. Hilarious. This is Onion material.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Guess what, Spain isn't Mexico.
Most nothing post you've made in a while.

 

[Lewdog]

Exactly! Trump has proven that rules, facts and ethics no longer apply.

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

Care to provide examples?

Oh for fucks sake, why would I go through the trouble of giving you a list just so you can say, "Well they probably didn't do a good enough job to deserve getting paid so Trump was justified!"

You're obviously biased, so it would be a waste of time.

Are you in the habit of paying people who do substandard work?

But who is to say it was actually substandard work? If I was a contractor, never in a million years would I ever do a job for Trump. A couple of guys get screwed out of a contract... ok. Hundreds? Nope... that's bullshit.

 

[Picaro]

Guess what, Spain isn't Mexico.
Most nothing post you've made in a while.

Guess what? Most don't know that, and neither do most latinos, as long as the last name is hispanic it works the same, it's about 'Diversity N Stuff'.

 

[OKTexas]

Ethics? Ethics is honoring a contract.

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

Care to provide examples?

Oh for fucks sake, why would I go through the trouble of giving you a list just so you can say, "Well they probably didn't do a good enough job to deserve getting paid so Trump was justified!"

You're obviously biased, so it would be a waste of time.

Are you in the habit of paying people who do substandard work?

But who is to say it was actually substandard work? If I was a contractor, never in a million years would I ever do a job for Trump. A couple of guys get screwed out of a contract... ok. Hundreds? Nope... that's bullshit.

The customer decides is the job is satisfactory or not, if the contractor disagrees that's what the courts are for. Trump has likely dealt hundreds of thousands of contractors in his 40+ career a few hundred disputes would not be uncommon. Most people can't comprehend the scale of his various businesses.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Guess what, Spain isn't Mexico.
Most nothing post you've made in a while.

Guess what? Most don't know that, and neither do most latinos, as long as the last name is hispanic it works the same, it's about 'Diversity N Stuff'.

A lot of native born Americans and many other nationalities have Hispanic surnames; doesn't make them Mexican either. It's actually Bullspit N Stuff. I have a German last name; still can't speak Kraut.

 

[Lewdog]

So you are saying Trump is unethical since he has fucked people in MANY contracts?

Care to provide examples?

Oh for fucks sake, why would I go through the trouble of giving you a list just so you can say, "Well they probably didn't do a good enough job to deserve getting paid so Trump was justified!"

You're obviously biased, so it would be a waste of time.

Are you in the habit of paying people who do substandard work?

But who is to say it was actually substandard work? If I was a contractor, never in a million years would I ever do a job for Trump. A couple of guys get screwed out of a contract... ok. Hundreds? Nope... that's bullshit.

The customer decides is the job is satisfactory or not, if the contractor disagrees that's what the courts are for. Trump has likely dealt hundreds of thousands of contractors in his 40+ career a few hundred disputes would not be uncommon. Most people can't comprehend the scale of his various businesses.

And Trump has deep enough pockets to beat contractors in court and has bragged about it. So what's your point? Trump cheats hard working men out of money and beats them in court... and that's ok with you. As I said, a handful of contractors do sub-par work and get stiffed, I get it. Hundreds? Nope, that's a sign that Trump likes to cheat people out of money.

 

[Yarddog]

Donald Trump Must Give Testimony Under Oath In Restaurant Suit, Judge Rules

The president-elect had tried to get away with not testifying, even though he himself brought the lawsuit.

WASHINGTON ― A judge has ordered Republican President-elect Donald Trump to give a deposition in a lawsuit against celebrity chef Jose Andres stemming from Trump’s disparaging remarks about Mexican immigrants.

District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro ruled on Wednesday that Trump must testify in New York about Andres’ restaurant deal at Trump’s luxury Washington hotel. The deposition can last up to seven hours and will take place in the first week of January.

His lawyers had sought to limit how long Trump could be questioned and what could be covered, contending he was extremely busy ahead of his Jan. 20 inauguration.

But Di Toro said in her order that limits on the deposition could harm preparations by Andres’ lawyers, and that Trump’s own statements were at the heart of the case.

Trump is suing Andres for $10 million over breach of contract after Andres backed out of a plan to open a restaurant in the Trump International Hotel a few blocks from the White House.

Andres, who was born in Spain and is a naturalized U.S. citizen, has said he canceled the project after Trump denounced Mexican immigrants in June 2015 as drug dealers and rapists.

Andres has argued that the comments made it difficult to attract Hispanic staff and customers and to raise money for a Spanish restaurant.

Trump’s transition team did not respond to a request for comment.

CORNERED: Judge Orders Trump To Testify Over Remarks About Immigrants

Trump under oath! Sounds good. District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro.

To Bad Andres like most Liberals didnt realize Trump was not talking about all Mexicans. Just the bad ones who are commiting these crimes. Why are those crimes any different than the same crimes commited by natural born citizens? It's because those crimes could have been preventable with a little more effort in Immigration policy.
So far I've seen a lot of CRYing over what someone has said and they havnt done a damn thing yet in office.
Grow up you think?

 

[OKTexas]

Care to provide examples?

Oh for fucks sake, why would I go through the trouble of giving you a list just so you can say, "Well they probably didn't do a good enough job to deserve getting paid so Trump was justified!"

You're obviously biased, so it would be a waste of time.

Are you in the habit of paying people who do substandard work?

But who is to say it was actually substandard work? If I was a contractor, never in a million years would I ever do a job for Trump. A couple of guys get screwed out of a contract... ok. Hundreds? Nope... that's bullshit.

The customer decides is the job is satisfactory or not, if the contractor disagrees that's what the courts are for. Trump has likely dealt hundreds of thousands of contractors in his 40+ career a few hundred disputes would not be uncommon. Most people can't comprehend the scale of his various businesses.

And Trump has deep enough pockets to beat contractors in court and has bragged about it. So what's your point? Trump cheats hard working men out of money and beats them in court... and that's ok with you. As I said, a handful of contractors do sub-par work and get stiffed, I get it. Hundreds? Nope, that's a sign that Trump likes to cheat people out of money.

If Trump proves his case in court, who the hell are you to question the fairness of the judicial process? All I can say is your partisan hackery is showing.