Cornell invites Jew-hater to entertain

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seems like the Ivies are really fighting AGAINST the attempt to ratchet down the antisemitism on campus. Now Cornell has invited a singer to perform who has bashed Jews, sings out “Long Live the Intifada!,” and shows a map where Israel has be eliminated from the planet.

Clearly, the safety and well-being of Jewish students at Cornell is not a concern.

Given the propensity of the Zionists for 24/7 cry baby propaganda, it's very possible that "antisemitism on campus" is an illusion.
 
O.K.

Educate me. . . with receipts.

Otherwise yoar just shilling bullshit.



Last I heard, no one has amended the constitution.
with "receipts"? I would just recommend that you pickup a first amendment text book. I don't have the one I used in grad school (or the later edition I taught from). You can look up "prior restraint" if you want to start learning. Or are you claiming that 250 years of case law is a lie? American freedom of speech was never absolute (it is fun to read law suits titled things like "US vs. 24 cans of film"). Or do you read the Constitution literally and in a vacuum?
 
Institutions have been "banning" speakers for years. Some crazy guy wanders on campus and says "I want to speak here" and the campus can say "no thanks" for any number of reasons. There is no inherent right to speak wherever you want.
And liberal institutions have refused to invite conservative speakers to represent the opposing viewpoint. Why aren’t the posters on this forum defending ALL of free speech?

They sure didn’t say “free speech!” when they didn’t like the Aunt Jemima logo. They were concerned it was offensive to blacks. But let antisemites scream antisemitic lies and advance more hostility against Jews, and all of a sudden they defend it.

Which brings me back to the point…..it’s only “free speech” when the venom and harm is directed against Jews.
 
Is it anti-semantic to say Israel is an apartheid state?
why "semantic"? It isn't anti-semitic to say that. It is legally and factually incorrect but not anti-semitic.
 
And liberal institutions have refused to invite conservative speakers to represent the opposing viewpoint. Why aren’t the posters on this forum defending ALL of free speech?

They sure didn’t say “free speech!” when they didn’t like the Aunt Jemima logo. They were concerned it was offensive to blacks. But let antisemites scream antisemitic lies and advance more hostility against Jews, and all of a sudden they defend it.

Which brings me back to the point…..it’s only “free speech” when the venom and harm is directed against Jews.
:lol:

giphy.gif
 
Is it anti-semantic to say Israel is an apartheid state?
It’s a lie, and driven by Jew-hate.

Also, “semantic” means something different.
 
Seems like the Ivies are really fighting AGAINST the attempt to ratchet down the antisemitism on campus. Now Cornell has invited a singer to perform who has bashed Jews, sings out “Long Live the Intifada!,” and shows a map where Israel has be eliminated from the planet.

Clearly, the safety and well-being of Jewish students at Cornell is not a concern.

What is with these Ivy league schools?
 
15th post
So the Jew-haters get “free speech,” but a Jew who objects is told to “get help”?

Thanks for showing the double standards, again,
No, everyone gets free speech.


You are as perfectly welcome to post a thread and lobby for the oppression of others, as they are.

9rknjj.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom