Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Whatever eyou may think of Roe, it is settled law.Roe v Wade was a bad ruling. The Constitution does not even mention abortion.
You contradict yourself.A Texas law which ignored it was upheld by the Supreme ct and a direct challenge to it is now before the court.
With limitations placed on government prohibiting the state from interfering in personal, private matters – such as whether to have a child or not.But it is a right, with limitations and responsibilities like any other right.
And yet, you agree the TX abortion law is constitutional.With limitations placed on government prohibiting the state from interfering in personal, private matters – such as whether to have a child or not.
Well you're wrong on every point. I can buy and legally possess anything other than a nuclear weapon, I just have to fill out the paperwork and pay the tax to do so.The guarrantee of freedom of religion does not cover human sacrifice or multiple wives or use of dangerous drugs.
The right to bear arms does not cover bombs or machine guns or flame throwers or artillery. Private citizens may not own fighter jets or missiles.
The right of free speech does not protect Perjury, Obstruction of justice, extortion, obscenity or liable or slander.
These limits set forth in statutes or case law.
You can have as many wives as you want, but only one legally registered with the gov't at a time.I never understood the more than one wife thing.....I mean if you are manly enough and can support them and the multiple children on your own dime then go for it.
Mostly it's a matter of transfer of titles and property.Polygamy was common in the ancient world, but not anymore. I suspect its a morals question.
On what basis would you claim that it is not?And yet, you agree the TX abortion law is constitutional.
The time to decide is before you make a baby.With limitations placed on government prohibiting the state from interfering in personal, private matters – such as whether to have a child or not.
There is no Constitutional right to have an abortion. There is a SCOTUS decision “finding” the right. And sure. It’s right there in invisible ink penumbra clauses.Just like the right to an abortion - it is neither unlimited or absolute, as set forth by Roe v Wade and the cases that followed.
You'll have to ask Clayton.On what basis would you claim that it is not?
So was Dred Scott for a while. Bad case decisions aren’t immune from reconsideration. Seriously. When looked at in that light, the proper question might be: “WTF does ‘settled law’ even mean?” A legal issue got raised. It got litigated and argued. A decision was rendered. I guess it means, “ok, that’s settled., now.”Whatever eyou may think of Roe, it is settled law.
They couldn't find one no matter how far and wide they looked so they simply made it up.There is no Constitutional right to have an abortion. There is a SCOTUS decision “finding” the right. And sure. It’s right there in invisible ink penumbra clauses.
Whatever eyou may think of Roe, it is settled law.
You contradict yourself.
If the USSC upheld the TX abortion ban, then it the TX abortion ban would not be now before the court.
Unless, I suppose, some appeals court overturned the ban and the state appealed to the USSC - in which case, the court would overturn the appeals court.
But that's not the case.
That it is "settled law" mostly comes fro the lips of the left.If it were "settled law" the dem's wouldn't make overturning RvW every time a seat opens up.
Happiness is having a woman who cooks, who cleans, and who fucks like the devil. As long as none of them find out about the others.Yeah, go for it. Just as long as she gets at least one that can cook-n-clean so the rest can go off hunting and what not.
Those penumbra clauses are tricky.They couldn't find one no matter how far and wide they looked so they simply made it up.
As usual another gun grabber that has no idea of what he is talking about.The guarrantee of freedom of religion does not cover human sacrifice or multiple wives or use of dangerous drugs.
The right to bear arms does not cover bombs or machine guns or flame throwers or artillery. Private citizens may not own fighter jets or missiles.
The right of free speech does not protect Perjury, Obstruction of justice, extortion, obscenity or liable or slander.
These limits set forth in statutes or case law.
As usual another gun grabber that has no idea of what he is talking about.
There are machine gun shooting events in our nation.
cannon shooting events.
civilians can own tanks.
and jet fighters.
yes, you can own a flamethrower.
The Constitution doesn't mention lots of things which is the reason for the Ninth AmendmentRoe v Wade was a bad ruling. The Constitution does not even mention abortion. A Texas law which ignored it was upheld by the Supreme ct and a direct challenge to it is now before the court.
