After all of the conservative hand-wringing and predictions of epidemic regarding the two American Christians coming back to the homeland for treatment for the Ebola virus, it turned out that their hysterical, panicky screeching was completely unfounded.
Just like Liberals told them.
What on earth are you synthesizing? Certainly not actual data.
This, from a liberal rag:
Ebola outbreak keeps getting worse 8220 I 8217 m not confident we will be able to stop it 8221 - Salon.com
Is your concern for the victims and inevitable spread of this deadly disease, or simply the focus on your hatred for the Christian volunteers that went there to provide aide??? Seem the latter rather than the former.
Wanna debate your hatred?
Bring it....
False, wingnut. I supported the decision to bring them home to the U.S. All Liberals did.
It's wingnuts like you who were willing to let them die in Africa because of your unfounded fears.
Okay, I will lower myself to your level.
Dipshit, I supported their return.
Only leftwing echo-chambers (which you cited on queue) quoting fringe kooks or fictitious fabrications advocated otherwise. Parsing the real concern of others, for political benefit, is another option. You are arguing with yourself, and using that as an excuse to use ad hominems and avoid the real discussion. Clearly, your only motive here is to besmirch people who make your look bad, rather than focus attention on the medical disaster plaguing the region. How do I know? You speak not of the vitcims, only for those, real or otherwise, expressing MASSIVE concern. If the virus never makes it to your home, you will ridicule endlessly the expression of concern. If it does reach your home, you will use the disaster to justify more government largess. Either way, the lib justifies itself. At the end of the day, your only position is to ridicule. This is classic compensation.
Can we agree that it is pathetic to assume the motives of complete strangers, as you did above?