Who are these "gay conservatives" you speak of?
If I went on safari in Africa, might I spot one?
They exist.
They do exist.
I know one.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who are these "gay conservatives" you speak of?
If I went on safari in Africa, might I spot one?
But, States have reciprocity on the basis of mutual respect.Marriage is not a federal matter anymore than abortion. I was against Roe for that reason and against DOMA as well.
Your opinion, which is like an asshole. Everyone has one and they all stink!Gay marriage is immoral and ultimately will be overturned for that reason. Hopefully, soon.
Speaking of being in the closet.Sorry bout that,
1. No to the, Hell No!
2. Its got to end!
3. Get your fag asses back in the closets.
4. Its decaying our society.
5. Whats more important, society or fags feelings?
6. Sure we tried to see if it would work for many years, now they want the children, I say no.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Traditional marriage has been the cornerstone of society for thousands of years in every major culture and religionGay marriage can't be allowed in a theocracy.
![]()
What happens if the economy tanks or the growth does not keep up with the number of social programs needed and expanded on? It is not small government as much as government not growing as much in a healthy economy.Maybe you small government con-servatives can pass a law forcing people to.
It’s not really comparable. Lots of people, myself included, think two consenting adults can do what they want, and if they want to get married, they hurt nobody.Here's my reasoning: The Obergefell case, making it mandatory for states to recognize gay marriage has little basis in the constitution, I get that. States have always had the power to regulate marriage, with little interference from the federal government. But I am still glad the court decided it that way for two reasons:
1 - as a libertarian, I believe that people should be able to marry who they choose, as long as both adults, or reasonably close. The states would have been very slow in granting that right protection. Yes, I believe marrying the person that you choose is a natural right, and so it would arguably be in the penumbra of rights in the constitution.
2 - If Obergefell is overturned by what I proudly call the Trump court that overturned Roe, the left will have some justification for their claim that the court is being activist by ignoring precedent.
3 - If Obergefell is overturned, many states will recognize same-sex marriage on their own. Then the "full faith and credit" clause will force the most conservative of states to accept marriages licensed in California, just as states with an 18 year old minimum age must accept marriages licensed in states with a 16 year old minimum age.
If Obergefell is overturned, the left gains new ammo. Deep in their leftie hearts, they always knew that abortion rights are not in the constitution. Their anger at the Dobbs decision is not borne of shock, but of the final eventuality of what they knew was coming.
Don't give them ammo, and alienate gay conservatives, which could lead to court stacking that could bring Roe right back.
Here's my reasoning: The Obergefell case, making it mandatory for states to recognize gay marriage has little basis in the constitution, I get that. States have always had the power to regulate marriage, with little interference from the federal government. But I am still glad the court decided it that way for two reasons:
1 - as a libertarian, I believe that people should be able to marry who they choose, as long as both adults, or reasonably close. The states would have been very slow in granting that right protection. Yes, I believe marrying the person that you choose is a natural right, and so it would arguably be in the penumbra of rights in the constitution.
2 - If Obergefell is overturned by what I proudly call the Trump court that overturned Roe, the left will have some justification for their claim that the court is being activist by ignoring precedent.
3 - If Obergefell is overturned, many states will recognize same-sex marriage on their own. Then the "full faith and credit" clause will force the most conservative of states to accept marriages licensed in California, just as states with an 18 year old minimum age must accept marriages licensed in states with a 16 year old minimum age.
If Obergefell is overturned, the left gains new ammo. Deep in their leftie hearts, they always knew that abortion rights are not in the constitution. Their anger at the Dobbs decision is not borne of shock, but of the final eventuality of what they knew was coming.
Don't give them ammo, and alienate gay conservatives, which could lead to court stacking that could bring Roe right back.
In some cases yesTraditional? As in one man/multiple wives? As in wife as property?
Traditional? As in one man/multiple wives? As in wife as property?
Straight marriage is just as immoral.
You can't separate the two. If a law is immoral as slavery, abortion, and gay marriage, it has to fall. It's just the way it works. The first two fell. The last one will fall.