Show where he ADVOCATED that. He did not; he was quoting the passage for historical context as all evangelicals know that the OT commands were to Jews of those times, not modern Christians. You don't know what you are talking about, dude.
And what the bible actually says - and by the way turn to Levitius 20:13 as I have actually discovered the cure for AIDS ok.
Now, this is the cure for AIDS ok, and you know everybody's talking about 'lets have an AIDS free world by 2020', or 'lets have have an AIDS free'.
Look, we can have an AIDS free world by Christmas, you know...[inaudible]
Okay it wouldn't be totally AIDS free, but we'd be like something like 90% AIDS free by Christmas.
Here's what the bible says, Leviticus 20:13:
'If a man also lie with mankind, as he lithe with a woman'...okay.
It says, 'either both of them have committed an abomination, they shall surely be put to death, and their blood should be upon them - my friend, is the cure for AIDS.
It was right there in the bible all along, and their asking for tens of billions of dollars for research and testing - its terrible.
Right there. Because if you executed the homos like god recommended, you wouldn't have all this AIDS running rampant.
Irrelevant, as he was arguing we should follow Leviticus 20:13, which he claims calls for the execution of homosexuals. Historical context is not relevant as he is arguing that we should in the present execute gay people to get rid of AIDS.
I'm Catholic and mostly agree with you, but I think God is merciful to those born into heretical denominations like the Baptists and Anglicans and are thus raised in those heresies and not fully responsible.
Yet you hold homosexuals responsible for their own sexuality, which is something due mostly to human genetics and environmental factors. Though you probably believe people are 'turned gay', and that LGBT groups are evil cultists, getting their orders from Satan down below.
There is no need for a transcript, Einstein, just post the time on the video where you think he said 'kill all the homos'. Sheesh.
He advocated it in the above transcript, which was required as you keep denying what was actually said on the video. The video is on Raw Story, which is what the first article eventually links you to: "[...]It says, 'either both of them have committed an abomination,
they shall surely be put to death, and their blood should be upon them -
my friend, is the cure for AIDS.[...]"
Couldn't be clearer. But it is pointless trying to argue with someone that has closed the door to reality, and entered a world of fiction - full of 'gay agendas', 'liberal plots', and 'Democratic party conspiracies'.
Again, you libtards do not understand who 'God's Judgment' works. God is not going to smite anyone with fire bolts from the sky. Don't know that He ever really literally did that.
He literally interpreted the bible, meaning that GOD really does smite from the sky. IF his interpretation is not literal, then claiming that homosexuals should be put to death is stated in the bible and should be followed through with, is lying to and deceiving his congregation - which is what he is doing anyway.
I am not a 'liberal' or a 'conservative', as such vague and broad generalizations, don't represent me. I don't support the state system, I am opposed to religious dominance, and I don't like corporate control of the US economy. That is a sound rejection of the status quo, and neo-liberalism.
But I doubt you are capable of comprehending that not every individual on Earth can be put down to collective hive mind groups of 'conservatives' or 'liberals' - hence your need for a moral outrage post.
But I do know that traditional values systems are so near universal among strong nations because such values strengthen nations demographically, intellectually and cosmologically.
Traditional values are a fallacy, at least in the sense that the bible hasn't governed western society since the middle ages. Thankfully the power of the Catholic Church and the Islamic Empires were broken, which led to industrialization and social-economic improvement.
When fags like you destroy the natural social and moral order of things, you weaken the nation in more ways than you can imagine and once the moral rot has set in long enough and deeply enough the nation will get its judgment in the form of the disaster it brings upon itself.
If your moral outrage requires derogatorily language, then by all means continue - though derogatorily language isn't an argument.
It might be fun to make derogatory language over you 'sucking Putin's cock and packing your bags to join him in Russia, if you hate the 21st century so much'. But don't confuse derogatorily language with an actual argument.
What weakens America is collectivism, whether by the state, institutions, or through organized religion. In advocating collectivism, through imposing your religion upon the rights of others, you represent the threat to the very constitution America was founded on.
If true tyranny comes to America, it will be due to those with a bible and gun in hand, a state decree, or a substantial sum of money and a private army. At worst America is an oligarchy, on a gradual march to a corporate state disinterested in advocating against civil freedoms (as long as it doesn't hurt their profit margins).
No one else has to lift a finger, especially not God.
God won't lift a finger because he either:
- Doesn't exist (so he hasn't done anything)
- Doesn't believe in imposing his morality by force
- Thinks humanity should have freedom of choice and action
- Thinks homosexuals are no more sinful than heterosexuals
Going for the last one, if you follow the premise that God exists. IF there is a vengeful and hateful god, then I would gladly martyr myself for the cause of individualism in the afterlife. Though it is guessing game, as I haven't died yet, and I am expecting just black and the end of my existence - rather than angels, demons, or hot pokers.