Conservative Birth Rate Is 50% Higher Than Liberal Birth Rate

[Independent thinker]

Reportedly, the birth rate for Conservative women in 2025 is 2.18, above the replacement rate of approximately 2.1.

The birth rate for Liberal women (birthing people?) was only 1.42, well below the replacement value of about 2.1.

View attachment 1183530

Link (no paywall)

https://archive.is/nZcDY

This has significant implications, obviously. Eventually, a group with such a low birth rate dies out if the children have the same characteristics as the parents.

One has to wonder if the combination of Liberal policies contributes to such a low rate. Liberals have more abortions, are more likely to be gay, less likely to be in traditional family relationships, and more likely to believe that humans are causing irreparable harm to the planet.

Liberals would probably tell you that the low birth rate comes with more education and affluence, pointing to lower birth rates in the Western world than the third world...

View attachment 1183534

I'm a bit skeptical of that, as smart, happy, rich people tend to be better equipped for supporting large families.

And this map by state muddies the water a bit (most states follow the trend, but there are outliers like Hawaii and West Virginia)...

View attachment 1183539

Same map with 2024 election result map:
View attachment 1183539View attachment 1183552

I wonder if this is an interesting example of Darwin's survival of the fittest, but applied to mental state as opposed to purely physical traits. In this case, harmful or less desirable ideologies are less likely to reproduce and get passed on.

These people are just too stupid. They can't win for losing. However, I do think they deserve some credit for helping stop the gene pool from passing on defective genes. That's true patriotism and I encourage them to continue. That patriotism is very effective in stopping the insanity from being passed on.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

That's usually the way it is. The poor and ignorant outbreed the wealthy and intelligent.

See: Idiocracy.

There is an unavoidably noticeable lack of intelligence in MAGAs.

A fictional comedy is not a reference, but for an imbecile, no?

Also, MAGAs aren't conservatives. They may call themselvs conservatives, but they have no clue what conservatism is. They went out of their way to run conservatives out of town.

.

It is not conservative birth rate that would be concerning. If the MAGA birthrate is up, we are in trouble.
The children of MAGA need to have an opportunity for education. We can't let the MAGA parents keep their children from education. Education is the enemy of MAGA.

I am MAGA. I am Conservative. But unlike you, I am not so simple minded as to call y'all dumb just because you don't think like I do .

 

[initforme]

Overall the birthrate continues to decline...not a negative. It will make employers compete bigly for employees in the future. Thats when the economy does the best.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Reportedly, the birth rate for Conservative women in 2025 is 2.18, above the replacement rate of approximately 2.1.

The birth rate for Liberal women (birthing people?) was only 1.42, well below the replacement value of about 2.1.

View attachment 1183530

Link (no paywall)

https://archive.is/nZcDY

This has significant implications, obviously. Eventually, a group with such a low birth rate dies out if the children have the same characteristics as the parents.

One has to wonder if the combination of Liberal policies contributes to such a low rate. Liberals have more abortions, are more likely to be gay, less likely to be in traditional family relationships, and more likely to believe that humans are causing irreparable harm to the planet.

Liberals would probably tell you that the low birth rate comes with more education and affluence, pointing to lower birth rates in the Western world than the third world...

View attachment 1183534

I'm a bit skeptical of that, as smart, happy, rich people tend to be better equipped for supporting large families.

And this map by state muddies the water a bit (most states follow the trend, but there are outliers like Hawaii and West Virginia)...

View attachment 1183539

Same map with 2024 election result map:
View attachment 1183539View attachment 1183552

I wonder if this is an interesting example of Darwin's survival of the fittest, but applied to mental state as opposed to purely physical traits. In this case, harmful or less desirable ideologies are less likely to reproduce and get passed on.

Winning

 

[IDIOCRACY]

This is literally the opening for Idiocracy.

Yeah but they portray that couple as intelligent. Liberals are simply batshit crazy, and such pussies

 

[initforme]

Why are so many against a declining birth rate?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Let’s face it, 40% of liberal woman are just unfuckable.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

Let’s face it, 40% of liberal woman are just unfuckable.

As you know, Conservatives tend to be better looking...

Science Weighs In: Conservatives “Look Better”

Why do political conservatives hold a "beauty advantage?" New research provides a couple of common-sense explanations.

www.psychologytoday.com

And more importantly, way less crazy...

 

[Dekster]

Not surprising really. Multiplication is the only math conservatives understand.

 

[drudge X]

Not surprising really. Multiplication is the only math conservatives understand.

As opposed to leftists struggling with 2+2?

 

[drudge X]

Gay people could procreate if they so chose to. But they mostly don't because they don't want to sleep with people of the opposite sex.

However, plenty of conservatives are also gay.

There's a saying.

If you place 100 gays and trans on an island and return 100 years later, all died.

If you place 100 straight men and women on an island and return 100 years later, you would see a vibrant self sufficient community equivalent to Singapore.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

Reportedly, the birth rate for Conservative women in 2025 is 2.18, above the replacement rate of approximately 2.1.

The birth rate for Liberal women (birthing people?) was only 1.42, well below the replacement value of about 2.1.

View attachment 1183530

Link (no paywall)

https://archive.is/nZcDY

This has significant implications, obviously. Eventually, a group with such a low birth rate dies out if the children have the same characteristics as the parents.

One has to wonder if the combination of Liberal policies contributes to such a low rate. Liberals have more abortions, are more likely to be gay, less likely to be in traditional family relationships, and more likely to believe that humans are causing irreparable harm to the planet.

Liberals would probably tell you that the low birth rate comes with more education and affluence, pointing to lower birth rates in the Western world than the third world...

View attachment 1183534

I'm a bit skeptical of that, as smart, happy, rich people tend to be better equipped for supporting large families.

And this map by state muddies the water a bit (most states follow the trend, but there are outliers like Hawaii and West Virginia)...

View attachment 1183539

Same map with 2024 election result map:
View attachment 1183539View attachment 1183552

I wonder if this is an interesting example of Darwin's survival of the fittest, but applied to mental state as opposed to purely physical traits. In this case, harmful or less desirable ideologies are less likely to reproduce and get passed on.

Well, let's take one racial group of Democrat voters, the blacks.
Margaret Sanger, an avowed racist who hated blacks and wanted them gotten rid of, created abortion clinics where the black populations were clustered.
The Democrats rewarded blacks with financial incentives to "not" get married and have abortions. Had this not happened, the black population in the United States would be more on par with the white population and thus a more formidable political force for the Democrats.

 

[whitehall]

It sounds logical but how do they determine the statistics? Is it made up?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

You act like fewer leftists is a bad thing.

That's the only reason I support the utility of abortion.

Children OFTEN split with their parents on social issues

 

[drudge X]

Well, let's take one racial group of Democrat voters, the blacks.
Margaret Sanger, an avowed racist who hated blacks and wanted them gotten rid of, created abortion clinics where the black populations were clustered.
The Democrats rewarded blacks with financial incentives to "not" get married and have abortions. Had this not happened, the black population in the United States would be more on par with the white population and thus a more formidable political force for the Democrats.

That was then. Problem today is blacks cannot resist the urge to kill each other.

 

[citygator]

Yeah but they portray that couple as intelligent. Liberals are simply batshit crazy, and such pussies

Sure Mr Keyboard warrior. Wanna type on your keyboard how tuff you are? Impress us *****.

 

[Dekster]

As opposed to leftists struggling with 2+2?

Can't blame them for not being swingers like those CPAC folks.

 

[frigidweirdo]

There's a saying.

If you place 100 gays and trans on an island and return 100 years later, all died.

If you place 100 straight men and women on an island and return 100 years later, you would see a vibrant self sufficient community equivalent to Singapore.

There's another say, there are too many people on this planet. Having people who don't reproduce is actually good for us. Even with all these gay people not having kids, the world's population is heading towards an abyss.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Why are so many against a declining birth rate?

ALL sane people who know what’s good for this nation are against a declining birth rate amongst Caucasians…ALL sane people who know what’s good for this nation are FOR a declining birth rate amongst ALL dark people. Ain’t that right Unkotare ?

 

[candycorn]

A.I. says,
"Smarter people are less likely to have children due to a combination of factors, including delayed childbearing for education, an increased focus on education and career, and evolutionary psychological reasons suggesting a lower value for traditional parenthood
. Additionally, higher education and income are correlated with lower fertility rates due to changes in lifestyle, values, and the economic investment in fewer children"

I don't think that necessarily equates to happiness. I graduated with a 4.0 in my engineering major and developed all kinds of things at work, but my happiest times were spent with my wife and family.

I also take issue with your underlying premise that Liberals are more intelligent than Conservatives. Liberals with degrees in Gender Studies working at Olive Garden have to hire rednecks to fix their transmission or HVAC system.

Nothing makes a person sound more idiotic than when they trot out that “gender studies” trope. You sir are an idiot.