Consequences

[ReinyDays]

Al Gore has an IQ of 80?

That explains why he's so much RICHER than us ... got to be stupid for that kind of money ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

That explains why he's so much RICHER than us ... got to be stupid for that kind of money ...

More likely his low IQ followers (democrats) are helping him get rich while Gore continues to show that he is profoundly a science illiterate with a lot lies behind it which is made possible because his followers are also science illiterates and morons thus, he is still pushing his brand of bullshit

 

[ReinyDays]

More likely his low IQ followers (democrats) are helping him get rich while Gore continues to show that he is profoundly a science illiterate with a lot lies behind it which is made possible because his followers are also science illiterates and morons thus, he is still pushing his brand of bullshit

Right ... smart people are all conservatives ...that's why they don't have to finish Middle School ... they don't need science, they have the Bible ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

Right ... smart people are all conservatives ...that's why they don't have to finish Middle School ... they don't need science, they have the Bible ...

That is a nice deflection you made, I am NEITHER religious or a Conservative thus doesn't bother me.

Cheers.

 

[ReinyDays]

That is a nice deflection you made, I am NEITHER religious or a Conservative thus doesn't bother me.

Cheers.

You're also not well educated in the sciences ... at least not beyond what's taught in high school ... just another Trumpanzee flinging your poop at people ...

Conservatives are reasonable and honest people ... you should try it sometime ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

You're also not well educated in the sciences ... at least not beyond what's taught in high school ... just another Trumpanzee flinging your poop at people ...

Conservatives are reasonable and honest people ... you should try it sometime ...

Never claimed to be a scientist but I have been in this for 50 years thus learned a few things over time, people like Westwall, FlaCalTenn and other members with science degrees and a science career can do the deep science and math stuff which most people including YOU would struggle with, I deal with stuff that the average public have a chance to understand thus effective in making fools of them who persist in fighting the official data.

Your snobbish comments is a turn off which is why I don't consider you that credible and that your occasional immature bullshit quickly grows old as your latest post is evidence that you can be full of bullshit.

Your deflection is boring as you attack me again while I didn't attack you until now.

 

[ReinyDays]

Never claimed to be a scientist but I have been in this for 50 years thus learned a few things over time, people like Westwall, FlaCalTenn and other members with science degrees and a science career can do the deep science and math stuff which most people including YOU would struggle with, I deal with stuff that the average public have a chance to understand thus effective in making fools of them who persist in fighting the official data.

Your snobbish comments is a turn off which is why I don't consider you that credible and that your occasional immature bullshit quickly grows old as your latest post is evidence that you can be full of bullshit.

Your deflection is boring as you attack me again while I didn't attack you until now.

Thank you ... coming from you, this is quite the compliment ...

 

[Old Rocks]

Never claimed to be a scientist but I have been in this for 50 years thus learned a few things over time, people like Westwall, FlaCalTenn and other members with science degrees and a science career can do the deep science and math stuff which most people including YOU would struggle with, I deal with stuff that the average public have a chance to understand thus effective in making fools of them who persist in fighting the official data.

Your snobbish comments is a turn off which is why I don't consider you that credible and that your occasional immature bullshit quickly grows old as your latest post is evidence that you can be full of bullshit.

Your deflection is boring as you attack me again while I didn't attack you until now.

In other words, you don't have enough science training to tell with you are listening to BS. Westwall is pure BS.

 

[Old Rocks]

Do you think it was any different in the last interglacial which was 2C warmer than today?

It is called rate of change, old boy. And the delta v for the present is far above anything seen in the last interglacial.

 

[ding]

It is called rate of change, old boy. And the delta v for the present is far above anything seen in the last interglacial.

Not from the data I’ve looked at. So you don’t believe it would be worse if it was 2C warmer?

 

[ReinyDays]

Not from the data I’ve looked at. So you don’t believe it would be worse if it was 2C warmer?

[Whistles through teeth] ... you're correct ... NOAA data clearly shows faster warming between 1910 and 1940 ... then global cooling ... apparently WWII and the aftermath didn't produce any carbon dioxide ... not until the Reagan Administration ??? ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

In other words, you don't have enough science training to tell with you are listening to BS. Westwall is pure BS.

Your prjudice is why you are a chronic liar and never honestly debate anything.

Westfall IS a scientist with a big science degree thus your attack on him is stupid.

You show that you are a science illiterate with your stupid pseudoscience replies that constantly skirts the evidence/data offered which I have done repeatedly and honestly thus it is YOU who is the failure.

When are you ever going to address these posts you keep running away from...., LOL.

LINK

LINK

LINK

LINK

You never addressed them; just run away like the science illiterate you are.

 

[Sunsettommy]

It is called rate of change, old boy. And the delta v for the present is far above anything seen in the last interglacial.

That doesn't support the long failed AGW hypothesis, thus another dead post on arrival is all you can make as the rate of warming is similar to previous warming trends back to the 1850's, from the BBC:

Q&A: Professor Phil Jones​

Excerpt:

Phil Jones is director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA), which has been at the centre of the row over hacked e-mails.

The BBC's environment analyst Roger Harrabin put questions to Professor Jones, including several gathered from climate sceptics. The questions were put to Professor Jones with the co-operation of UEA's press office.

---

A - Do you agree that according to the global temperature record used by the IPCC, the rates of global warming from 1860-1880, 1910-1940 and 1975-1998 were identical?

An initial point to make is that in the responses to these questions I've assumed that when you talk about the global temperature record, you mean the record that combines the estimates from land regions with those from the marine regions of the world. CRU produces the land component, with the Met Office Hadley Centre producing the marine component.

Temperature data for the period 1860-1880 are more uncertain, because of sparser coverage, than for later periods in the 20th Century. The 1860-1880 period is also only 21 years in length. As for the two periods 1910-40 and 1975-1998 the warming rates are not statistically significantly different (see numbers below).

I have also included the trend over the period 1975 to 2009, which has a very similar trend to the period 1975-1998.

So, in answer to the question, the warming rates for all 4 periods are similar and not statistically significantly different from each other.

Here are the trends and significances for each period:

LINK

What diploma Mill did you come from?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Not from the data I’ve looked at. So you don’t believe it would be worse if it was 2C warmer?

The fool still ignores the much warmer early Holocene that didn't generate disaster for the planet.

He is so stuck on the failed warmest ideology to see the reality.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[Captain Caveman]

View attachment 1126998

Looks like they increased the height of the lighthouse in anticipation of the sea level rise...that appears to have not happened

 

[ReinyDays]

View attachment 1126998

Great shot of the pollution destroying the planet ... see how the ocean in the top photograph is a clean natural grey but the bottom image is a sickly puke blue green? ... the pollution even turned the lighthouse red and white ..

Disgusting ... color photography is the problem ...

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

So he can't go to this website?

National Hurricane Center

 

[Old Rocks]

View attachment 1126998

Gee whizzaroo, another ignorant ass than never hear of tides.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Gee whizzaroo, another ignorant ass than never hear of tides.

Gee whiz old rockhead ignores posts #52 and 53, must be your inability to a cogent rebuttal was beyond your cheap college degree.