Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
Didn't the 9th district just rule against this? Is this Iowa just wasting taxpayer money with fruitless laws that they will now try to defend, losing at each step?
Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
my lord youre a fucking idiot,,,Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
Didn't the 9th district just rule against this? Is this Iowa just wasting taxpayer money with fruitless laws that they will now try to defend, losing at each step?
Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
Their decision is irrational and stupid as hell!
"The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The new in Young v. State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. San Diego, which held that concealed carry is outside the Second Amendment. According to the Ninth Circuit, carrying arms in public for defense is "not within the scope of the right protected by the Second Amendment."
=====
The Second Amendment doesn't make that claim at all, this is leftist thinking of the court.
You didn't even read your own LINK, it makes a strong argument that the 9th court decision is garbage.
Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
The article is a libertarian opinion piece. That doesn't mean the ninth district didn't make a ruling.Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
I suggest that you stop now, you are being an idiot in the thread, YOUR link doesn't even think the 9th court decision was rational, you made a fool of yourself by NOT reading your link.
Thanks. I was confusing with potatoheads in idaho.Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
None......the 9th handles the west coast states...and Hawaii...
Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
I suggest that you stop now, you are being an idiot in the thread, YOUR link doesn't even think the 9th court decision was rational, you made a fool of yourself by NOT reading your link.
The article is a libertarian opinion piece. That doesn't mean the ninth district didn't make a ruling.Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
I suggest that you stop now, you are being an idiot in the thread, YOUR link doesn't even think the 9th court decision was rational, you made a fool of yourself by NOT reading your link.
The article is a libertarian opinion piece. That doesn't mean the ninth district didn't make a ruling.Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?
I suggest that you stop now, you are being an idiot in the thread, YOUR link doesn't even think the 9th court decision was rational, you made a fool of yourself by NOT reading your link.
It doesn't matter WHO wrote it, the 9th court is full of shit on this one.....
"The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The new in Young v. State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. San Diego, which held that concealed carry is outside the Second Amendment. According to the Ninth Circuit, carrying arms in public for defense is "not within the scope of the right protected by the Second Amendment."
Is Iowa not part of the ninth circuits jurisdiction?Hmmm....Didn't the 9th district just rule against this?
No
Ninth Circuit holds there is no right to bear arms outside the home
The en banc Ninth Circuit last week held that the Second Amendment does not extend to open public firearm carriage. The...reason.com
What does that have to do with Iowa's new law?