Confused, angry, paranoid Joe Biden lashes out at Americans' civil rights again

[Osiris-ODS]

F-15s. Lolz. He's stuck in the 80s, probably just watched Top Gun before that press conference, while wearing his aviator sunglasses and eating his jello.

 

[Flash]

Why isn't Joe Dufus being impeached for threatening to use nuclear weapons and fighter bombers against Americans?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

This time, he was dribbling and ranting about how Americans would need F-15s and nukes to "move against the government", before dissolving into confused, angry mumbling.

This is a scared, paranoid, confused old man losing his mind, and he's dangerous.

You seem to be confusing the same president with the psychotic pos who lost the White House in November. And the senate. And the house.

you know that only people who are delusional are listening to your garbage. Right?

No, I'm talking about the husk of a man who is currently pretending to be president. Are you ok with him threatening Americans with death if they "move against the government"? That's the type of dictatorship you want?

What do you think taking up arms against your country is?
Treason

When the government oversteps its legal bounds, such action is patriotic.

This government has not just overstepped bounds, it has become a criminal enterprise.

 

[TheParser]

This time, he was dribbling and ranting about how Americans would need F-15s and nukes to "move against the government", before dissolving into confused, angry mumbling.

This is a scared, paranoid, confused old man losing his mind, and he's dangerous.

Let's be patient with him.

He was given something to read, and he tried his best.

Poor old dude.

His "advisers" could not reveal the actual reason for this orgy of current violence.

So -- of course -- they fell back on the guns excuse.

 

[freyasman]

This time, he was dribbling and ranting about how Americans would need F-15s and nukes to "move against the government", before dissolving into confused, angry mumbling.

This is a scared, paranoid, confused old man losing his mind, and he's dangerous.

You seem to be confusing the same president with the psychotic pos who lost the White House in November. And the senate. And the house.

you know that only people who are delusional are listening to your garbage. Right?

No, I'm talking about the husk of a man who is currently pretending to be president. Are you ok with him threatening Americans with death if they "move against the government"? That's the type of dictatorship you want?

What do you think taking up arms against your country is?
Treason

When the government oversteps its legal bounds, such action is patriotic.

This government has not just overstepped bounds, it has become a criminal enterprise.

It always was.

 

[InspectorDetector]

This time, he was dribbling and ranting about how Americans would need F-15s and nukes to "move against the government", before dissolving into confused, angry mumbling.

This is a scared, paranoid, confused old man losing his mind, and he's dangerous.

then how can there have been anything resembling an insurrection? the crowd had no weapons.

I have said that repeatedly. Had the "mob" (as the fascists call it) been armed, they would have EASILY taken the building. Easily. However, it doesn't work into the narrative of the fascists left wing.....

 

[jc456]

and on another note

Monday was one of the deadliest days in Chicago this year, following a weekend when more than 50 people were shot

There have been at least 317 homicides in Chicago this year, up from 302 this time last year.

chicago.suntimes.com

Monday was one of the deadliest days in Chicago this year, following a weekend when more than 50 people were shot​

and no gun control in the country will eliminate this.

 

[Flash]

Notice that Joe Dufus didn't recommend nuking Negroes for six months of significant terrorism with destruction in over 200 American cities.

He just wants to nuke us Patriots that enjoy our Constitutional rights.

 

[marvin martian]

and on another note

Monday was one of the deadliest days in Chicago this year, following a weekend when more than 50 people were shot

There have been at least 317 homicides in Chicago this year, up from 302 this time last year.

chicago.suntimes.com

Monday was one of the deadliest days in Chicago this year, following a weekend when more than 50 people were shot​

and no gun control in the country will eliminate this.

True, but the daily slaughter of blacks in the blue shitholes like Chicago is exactly what the DemoKKKrats want to happen.

 

[jc456]

and on another note

Monday was one of the deadliest days in Chicago this year, following a weekend when more than 50 people were shot

There have been at least 317 homicides in Chicago this year, up from 302 this time last year.

chicago.suntimes.com

Monday was one of the deadliest days in Chicago this year, following a weekend when more than 50 people were shot​

and no gun control in the country will eliminate this.

True, but the daily slaughter of blacks in the blue shitholes like Chicago is exactly what the DemoKKKrats want to happen.

that's how I know BLM is a front for white guys.

what fools each of the pro sporting leagues are eh?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

If they move against the government with their pee shooters, then yes … they will die.
So what was it he was wrong about?

We properly “move against the government” at the ballot box. That must be why you Fascists want to stop that.

Xiden has earned his name now by threatening to use military force against protestors who don't have such weapons.

*****SMILE*****

 

[jc456]

If they move against the government with their pee shooters, then yes … they will die.
So what was it he was wrong about?

We properly “move against the government” at the ballot box. That must be why you Fascists want to stop that.

View attachment 505108

Xiden has earned his name now by threatening to use military force against protestors who don't have such weapons.

*****SMILE*****

very hong kong like.

 

[FA_Q2]

"The 2nd amendment from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn't own a cannon."

What an asinine statement. The second is a restriction on government, not on the people. No matter what you may think about the room that the second leaves for regulating the ownership of weapons, the second does not limit anyone from doing anything. That is not the purpose of the bill of rights or rights in general.

We have forgotten what rights really are and why they are important.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

very hong kong like.

It became that way before he even took office

Did they get the fifty cals mounted and tanks ordered in?

*****SMILE*****

 

[DrLove]

very hong kong like.

View attachment 505111

View attachment 505112

View attachment 505113

It became that way before he even took office

Did they get the fifty cals mounted and tanks ordered in?

*****SMILE*****

You've been "Damaged"
Assuming your a Legit Vet? --- I am SO sorry about that ...
And thank you for your service!

 

[Cecilie1200]

"The 2nd amendment from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn't own a cannon."

What an asinine statement. The second is a restriction on government, not on the people. No matter what you may think about the room that the second leaves for regulating the ownership of weapons, the second does not limit anyone from doing anything. That is not the purpose of the bill of rights or rights in general.

We have forgotten what rights really are and why they are important.

Besides, cannons could be owned by private individuals back in the Founders' day. Privately-owned ships often had cannon, which would have also been owned by the same individual or individuals who owned the ship. I believe there are also records of private owners actually lending their cannons to the Revolutionary army.

 

[Flash]

"The 2nd amendment from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn't own a cannon."

Pedo Joe is full of shit and ignorant of history.

These Moon Bats don't know any more about the Constitution than they know about History, Economics, Climate Science, Biology or Ethics.

There are not many limitations in "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

 

[Decus]

What is quite clear is that Joe Biden is saying that 1/6 was not an insurrection, and that there was no risk to the government from an UNARMED group of protestors.

Thanks Joe.

.

 

[marvin martian]

"The 2nd amendment from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn't own a cannon."

What an asinine statement. The second is a restriction on government, not on the people. No matter what you may think about the room that the second leaves for regulating the ownership of weapons, the second does not limit anyone from doing anything. That is not the purpose of the bill of rights or rights in general.

We have forgotten what rights really are and why they are important.

Besides, cannons could be owned by private individuals back in the Founders' day. Privately-owned ships often had cannon, which would have also been owned by the same individual or individuals who owned the ship. I believe there are also records of private owners actually lending their cannons to the Revolutionary army.

Plenty of people made their own, too. Just like they do now.

 

[freyasman]