Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Concerning the so-called "Reverend" Al Sharpton
- Thread starter TemplarKormac
- Start date
Carib Gyal
VIP Member
One was a peacemakerA huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
There's nothing funnier than when you guys try to play the "MLK" card.
The other is a war monger
Beware false prophets.Stop me if you've heard this before.
Al Sharpton is the most derisive people in America, a supposed man of God. He claims to champion the advancement of his race, but only seeks to divide his people through incident. Any act of legitimate justice carried out against a young black person is met with "you won Mr. Prosecutor, but don't cut your gloves off just yet, this fight isn't over!" He chooses to defend young black men with rap sheets longer than our tax code and incite violence and chaos with just a few words.
Corinthians 14:33
"For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints."
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
A huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
Why?
...because King didn't advocate non-violence and civil disobedience?
lol
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
See, you have to understand Sharpton the way the RWnuts understand him.
They will say, for example, that you know when Sharpton is advocating violence...
...it's when you hear him advocating non-violence...
They will say, for example, that you know when Sharpton is advocating violence...
...it's when you hear him advocating non-violence...
One was a peacemakerA huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
There's nothing funnier than when you guys try to play the "MLK" card.
The other is a war monger
I'm confident that if you'd been alive and politically conscious in the 60s, you'd have said the same thing about MLK that you say about Sharpton now.
You're missing the common element between them, which is what makes your attempts to re-appropriate MLK so laughable.
Carib Gyal
VIP Member
A huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
Why?
...because King didn't advocate non-violence and civil disobedience?
lol
Anyone who doesn't see Al Sharpton as a war monger is not telling themselves the truth.One was a peacemakerA huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
There's nothing funnier than when you guys try to play the "MLK" card.
The other is a war monger
I'm confident that if you'd been alive and politically conscious in the 60s, you'd have said the same thing about MLK that you say about Sharpton now.
You're missing the common element between them, which is what makes your attempts to re-appropriate MLK so laughable.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
A huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
Why?
...because King didn't advocate non-violence and civil disobedience?
lolAnyone who doesn't see Al Sharpton as a war monger is not telling themselves the truth.One was a peacemakerA huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
There's nothing funnier than when you guys try to play the "MLK" card.
The other is a war monger
I'm confident that if you'd been alive and politically conscious in the 60s, you'd have said the same thing about MLK that you say about Sharpton now.
You're missing the common element between them, which is what makes your attempts to re-appropriate MLK so laughable.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
The people who thought like you do called MLK a "war monger" in the 60s, too.
Carib Gyal
VIP Member
That's nice. I'm calling Al Sharpton a war monger in 2014.A huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
Why?
...because King didn't advocate non-violence and civil disobedience?
lolAnyone who doesn't see Al Sharpton as a war monger is not telling themselves the truth.One was a peacemakerA huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.
There's nothing funnier than when you guys try to play the "MLK" card.
The other is a war monger
I'm confident that if you'd been alive and politically conscious in the 60s, you'd have said the same thing about MLK that you say about Sharpton now.
You're missing the common element between them, which is what makes your attempts to re-appropriate MLK so laughable.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
The people who thought like you do called MLK a "war monger" in the 60s, too.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
That's nice. I'm calling Al Sharpton a war monger in 2014.A huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.The need to delegitimize all perceived enemies is the mark of someone more interested in feeling good about their selves than understanding a situation.
Why?
...because King didn't advocate non-violence and civil disobedience?
lolAnyone who doesn't see Al Sharpton as a war monger is not telling themselves the truth.One was a peacemaker
There's nothing funnier than when you guys try to play the "MLK" card.
The other is a war monger
I'm confident that if you'd been alive and politically conscious in the 60s, you'd have said the same thing about MLK that you say about Sharpton now.
You're missing the common element between them, which is what makes your attempts to re-appropriate MLK so laughable.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
The people who thought like you do called MLK a "war monger" in the 60s, too.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
There will never be a "race war" in this country, no matter how much you guys are hoping for it.
Carib Gyal
VIP Member
It won't be because of Al Sharpton's lack of effort.That's nice. I'm calling Al Sharpton a war monger in 2014.A huge step in the right direction would be to stop listening to Al Sharpton and start remembering Martin Luther King.
Why?
...because King didn't advocate non-violence and civil disobedience?
lolAnyone who doesn't see Al Sharpton as a war monger is not telling themselves the truth.One was a peacemaker
The other is a war monger
I'm confident that if you'd been alive and politically conscious in the 60s, you'd have said the same thing about MLK that you say about Sharpton now.
You're missing the common element between them, which is what makes your attempts to re-appropriate MLK so laughable.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
The people who thought like you do called MLK a "war monger" in the 60s, too.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
There will never be a "race war" in this country, no matter how much you guys are hoping for it.
It won't be because of Al Sharpton's lack of effort.That's nice. I'm calling Al Sharpton a war monger in 2014.Why?
...because King didn't advocate non-violence and civil disobedience?
lolAnyone who doesn't see Al Sharpton as a war monger is not telling themselves the truth.
I'm confident that if you'd been alive and politically conscious in the 60s, you'd have said the same thing about MLK that you say about Sharpton now.
You're missing the common element between them, which is what makes your attempts to re-appropriate MLK so laughable.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
The people who thought like you do called MLK a "war monger" in the 60s, too.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
There will never be a "race war" in this country, no matter how much you guys are hoping for it.
Al Sharpton doesn't want a "race war", you do.
Carib Gyal
VIP Member
Why does everyone on this board always want to make the conversation about me? Because it's all about MEIt won't be because of Al Sharpton's lack of effort.That's nice. I'm calling Al Sharpton a war monger in 2014.Anyone who doesn't see Al Sharpton as a war monger is not telling themselves the truth.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
The people who thought like you do called MLK a "war monger" in the 60s, too.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
There will never be a "race war" in this country, no matter how much you guys are hoping for it.
Al Sharpton doesn't want a "race war", you do.
Why does everyone on this board always want to make the conversation about me? Because it's all about MEIt won't be because of Al Sharpton's lack of effort.That's nice. I'm calling Al Sharpton a war monger in 2014.The people who thought like you do called MLK a "war monger" in the 60s, too.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
There will never be a "race war" in this country, no matter how much you guys are hoping for it.
Al Sharpton doesn't want a "race war", you do.
It's about you because you are who I'm talking to. You are the one making asinine statements about "race wars".
You can blame the Rev. Al all you want, but that won't change anything.
Carib Gyal
VIP Member
Ah, OK. For the last 4 or 5 posts I've been telling you a race war would not be wise, and your answer is that I want a race war.Why does everyone on this board always want to make the conversation about me? Because it's all about MEIt won't be because of Al Sharpton's lack of effort.That's nice. I'm calling Al Sharpton a war monger in 2014.
It would not be wise to go to war over race in America.
There will never be a "race war" in this country, no matter how much you guys are hoping for it.
Al Sharpton doesn't want a "race war", you do.
It's about you because you are who I'm talking to. You are the one making asinine statements about "race wars".
You can blame the Rev. Al all you want, but that won't change anything.
Carry on.
Nice pic of you Luddly, looks like you lost some weight.For entertainment purposes only.
Do not try this at home.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I will never consider Sharpton a reverend. He is a tax evader, nothing reverential about that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, OK. For the last 4 or 5 posts I've been telling you a race war would not be wise, and your answer is that I want a race war.Why does everyone on this board always want to make the conversation about me? Because it's all about MEIt won't be because of Al Sharpton's lack of effort.
There will never be a "race war" in this country, no matter how much you guys are hoping for it.
Al Sharpton doesn't want a "race war", you do.
It's about you because you are who I'm talking to. You are the one making asinine statements about "race wars".
You can blame the Rev. Al all you want, but that won't change anything.
Carry on.
If you say so. You're the only one who's mentioned a "race war" so far - I think you might have given yourself away a little.
I will never consider Sharpton a reverend. He is a tax evader, nothing reverential about that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So taxes are how you measure spirituality?
That's interesting.
Carib Gyal
VIP Member
I'm the one who said multiple times a race war wouldn't be wise. Your response was that I wanted a race war. lol.Ah, OK. For the last 4 or 5 posts I've been telling you a race war would not be wise, and your answer is that I want a race war.Why does everyone on this board always want to make the conversation about me? Because it's all about MEIt won't be because of Al Sharpton's lack of effort.
Al Sharpton doesn't want a "race war", you do.
It's about you because you are who I'm talking to. You are the one making asinine statements about "race wars".
You can blame the Rev. Al all you want, but that won't change anything.
Carry on.
If you say so. You're the only one who's mentioned a "race war" so far - I think you might have given yourself away a little.
Because I said Al Sharpton is a war monger. I still say so.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 127
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 570
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 696
- Replies
- 50
- Views
- 3K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 158
- Replies
- 131
- Views
- 621
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8252
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-