As was I. I am from Dinétah, which I am sure none of the Supremes have ever visited, and the home land told me they were not completely Merican crazy. The earth was right, as always.
No. Totally expected. I am sorry you feel it anti-climactic the Attorney General felt no need to apologize to you for doing what she thought was right. Normal people did not expect it. You will just have to live without it. Or you can send her a nasty gram and ***** at her, if you think it will help you get what you want. You should be more like me, saying yep. Figured. Unless you are simple enough to actully be breathing some goofy sigh of relief. Most people did not expect the Supremes to rule in favor. I didn't hear a single mainstream news service or pundit predicting it. You must be living in an echo chamber of your own mind. Now, you whine, because you didn't get an apology? Grow up.
I was wrong on what I thought the court would do. I'm not really surprised, I just thought Roberts would of wanted a better legacy for his tenure. Simply having a different opinion than the court doesn't make anyone objectively wrong, that's the thing about opinions, there is no real objective right or wrong. The opinion of the court is just that, an opinion. Albeit the one that carries the highest legal authority. I don't really think you understand the legal arguments either way. And to be clear the Supreme Court didn't decide that Trump wasn't an insurrectionist, they punted on that issue, they merely said the decision to remove him from the ballot should go to congress. Either way, I've always fully expected him to lose the election and be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law which I still see no reason to doubt. I wouldn't start beating your chest just yet. It's going to be a bad year for Trump, legally speaking. He owes NY half a billion by the end of March. Right around when his criminal fraud trial starts and there's still a chance his D.C. court case starts by the end of the summer and this is all after Trump was adjudicated in civil court as defaming the victim of his sexual assault. Not a lot of good news going on for Trump legally.
Colorado court
and everyone here knows you take your marching orders from the msm. LOL
They didn't say he was and insurrectionist either. As a matter of fact, NO official body has made that determination. Since we live in a society that believes "innocent until proven guilty" that would suggest he is not.
Tsk, tsk, tsk, should I prepare another crow?
Escrow account, not NY, until the appeals process is exhausted. Those interest payments work both ways should the appeal go against NY, those taxpayers will have another reason to detest their elected officials.
Again, we'll see what the appeals court decides.
Not as bad as you and the democrats would like. Ask Jack Smith.Not a lot of good news going on for Trump legally.
I haven't been beating my chest--just stating facts. Democrats, you being one of them, have been doing that. I simply referred to the fact that you folks were so sure that your hatred would prevail. I am just pointing out what was evident to so many of us. Thank you for being honest enough to admit your opinion was not the legal opinion of the SCOTUS' unanimous decision.
Karnac has spoken, LMAO You're batting O fer so far. Not unusual for people who form their opinions from a position of ignorance.
Any person with half a brain would realize two can that game and Joe Biden could be removed from ballots in red states.
Sure they did. Colorado Supreme Court is an official body and this Supreme Court didn't find that they erred on that determination, only that insurrectionist candidates need to be dealt with by Congress.
Feel free to prepare whatever you like. Like I said, your candidate was already adjudicated a defaming sexual assaulter and an insurrectionist. The only things he escaped so far are the consequences, not the determinations.
He's still giving up half a billion and praying to win on appeal in a case where his longtime CFO just admitted to and surrendered to the DOJ for perjury during that trial.
Well when your CFO admits to perjury before the appeals process really kicks off you kinda get the sense of how that one is going.
Jack Smith is doing just fine. He's got a judge in Chutkan who's eager to have this case adjudicated before the election so even if she has to start her trial in August I think we'll be seeing that one before the end of the year.
Like the erroneous one above where you claimed no official body has found him to be an insurrectionist? Im soooo impressed by your command of them.
No, I thought Roberts desire for a positive legacy would prevail.
And the legal opinion of the court that found Trump to be a defaming sexual assaulter? You accept that, right?
Will if Sydney Powell could do it....
On the other hand, she seems to be an entitled leftist who cares not a whit for the Constitution. She is just a portion of the angry, retrograde left that despises everything that is in opposition to leftist authoritarianism.
What fantasy world is she from? Like Tazbro says, they were simply trying to get their names in the paper.
