Colorado judge strikes down AR-15 ban, and over 10 round magazine ban....good.

[2aguy]

We don`t need no stinking background checks. Just open up enough car doors and you`ll have one. I wonder if these guns are now in the hands of criminals?
Metro Police: 12 guns stolen from vehicles last week | News | wsmv.com

Yeah.....shitheads like you have made almost every public space gun free zones by force of law...

Then, when normal gun owners have to leave their guns in their car to get grocery's, the criminals can steal them from their cars...

The solution is to get rid of gun free zones so normal Americans don't have to leave their guns in their cars...

You idiot.

 

[2aguy]

Hey...Daryl hunt........you were saying about the colorado AR-15 ban?

Now, a Colorado judge has tossed the AR-15 ban in the trash bin, along with the provision prohibiting ownership of magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. That’s the backdoor gun ban right there. It’s not just about the rifle. It’s about curbing constitutional gun rights by these magazine laws.

A host of firearms that aren’t AR-15 rifles have magazines with more than 10 rounds. This law would effectively ban them too.


We all see what you’re doing here, liberal America (via Free Beacon):

A judge struck down Boulder, Colorado's ban on the possession of AR-15s and magazines holding more than 10 rounds on Monday.
Colorado state judge Andrew Hartman ruled the city's gun ban violated the state's preemption law, which prevents localities from imposing gun regulations above and beyond state law. Judge Hartman's ruling declares the ordinance invalid and immediately bars the city from enforcing the ban.
"The Court has determined that only Colorado state (or federal) law can prohibit the possession, sale, and transfer of assault weapons and large capacity magazines," Hartman wrote in the ruling.
The ruling is the latest in a string of victories for gun advocates who have used state preemption laws to overturn strict local gun regulations. A Washington court struck down a local ordinance on gun storage in February 2021, and a Pennsylvania court struck down Pittsburgh's attempt to regulate the use of AR-15s inside city limits in October 2019.
Jon Caldara, a longtime Boulder resident who openly flouted the AR-15 ban, said he was "thrilled" by the ruling. The former Denver Post columnist and Independence Institute president publicly announced he would not comply with the order to turn over his AR-15 or ammunition magazines when the ban was instituted in 2019. He filed a separate federal suit against the ordinance and said his family has received backlash from supporters ever since.
"I was probably the most publicly known criminal in Boulder," he told the Washington Free Beacon. "That made us social outcasts. And it was really bad. My daughter got bullied at school for our position."

Colorado Judge Takes a Katana to Boulder's AR-15 Ban

We touched on this back in 2018. Boulder, Colorado was pushing to ban owning AR-15 rifles. They’re c

townhall.com

If you need more than ten rounds to hit what your aiming at maybe you don't need a gun.

Wow....did you take all morning to come up with that stupid post?

Nope..about ten seconds to figure out why some people should not have guns...stop whining over not being able to have extended magazines. Go to the range and learn how to hit what your aiming at with the first shot

Shit head...we aren't talking extended magazines.......millions of pistols come with magazines that hold 12-19 rounds.....standard.

Since you posted what you just posted, you reveal yourself to be an idiot....but thanks for postin...

 

[August West]

We don`t need no stinking background checks. Just open up enough car doors and you`ll have one. I wonder if these guns are now in the hands of criminals?
Metro Police: 12 guns stolen from vehicles last week | News | wsmv.com

Yeah.....shitheads like you have made almost every public space gun free zones by force of law...

Then, when normal gun owners have to leave their guns in their car to get grocery's, the criminals can steal them from their cars...

The solution is to get rid of gun free zones so normal Americans don't have to leave their guns in their cars...

You idiot.

Normal people don`t ride around with guns in their cars. Gun pussies do.

 

[Cecilie1200]

We don`t need no stinking background checks. Just open up enough car doors and you`ll have one. I wonder if these guns are now in the hands of criminals?
Metro Police: 12 guns stolen from vehicles last week | News | wsmv.com

Yeah.....shitheads like you have made almost every public space gun free zones by force of law...

Then, when normal gun owners have to leave their guns in their car to get grocery's, the criminals can steal them from their cars...

The solution is to get rid of gun free zones so normal Americans don't have to leave their guns in their cars...

You idiot.

Normal people don`t ride around with guns in their cars. Gun pussies do.

Normal people don't consider you to be a normal person, or to know anything about them.

 

[Vrenn]

Hey...Daryl hunt........you were saying about the colorado AR-15 ban?

Now, a Colorado judge has tossed the AR-15 ban in the trash bin, along with the provision prohibiting ownership of magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. That’s the backdoor gun ban right there. It’s not just about the rifle. It’s about curbing constitutional gun rights by these magazine laws.

A host of firearms that aren’t AR-15 rifles have magazines with more than 10 rounds. This law would effectively ban them too.


We all see what you’re doing here, liberal America (via Free Beacon):

A judge struck down Boulder, Colorado's ban on the possession of AR-15s and magazines holding more than 10 rounds on Monday.
Colorado state judge Andrew Hartman ruled the city's gun ban violated the state's preemption law, which prevents localities from imposing gun regulations above and beyond state law. Judge Hartman's ruling declares the ordinance invalid and immediately bars the city from enforcing the ban.
"The Court has determined that only Colorado state (or federal) law can prohibit the possession, sale, and transfer of assault weapons and large capacity magazines," Hartman wrote in the ruling.
The ruling is the latest in a string of victories for gun advocates who have used state preemption laws to overturn strict local gun regulations. A Washington court struck down a local ordinance on gun storage in February 2021, and a Pennsylvania court struck down Pittsburgh's attempt to regulate the use of AR-15s inside city limits in October 2019.
Jon Caldara, a longtime Boulder resident who openly flouted the AR-15 ban, said he was "thrilled" by the ruling. The former Denver Post columnist and Independence Institute president publicly announced he would not comply with the order to turn over his AR-15 or ammunition magazines when the ban was instituted in 2019. He filed a separate federal suit against the ordinance and said his family has received backlash from supporters ever since.
"I was probably the most publicly known criminal in Boulder," he told the Washington Free Beacon. "That made us social outcasts. And it was really bad. My daughter got bullied at school for our position."

Colorado Judge Takes a Katana to Boulder's AR-15 Ban

We touched on this back in 2018. Boulder, Colorado was pushing to ban owning AR-15 rifles. They’re c

townhall.com

If you need more than ten rounds to hit what your aiming at maybe you don't need a gun.

Wow....did you take all morning to come up with that stupid post?

Nope..about ten seconds to figure out why some people should not have guns...stop whining over not being able to have extended magazines. Go to the range and learn how to hit what your aiming at with the first shot

You've never been under fire. While I am not a proponent of large cap mags, I do know that you will probably need at least 3 to hit an actual bad guy to bring him down under pressure. Do you need thirty? No. Do you need 15, probably not but the courts have place the limits of 15. Not 10 but 15.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nope..about ten seconds to figure out why some people should not have guns...stop whining over not being able to have extended magazines. Go to the range and learn how to hit what your aiming at with the first shot

Spoken by yet another person that never shot a gun before. When confronted with danger, you don't have time to stand there, breathe in and breathe out concentrating on your target. Your life is on the line and you shoot as quickly and accurately was you can. Statistically even our highly trained police officers miss 50% of their shots at suspects. The more distance between you and your attacker, the more missed shots you will likely have.

Get your gun knowledge from somewhere else than a movie theater.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Nope..about ten seconds to figure out why some people should not have guns...stop whining over not being able to have extended magazines. Go to the range and learn how to hit what your aiming at with the first shot

Spoken by yet another person that never shot a gun before. When confronted with danger, you don't have time to stand there, breathe in and breathe out concentrating on your target. Your life is on the line and you shoot as quickly and accurately was you can. Statistically even our highly trained police officers miss 50% of their shots at suspects. The more distance between you and your attacker, the more missed shots you will likely have.

Get your gun knowledge from somewhere else than a movie theater.

And what the hell are you supposed to do if you have more than one assailant? Morph into Annie Oakley and take them all out with one shot each? Yeah, that'll happen.

 

[freyasman]

Hey...Daryl hunt........you were saying about the colorado AR-15 ban?

Now, a Colorado judge has tossed the AR-15 ban in the trash bin, along with the provision prohibiting ownership of magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. That’s the backdoor gun ban right there. It’s not just about the rifle. It’s about curbing constitutional gun rights by these magazine laws.

A host of firearms that aren’t AR-15 rifles have magazines with more than 10 rounds. This law would effectively ban them too.


We all see what you’re doing here, liberal America (via Free Beacon):

A judge struck down Boulder, Colorado's ban on the possession of AR-15s and magazines holding more than 10 rounds on Monday.
Colorado state judge Andrew Hartman ruled the city's gun ban violated the state's preemption law, which prevents localities from imposing gun regulations above and beyond state law. Judge Hartman's ruling declares the ordinance invalid and immediately bars the city from enforcing the ban.
"The Court has determined that only Colorado state (or federal) law can prohibit the possession, sale, and transfer of assault weapons and large capacity magazines," Hartman wrote in the ruling.
The ruling is the latest in a string of victories for gun advocates who have used state preemption laws to overturn strict local gun regulations. A Washington court struck down a local ordinance on gun storage in February 2021, and a Pennsylvania court struck down Pittsburgh's attempt to regulate the use of AR-15s inside city limits in October 2019.
Jon Caldara, a longtime Boulder resident who openly flouted the AR-15 ban, said he was "thrilled" by the ruling. The former Denver Post columnist and Independence Institute president publicly announced he would not comply with the order to turn over his AR-15 or ammunition magazines when the ban was instituted in 2019. He filed a separate federal suit against the ordinance and said his family has received backlash from supporters ever since.
"I was probably the most publicly known criminal in Boulder," he told the Washington Free Beacon. "That made us social outcasts. And it was really bad. My daughter got bullied at school for our position."

Colorado Judge Takes a Katana to Boulder's AR-15 Ban

We touched on this back in 2018. Boulder, Colorado was pushing to ban owning AR-15 rifles. They’re c

townhall.com

If you need more than ten rounds to hit what your aiming at maybe you don't need a gun.

If you think you know shit about shooting people and how all that works, you're ignorant. If you think you should have any say at all in what other people own or carry, you're ethically challenged and morally retarded.

Go ahead, keep posting like a simpleton and embarrassing yourself; it's funny to watch.

 

[freyasman]

Hey...Daryl hunt........you were saying about the colorado AR-15 ban?

Now, a Colorado judge has tossed the AR-15 ban in the trash bin, along with the provision prohibiting ownership of magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. That’s the backdoor gun ban right there. It’s not just about the rifle. It’s about curbing constitutional gun rights by these magazine laws.

A host of firearms that aren’t AR-15 rifles have magazines with more than 10 rounds. This law would effectively ban them too.


We all see what you’re doing here, liberal America (via Free Beacon):

A judge struck down Boulder, Colorado's ban on the possession of AR-15s and magazines holding more than 10 rounds on Monday.
Colorado state judge Andrew Hartman ruled the city's gun ban violated the state's preemption law, which prevents localities from imposing gun regulations above and beyond state law. Judge Hartman's ruling declares the ordinance invalid and immediately bars the city from enforcing the ban.
"The Court has determined that only Colorado state (or federal) law can prohibit the possession, sale, and transfer of assault weapons and large capacity magazines," Hartman wrote in the ruling.
The ruling is the latest in a string of victories for gun advocates who have used state preemption laws to overturn strict local gun regulations. A Washington court struck down a local ordinance on gun storage in February 2021, and a Pennsylvania court struck down Pittsburgh's attempt to regulate the use of AR-15s inside city limits in October 2019.
Jon Caldara, a longtime Boulder resident who openly flouted the AR-15 ban, said he was "thrilled" by the ruling. The former Denver Post columnist and Independence Institute president publicly announced he would not comply with the order to turn over his AR-15 or ammunition magazines when the ban was instituted in 2019. He filed a separate federal suit against the ordinance and said his family has received backlash from supporters ever since.
"I was probably the most publicly known criminal in Boulder," he told the Washington Free Beacon. "That made us social outcasts. And it was really bad. My daughter got bullied at school for our position."

Colorado Judge Takes a Katana to Boulder's AR-15 Ban

We touched on this back in 2018. Boulder, Colorado was pushing to ban owning AR-15 rifles. They’re c

townhall.com

If you need more than ten rounds to hit what your aiming at maybe you don't need a gun.

Wow....did you take all morning to come up with that stupid post?

Nope..about ten seconds to figure out why some people should not have guns...stop whining over not being able to have extended magazines. Go to the range and learn how to hit what your aiming at with the first shot

They're standard magazines, not "extended". They are the exact capacity the firearm was designed to use, standard, from the factory.
Using terms like "extended", or "high capacity" is an attempt to steer the narrative, and it's a sign of dishonesty on the part of the people using it.

You people simply can't be trusted. And you think we're going to disarm, or even gear down, knowing how untrustworthy and dishonest you are?
GTFOH

 

[freyasman]

We don`t need no stinking background checks. Just open up enough car doors and you`ll have one. I wonder if these guns are now in the hands of criminals?
Metro Police: 12 guns stolen from vehicles last week | News | wsmv.com

Yeah.....shitheads like you have made almost every public space gun free zones by force of law...

Then, when normal gun owners have to leave their guns in their car to get grocery's, the criminals can steal them from their cars...

The solution is to get rid of gun free zones so normal Americans don't have to leave their guns in their cars...

You idiot.

It's a vehicle, not a holster.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And what the hell are you supposed to do if you have more than one assailant? Morph into Annie Oakley and take them all out with one shot each? Yeah, that'll happen.

They are just puppets. Saying that less capacity magazines will do anything about crime in our country is like saying if we made beer with .01% less alcohol, that will stop drunk driving.

People like him never shot a gun in their lives and join in on a conversation that has a lot of gun owners and shooters, then make idiotic remarks like that trying to convince us they know what they are talking about.

But you know, I'm the kind of guy that believes in compromise. If the Democrats really believe that smaller magazines will solve all our gun problems, sign a contract with Republicans that states after we mandate all these smaller magazines, nobody will ever bring up a gun issue again as long as there's a Democrat party, and I'll support it.

 

[freyasman]

And what the hell are you supposed to do if you have more than one assailant? Morph into Annie Oakley and take them all out with one shot each? Yeah, that'll happen.

They are just puppets. Saying that less capacity magazines will do anything about crime in our country is like saying if we made beer with .01% less alcohol, that will stop drunk driving.

People like him never shot a gun in their lives and join in on a conversation that has a lot of gun owners and shooters, then make idiotic remarks like that trying to convince us they know what they are talking about.

But you know, I'm the kind of guy that believes in compromise. If the Democrats really believe that smaller magazines will solve all our gun problems, sign a contract with Republicans that states after we mandate all these smaller magazines, nobody will ever bring up a gun issue again as long as there's a Democrat party, and I'll support it.

No.


They can't be dealt with in any way; they can't be trusted.

They will always lie, and they will never honor any agreements. Treat them accordingly.


Tell them "No." and kill them when they disregard that.

 

[Cecilie1200]

And what the hell are you supposed to do if you have more than one assailant? Morph into Annie Oakley and take them all out with one shot each? Yeah, that'll happen.

They are just puppets. Saying that less capacity magazines will do anything about crime in our country is like saying if we made beer with .01% less alcohol, that will stop drunk driving.

People like him never shot a gun in their lives and join in on a conversation that has a lot of gun owners and shooters, then make idiotic remarks like that trying to convince us they know what they are talking about.

But you know, I'm the kind of guy that believes in compromise. If the Democrats really believe that smaller magazines will solve all our gun problems, sign a contract with Republicans that states after we mandate all these smaller magazines, nobody will ever bring up a gun issue again as long as there's a Democrat party, and I'll support it.

I gotta say, I'm with Freya on this: you could get Democrats to sign that deal in blood, and I STILL wouldn't trust them to leave it alone. Also, I'm not even remotely willing to leave even one small aspect of my decisions on protecting myself up to them. My safety is not an issue to be decided by committee, because I'M the only one who's going to have to live with the results.

I'm not a gun enthusiast, or a hunter, or any of those other things. My perspective is that of a woman who once had her life threatened by a murderer on a dark street, with no help anywhere in sight, and got away only by the grace of God. I don't have any of the fancy stats, or encyclopedic knowledge of various types, or categorical memorization of laws in different states. I know how to put a bullet where I aim it. I also know this: I will never have to depend on only the grace of God to get away safely ever, ever again. And it's not up for compromise.

 

[freyasman]

And what the hell are you supposed to do if you have more than one assailant? Morph into Annie Oakley and take them all out with one shot each? Yeah, that'll happen.

They are just puppets. Saying that less capacity magazines will do anything about crime in our country is like saying if we made beer with .01% less alcohol, that will stop drunk driving.

People like him never shot a gun in their lives and join in on a conversation that has a lot of gun owners and shooters, then make idiotic remarks like that trying to convince us they know what they are talking about.

But you know, I'm the kind of guy that believes in compromise. If the Democrats really believe that smaller magazines will solve all our gun problems, sign a contract with Republicans that states after we mandate all these smaller magazines, nobody will ever bring up a gun issue again as long as there's a Democrat party, and I'll support it.

I gotta say, I'm with Freya on this: you could get Democrats to sign that deal in blood, and I STILL wouldn't trust them to leave it alone. Also, I'm not even remotely willing to leave even one small aspect of my decisions on protecting myself up to them. My safety is not an issue to be decided by committee, because I'M the only one who's going to have to live with the results.

I'm not a gun enthusiast, or a hunter, or any of those other things. My perspective is that of a woman who once had her life threatened by a murderer on a dark street, with no help anywhere in sight, and got away only by the grace of God. I don't have any of the fancy stats, or encyclopedic knowledge of various types, or categorical memorization of laws in different states. I know how to put a bullet where I aim it. I also know this: I will never have to depend on only the grace of God to get away safely ever, ever again. And it's not up for compromise.

Guns are good, but don't forget that nothing says; "Get your hands off me!!" like a face full of pepper spray and a shank to the scrotum.

You can't put a tourniquet on the taint.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I gotta say, I'm with Freya on this: you could get Democrats to sign that deal in blood, and I STILL wouldn't trust them to leave it alone. Also, I'm not even remotely willing to leave even one small aspect of my decisions on protecting myself up to them. My safety is not an issue to be decided by committee, because I'M the only one who's going to have to live with the results.

I'm not a gun enthusiast, or a hunter, or any of those other things. My perspective is that of a woman who once had her life threatened by a murderer on a dark street, with no help anywhere in sight, and got away only by the grace of God. I don't have any of the fancy stats, or encyclopedic knowledge of various types, or categorical memorization of laws in different states. I know how to put a bullet where I aim it. I also know this: I will never have to depend on only the grace of God to get away safely ever, ever again. And it's not up for compromise.

You, I, and anybody that's pro-gun knows the Democrats would never sign anything like that. It would only be a dog and pony show to demonstrate to the public that smaller magazines is just one stepping stone to their ultimate goal of a disarmed public. In other words, to show people they would never stop at smaller magazines and be happy with that.

So we don't compromise, but make it look like we are trying to compromise and they are refusing to meet us half-way.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No.


They can't be dealt with in any way; they can't be trusted.

They will always lie, and they will never honor any agreements. Treat them accordingly.


Tell them "No." and kill them when they disregard that.

With a normal divided government, we could just say no. My fear is however that they have all the poker chips now. They run the entire federal government. They can make any laws they want and we could only hope the courts side with us when we challenge them. And to be honest, I really lost trust in our courts even though we have the upper hand. Kavanaugh has proved to be a great disappointment and that goes double for Benedict Roberts.

 

[freyasman]

No.


They can't be dealt with in any way; they can't be trusted.

They will always lie, and they will never honor any agreements. Treat them accordingly.


Tell them "No." and kill them when they disregard that.

With a normal divided government, we could just say no. My fear is however that they have all the poker chips now. They run the entire federal government. They can make any laws they want and we could only hope the courts side with us when we challenge them. And to be honest, I really lost trust in our courts even though we have the upper hand. Kavanaugh has proved to be a great disappointment and that goes double for Benedict Roberts.

You're still thinking about courts and laws?


TINVOWOOT

 

[woodwork201]

Just like in Prohibition, when you try to make something like drugs illegal, all it does is jack up prices and make it more enticing.
The other causes of crime are unfair law, unfair poverty, lack of opportunity, education too expensive, no unions, etc.
The number of guns has nothing to do with the amount of crime, because criminals always get guns if they want them, because they will get them illegally.

In one breath, you speak like a conservative and then you follow it up with pure socialism.

What laws are unfair? Name some.

What is unfair about poverty? Poverty is a choice. I was poor as a kid, very poor, but I worked hard to get the skills to get ahead. My mother chose to be poor when I was a kid and I chose to not be. We both made choices. Poverty is a choice.

Education is not at all too expensive. What it actually is, is too inexpensive. When people have to work for something, to earn it, they'll appreciate it and take advantage of it. Education is a perfect example of that. Kids go through 12 years of free government education and, when it's all over, they cannot read, cannot write, cannot do very basic and simple mathematics. Government needs to stay out of it - at least more than local/community government.

Unions? I'm indifferent to the concept. The reality is that unions are very corrupt and their leaders are simply revenuers for the DNC. On the other hand, it is unions that got us the 40-hour workweek that we all enjoy. Corporations control the jobs and then want to negotiate with employees individually. Giving the employees a way to control the labor and they can negotiate on a more even keel - big labor versus big jobs. Then again, many do well without a union. But lack of unions has nothing to do with crime - other than that more unions leads to more financial crimes. Criminals don't work; don't have jobs, and would not have any use for a union.

 

[woodwork201]

No.


They can't be dealt with in any way; they can't be trusted.

They will always lie, and they will never honor any agreements. Treat them accordingly.


Tell them "No." and kill them when they disregard that.

With a normal divided government, we could just say no. My fear is however that they have all the poker chips now. They run the entire federal government. They can make any laws they want and we could only hope the courts side with us when we challenge them. And to be honest, I really lost trust in our courts even though we have the upper hand. Kavanaugh has proved to be a great disappointment and that goes double for Benedict Roberts.

Don't forget Gorsuch - who once claimed original intent and the meaning of words at the time of passing a law counted and then threw that all out when he decided that protection from discrimination based on sex included discrimination based on a person's favorite sexual position or perversions.

 

[woodwork201]

It means our deterrents are not strong enough. The solution? Make them stronger.

That's right. Gangs, whether white, black, latino, or other, view prison time as the men's club time. They know that most of them will get out so it's like training camp for them. The hard-core lifers are the camp counselors but they can kill you when you can't master the skill.

It needs to be a far more miserable experience than it is. Sheriff-Arpaio-style meals and work camps. Actually, I think he was far too easy on prisoners but it would be a good start.