Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chanceGreat. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.Garland was an activist judge.Total nonsense.He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.1. That's a lie.Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.You have yet to show me where I said that.You said a vote is in the Constitution
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Spin whatever crap you want, but
1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that
2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS
There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
2. Not the issue.
The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
I asked colfax to just state his standard he'd apply to both parties equally. He melted down and had a hissy fit. He still refuses to answer the question