Collins wants republicans to vote for her but she wants the next SC pick to be democrat!?

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
60,780
Reaction score
10,456
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
I asked colfax to just state his standard he'd apply to both parties equally. He melted down and had a hissy fit. He still refuses to answer the question
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,252
Reaction score
9,236
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
looks like President Trump will be setting a record for Supreme Court appointments
3 his first term and possibly 2 more his second term lol
The Trump Court lol
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,252
Reaction score
9,236
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong.
during an election year when they controlled the senate and was a Republican president? link please
However we didn't have a ruthless party division we have now we didn't impeach for political reasons we didn't start off the new administration even before they took oath of office which impeachment we didn't create evidence that lead to a schiff sham.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
I asked colfax to just state his standard he'd apply to both parties equally. He melted down and had a hissy fit. He still refuses to answer the question
You’ve proven you don’t deserve to be treated as a serious person.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong.
during an election year when they controlled the senate and was a Republican president? link please
Since when does that matter? Clearly being an election year makes no difference in confirming SCOTUS judges.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
looks like President Trump will be setting a record for Supreme Court appointments
3 his first term and possibly 2 more his second term lol
The Trump Court lol
Better pray you keep the Senate.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,252
Reaction score
9,236
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong.
during an election year when they controlled the senate and was a Republican president? link please
Since when does that matter? Clearly being an election year makes no difference in confirming SCOTUS judges.
still waiting on your link
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong.
during an election year when they controlled the senate and was a Republican president? link please
Since when does that matter? Clearly being an election year makes no difference in confirming SCOTUS judges.
still waiting on your link
You’re asking for a link to something I never claimed.

Drop the election year nonsense. It doesn’t matter and we all know it. Only idiots ever believed that made an ounce of difference.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,252
Reaction score
9,236
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong.
during an election year when they controlled the senate and was a Republican president? link please
Since when does that matter? Clearly being an election year makes no difference in confirming SCOTUS judges.
still waiting on your link
You’re asking for a link to something I never claimed.

Drop the election year nonsense. It doesn’t matter and we all know it. Only idiots ever believed that made an ounce of difference.
here's what you said
"Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong."
LINK NOW OR SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LIES.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,252
Reaction score
9,236
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
looks like President Trump will be setting a record for Supreme Court appointments
3 his first term and possibly 2 more his second term lol
The Trump Court lol
Better pray you keep the Senate.
huh I scared
Should be. If you weren’t, you wouldn’t be advocating ramming through a SCOTUS nominee by a bunch of lame ducks.
Nope not the least bit am I concerned I want this because it's payback and it's pissing you leftists off bigly
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
You said a vote is in the Constitution
You have yet to show me where I said that.
I've repeatedly shown you that. Dementia much? Joe Biden? Is that you?
Nope. You never have. You showed me statements of me saying something entirely different.
Spin whatever crap you want, but

1) No one including Biden and McConnell ever said they wouldn't confirm their own party's nominee in an election year. Note unlike fundamentally dishonest liars like you and RW, I'm saying I know Biden didn't mean that

2) Obama was afforded his full constitutional rights. He made a nomination to the SCOTUS

There is no issue other than in your hysterical chick mind that you wwwwhhhhaaaaaaaa-nt it
1. That's a lie.
2. Not the issue.

The Senate never rejected Garland. You lied and are too cowardly to admit it.
He was so unacceptable to the party controlling the Senate, they didn't bother to waste time with hearings or a vote.
Total nonsense.

Garland never had a vote because he was qualified and would have been confirmed.
Garland was an activist judge.
Republicans held the Senate, so they didn't have to vote on him.
Great. So now the precedent is that judges are only confirmed when the Senate is controlled by the president’s party.

Can you idiots stop turning our country into a shithole?
Democrats would do the same shit if they had the chance
Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong.
during an election year when they controlled the senate and was a Republican president? link please
Since when does that matter? Clearly being an election year makes no difference in confirming SCOTUS judges.
still waiting on your link
You’re asking for a link to something I never claimed.

Drop the election year nonsense. It doesn’t matter and we all know it. Only idiots ever believed that made an ounce of difference.
here's what you said
"Democrats have confirmed a dozen SCOTUS judges nominated by Republicans since WW2. So you’re just wrong."
LINK NOW OR SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR LIES.

Good lord. No need to have a tantrum.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
looks like President Trump will be setting a record for Supreme Court appointments
3 his first term and possibly 2 more his second term lol
The Trump Court lol
Better pray you keep the Senate.
huh I scared
Should be. If you weren’t, you wouldn’t be advocating ramming through a SCOTUS nominee by a bunch of lame ducks.
Nope not the least bit am I concerned I want this because it's payback and it's pissing you leftists off bigly
Ah, don’t you love how fucked up our country has become?

You’ve let these assholes in office turn your into a small, petty man. Stop letting them manipulate you.
 

j-mac

Nuthin' but the truth
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
3,659
Reaction score
1,473
Points
210
Location
South Carolina
I’m truly dumbfounded that a woman who wants to win republican votes won’t vote to take control of the the most important seat to protect the Constitution.
she’s going to get smoked in Maine, I wouldn’t vote for that that fraud.
The pure duplicitous,hutspa of this woman...Another swamp critter that needs to go.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
16,577
Reaction score
4,500
Points
150
What does an election year have to do with filling a SCOTUS seat?
Explain it to Merrick Garland

Game, Set, Match.....Thanks for playing
Merrick Garland was rejected. Game, Set, Match.
He was Borked.

Bork was rejected by a vote of 58-42. What was the vote for Garland? There was none. Mitch was too cowardly to allow it.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top