How are"we" not addressing the problem?So, your argument is that if the house is already on fire, what we should do is pour on a gallon of gasoline. Hard to point our finger at them when we are failing to address the problem.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How are"we" not addressing the problem?So, your argument is that if the house is already on fire, what we should do is pour on a gallon of gasoline. Hard to point our finger at them when we are failing to address the problem.
But if the 1% can make more money, the "Conservatives" here are just fine with that.
It's crazy that the world was 2C warmer with 120 ppm less CO2, right?
But you believe that if the planet has more CO2 it should be warmer, right?Maybe you should be telling these things to both Xi Jinping and Ram Nath Kovind. I'm sure that they will carefully listen to you you and still go on their merry ways.
No matter what we do the CO2 and CH4 will continue to rise. It not only due to world manufacturing. There are many factors involved and America cannot solve it alone.
Many factors for what? That less CO2 led to warmer temperatures? I'm all ears? Please do tell me about it.There are many factors involved and America cannot solve it alone.
Please show us your reliable source and working links proving that we are rapidly warning. As you know we are not.The previous interglacial had, at it's peak, 300 ppm of CO2, and about 700 ppb of CH4. At present, we are at 410+ ppm of CO2 and 1450+ ppb of CH4. The only reason we are not much warmer than we are at present is the thermal inertia of our oceans. However, we are rapidly warming, and what is already in the pipeline will put us well above the previous temperatures. One must also remember that at only a 20 PPM increase, the sea levels were about 20 feet higher.
~~~~~~Many factors for what? That less CO2 led to warmer temperatures? I'm all ears? Please do tell me about it.
Or is it that the many factors is that the US is not the problem with CO2 emissions so we'd have to help pay for other countries to reduce their CO2?
~~~~~~
Look at it this way:
With all that ice it will cool the oceans again.
Scientists warn Antarctic glacier could collapse, raise sea levels at least a foot
Scientists are warning an Antarctic glacier could collapse and cause sea levels to raise at least a foot in the next decade. The scientists said Monday at the American Geophysical Union&n…thehill.com
Pure bullshit. No nation is putting in more renewables than China. Unfortunately, no nation is burning more coal than China. As they try to meet the rising expectations of the populace, they need more energy. An unfortunate box they have themselves in, because no nation is suffering more from a changing climate than China.Please show us your reliable source and working links proving that we are rapidly warning. As you know we are not.
As you know too, the USA could halt the production of all greenhouse gases and that wouldn't affect the world one iota.
China has hundreds of ultra-clean coal plants under construction and in planning. They also have more nuclear power plants under construction and in the planning stage than the rest of the world combined.
China learned from us that vital to a strong economy is cheap, plentiful energy. China is rapidly moving in that direction all while the Democrats, led by the far-left, are pushing and shoving us toward far more expensive energy and less reliable grids.
Not at all surprising. I ask one question and you throw up a bunch of stuff totally unrelated to the issue being discussed.Pure bullshit. No nation is putting in more renewables than China. Unfortunately, no nation is burning more coal than China. As they try to meet the rising expectations of the populace, they need more energy. An unfortunate box they have themselves in, because no nation is suffering more from a changing climate than China.
If we stopped producing GHGs, that would be the second biggest emitter of GHGs gone down to zero. China is #1, US is #2, and India is #3.
Even factoring in grid scale energy storage, renewables, solar and wind, and now the least expensive form of new generation.
View attachment 577729
OK.Not at all surprising. I ask one question and you throw up a bunch of stuff totally unrelated to the issue being discussed.
No one said China was not producing and using every possible form of energy.
Allow me to bring you back to the request you ignored. "Please show us your reliable source and working links proving that we are rapidly warning. As you know we are not."
There is no argument.So, your argument is that if the house is already on fire, what we should do is pour on a gallon of gasoline. Hard to point our finger at them when we are failing to address the problem.
Then so are we, as we are the #2 emitter of GHGs.There is no argument.
That fact is that India and China are giving everyone else THE MIDDLE FINGER.
The entire Green Talk is bullshit since it costs way more to be green until we figure out the technology.Then so are we, as we are the #2 emitter of GHGs.
Not at all surprising. I ask one question and you throw up a bunch of stuff totally unrelated to the issue being discussed.
No one said China was not producing and using every possible form of energy.
Allow me to bring you back to the request you ignored. "Please show us your reliable source and working links proving that we are rapidly warning. As you know we are not."
Sounds like the good ol' democrat mantra. Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda while the ones sounding the alarm the loudest are buying beachfront in MA and FL. We hear the same thing with covid. Estimations and projections. BS. Show some facts and some leaders that believe and practice what they are trying to convince everyone else to do.he estimates
You still refuse to answer the question. Why not just say you lied in a futile attempt to make a false point?OK.
Abstract
Climate change is a critical factor affecting biodiversity. However, the quantitative relationship between temperature change and extinction is unclear. Here, we analyze magnitudes and rates of temperature change and extinction rates of marine fossils through the past 450 million years (Myr). The results show that both the rate and magnitude of temperature change are significantly positively correlated with the extinction rate of marine animals. Major mass extinctions in the Phanerozoic can be linked to thresholds in climate change (warming or cooling) that equate to magnitudes >5.2 °C and rates >10 °C/Myr. The significant relationship between temperature change and extinction still exists when we exclude the five largest mass extinctions of the Phanerozoic. Our findings predict that a temperature increase of 5.2 °C above the pre-industrial level at present rates of increase would likely result in mass extinction comparable to that of the major Phanerozoic events, even without other, non-climatic anthropogenic impacts.
Thresholds of temperature change for mass extinctions - Nature Communications
The linkage between temperature change and extinction rates in the fossil record is well-known qualitatively but little explored quantitatively. Here the authors investigate the relationship of marine animal extinctions with rate and magnitude of temperature change across the last 450 million...www.nature.com