CNN has reported Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe to police

[OldLady]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

Well that would defeat security for any online meeting, so I doubt if that's true.

it's true.

How to Record Zoom Meetings W or W/O Permissions [4 Ways]

When in need of a recording for meetings, Zoom has two methods to choose from. The local recording is offered for free also a cloud recording is for price.

filmora.wondershare.com

Wow! I just googled it too! So there is no such thing as a secure meeting on the net. Good to know!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

And yet, here you are, crying over an election that is finished, in which Biden won decisively. Covid 45 lost, champ. Get over it.

If it's over why hasn't the electoral college certified Corrupt Joe as the president?

Clearly you are too ignorant or too dishonest to know/admit the truth.

 

[Norman]

Didn't he get in trouble before for something like this? He can apparently afford go

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

Well that would defeat security for any online meeting, so I doubt if that's true.

it's true.

How to Record Zoom Meetings W or W/O Permissions [4 Ways]

When in need of a recording for meetings, Zoom has two methods to choose from. The local recording is offered for free also a cloud recording is for price.

filmora.wondershare.com

Wow! I just googled it too! So there is no such thing as a secure meeting on the net. Good to know!

No there isn't...

... and I would push it further, there is no such thing as a secure meeting. Anyone can record anything in any meeting.

 

[iceberg]

Didn't he get in trouble before for something like this? He can apparently afford go

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

Well that would defeat security for any online meeting, so I doubt if that's true.

it's true.

How to Record Zoom Meetings W or W/O Permissions [4 Ways]

When in need of a recording for meetings, Zoom has two methods to choose from. The local recording is offered for free also a cloud recording is for price.

filmora.wondershare.com

Wow! I just googled it too! So there is no such thing as a secure meeting on the net. Good to know!

just be careful with your invites and check who attends. you can have meetings that change the link as well if you want. but if someone on the inside simply FW'd this out, not much you can do but find the person and fire them.

 

[Care4all]

Transparency is obviously NOT something CNN supports....

As my momma used to say, 'Never say anything about anyone in private you would not want to say to them to their face'....

I have no problem with what the Cnn guy said.... It's discussed openly on their channel and other news stations amongst each other.... how to handle a prolific liar type of thing.....

 

[easyt65]

Democrats continue to get caught in embarrassing 'hot mic' incidents and then cry like a bit@h and point fingers as an attempted diversion from whatthey were caught doing / saying....

SSDD...

 

[iceberg]

Democrats continue to get caught in embarrassing 'hot mic' incidents and then cry like a bit@h and point fingers as an attempted diversion from whatthey were caught doing / saying....

SSDD...

maybe. and like i said, i am no fan of CNN and think they need to go out of business. but this isn't a proper way to address your problems with someone.

what they got "caught" saying - is ANYONE surprised? this isn't the first time they've been caught saying outlandish anti-trump crap. it's just that no one cares.

 

[bripat9643]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.

Well, that's a legal nicety, but the fact is, I doubt such software would defeat secured content.

you'd be surprised. i showed a link with many ways to do it. at the end of the day what is to stop me from putting my phone on a stand and simply recording my screen that way?

then again if this was a phone call, tons of apps that would allow it.

that said - i still don't think it's legal or right to do it to someone. 2 different issues. can you / should you?

it's perfectly OK to do it to Zucker or CNN.

 

[iceberg]

Transparency is obviously NOT something CNN supports....

As my momma used to say, 'Never say anything about anyone in private you would not want to say to them to their face'....

I have no problem with what the Cnn guy said.... It's discussed openly on their channel and other news stations amongst each other.... how to handle a prolific liar type of thing.....

great now how do they handle themselves as they are lying cause they don't like trump and want to make sure he's presented how they wish him to be.

you don't see me defending veritas here because they were wrong. period. by law as far as i know. so to see you defend CNN and their antics to attack trump - well that simply isn't being consistent with how you apply standards.

and this is why we're so divided.

i hate CNN with a white hot passion of a thousand dying suns crying out in agony as they explode in a super nova to end all super novas, creating new universes billions of light years away eventually...

but they still have equal treatment under the law cause my emotions do not come into play in that regard and no ones should be.

 

[iceberg]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.

Well, that's a legal nicety, but the fact is, I doubt such software would defeat secured content.

you'd be surprised. i showed a link with many ways to do it. at the end of the day what is to stop me from putting my phone on a stand and simply recording my screen that way?

then again if this was a phone call, tons of apps that would allow it.

that said - i still don't think it's legal or right to do it to someone. 2 different issues. can you / should you?

it's perfectly OK to do it to Zucker or CNN.

i obviously disagree or you're saying its perfectly ok to do it to trump cause you hate him.

 

[bripat9643]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

Well that would defeat security for any online meeting, so I doubt if that's true.

it's true.

How to Record Zoom Meetings W or W/O Permissions [4 Ways]

When in need of a recording for meetings, Zoom has two methods to choose from. The local recording is offered for free also a cloud recording is for price.

filmora.wondershare.com

Wow! I just googled it too! So there is no such thing as a secure meeting on the net. Good to know!

It's only as secure as the people you give the connection info to can be trusted.

 

[bripat9643]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.

Well, that's a legal nicety, but the fact is, I doubt such software would defeat secured content.

you'd be surprised. i showed a link with many ways to do it. at the end of the day what is to stop me from putting my phone on a stand and simply recording my screen that way?

then again if this was a phone call, tons of apps that would allow it.

that said - i still don't think it's legal or right to do it to someone. 2 different issues. can you / should you?

it's perfectly OK to do it to Zucker or CNN.

i obviously disagree or you're saying its perfectly ok to do it to trump cause you hate him.

Zucker and CNN are the scum of the earth. They aren't entitled to any civilized niceties, especially if they are legal.

 

[OldLady]

Transparency is obviously NOT something CNN supports....

As my momma used to say, 'Never say anything about anyone in private you would not want to say to them to their face'....

I ave no problem with what the Cnn guy said.... It's discussed openly on their channel and other news stations amongst each other.... how to handle a prolific liar type of thing.....

Yeah, big whoop, actually.

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

Well that would defeat security for any online meeting, so I doubt if that's true.

it's true.

How to Record Zoom Meetings W or W/O Permissions [4 Ways]

When in need of a recording for meetings, Zoom has two methods to choose from. The local recording is offered for free also a cloud recording is for price.

filmora.wondershare.com

Wow! I just googled it too! So there is no such thing as a secure meeting on the net. Good to know!

It's only as secure as the people you give the connection info to can be trusted.

Yeah, to me that is much more surprising than anything Zuckerberg said.

Do you know how much copyrighted material is on the net? You are supposed to pay for these trainings and even college courses. And anyone who has paid can copy it and share it with friends for free.

 

[OldLady]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.

Well, that's a legal nicety, but the fact is, I doubt such software would defeat secured content.

you'd be surprised. i showed a link with many ways to do it. at the end of the day what is to stop me from putting my phone on a stand and simply recording my screen that way?

then again if this was a phone call, tons of apps that would allow it.

that said - i still don't think it's legal or right to do it to someone. 2 different issues. can you / should you?

it's perfectly OK to do it to Zucker or CNN.

i obviously disagree or you're saying its perfectly ok to do it to trump cause you hate him.

Zucker and CNN are the scum of the earth. They aren't entitled to any civilized niceties, especially if they are legal.

It definitely isn't legal. Hope that sneaky asswipe goes to jail over this nothingburger.

 

[iceberg]

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.

Well, that's a legal nicety, but the fact is, I doubt such software would defeat secured content.

you'd be surprised. i showed a link with many ways to do it. at the end of the day what is to stop me from putting my phone on a stand and simply recording my screen that way?

then again if this was a phone call, tons of apps that would allow it.

that said - i still don't think it's legal or right to do it to someone. 2 different issues. can you / should you?

it's perfectly OK to do it to Zucker or CNN.

i obviously disagree or you're saying its perfectly ok to do it to trump cause you hate him.

Zucker and CNN are the scum of the earth. They aren't entitled to any civilized niceties, especially if they are legal.

i disagree and will leave it at that.

 

[Winston]

Do they have any evidence of a crime?

Recording a call is perfectly legal in Georgia.

It was a private conversation, held out of the public view, and O'Keefe would have had to have the permission of all the parties involved for it to be legal. He is toast.

Wrong again!

Open meeting where anyone could attend by calling in. They had the permission of an authroized participant to listen in. CNN can eat the shit they have been spreading...

This is making no sense to me. If it was an open meeting that anyone, including you and I, could join, why is O Keefe going on as if he's got some big secret to spill? And obviously O'Keefe wasn't authorized or Zuckerberg would have known O'Keefe was listening and recording the conferences all those months. Nice try of submitting a defense for trespassing and who knows what else, but you ought to stick to your day job. I think your legal skills are a little weak.

From the article in the OP,

The calls O'Keefe had been listening to over two months are the network's daily 9am editorial meeting with senior staff from CNN's main bureaus,

A private business meeting. O'Keefe would have had to have EVERYONE"S permission to legally tape those calls per Georgia law.

 

[iceberg]

Transparency is obviously NOT something CNN supports....

As my momma used to say, 'Never say anything about anyone in private you would not want to say to them to their face'....

I ave no problem with what the Cnn guy said.... It's discussed openly on their channel and other news stations amongst each other.... how to handle a prolific liar type of thing.....

Yeah, big whoop, actually.

These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9007943/CNN-threatens-legal-action-against-Project-Veritas-leaked-clips-Jeff-Zuckers-conferences.html​

​

'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them' ​

​

​

I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.

So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.

then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.

who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.

Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.

No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.

You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.

Well that would defeat security for any online meeting, so I doubt if that's true.

it's true.

How to Record Zoom Meetings W or W/O Permissions [4 Ways]

When in need of a recording for meetings, Zoom has two methods to choose from. The local recording is offered for free also a cloud recording is for price.

filmora.wondershare.com

Wow! I just googled it too! So there is no such thing as a secure meeting on the net. Good to know!

It's only as secure as the people you give the connection info to can be trusted.

Yeah, to me that is much more surprising than anything Zuckerberg said.

Do you know how much copyrighted material is on the net? You are supposed to pay for these trainings and even college courses. And anyone who has paid can copy it and share it with friends for free.

pretty much killed small bands who used to be able to sell their music. honor system only goes so far.

 

[westwall]

I remember when the left used to protect whistle blowers. Now they persecute them.

Lt Col Vindman would like a word with you

You mean the Ukrainisn defence minister?

No I mean the decorated veteran who risked his career to blow the whistle on Impeached 45’s attempt at bribing a foreign nation to interfere in a US election.

Hmmm, it seems to me that when I watched the assholes testimony, he was far more concerned about the impact of Trumps decisions on Ukraine, than what they meant for the USA.

 

[westwall]

Do they have any evidence of a crime?

Recording a call is perfectly legal in Georgia.

It was a private conversation, held out of the public view, and O'Keefe would have had to have the permission of all the parties involved for it to be legal. He is toast.

Wrong again!

Open meeting where anyone could attend by calling in. They had the permission of an authroized participant to listen in. CNN can eat the shit they have been spreading...

This is making no sense to me. If it was an open meeting that anyone, including you and I, could join, why is O Keefe going on as if he's got some big secret to spill? And obviously O'Keefe wasn't authorized or Zuckerberg would have known O'Keefe was listening and recording the conferences all those months. Nice try of submitting a defense for trespassing and who knows what else, but you ought to stick to your day job. I think your legal skills are a little weak.

From the article in the OP,

The calls O'Keefe had been listening to over two months are the network's daily 9am editorial meeting with senior staff from CNN's main bureaus,

A private business meeting. O'Keefe would have had to have EVERYONE"S permission to legally tape those calls per Georgia law.

Depends on where he is listening from. State laws vary. And, if he was invited to listen in, as seems likely, then the clinton news network hasn't got a leg to stand on.

 

[Winston]

It's about time this purveyor of fake news and made up stories gets his ass handed to him...with prejudice.
And I'm not sure what's so scandalous about any of this?

It just shows the utter hypocrisy of the authoritarian left who have always protected and venerated whistle
blowers....until they are the ones being exposed.

No surprise for most people who know the double standard the left operates on.

It is stupid as hell to claim O'Keefe, or some inside person he might gotten access through is a whistleblower. A whistleblower is someone who uncovers a person or organization involved in illegal activities. Last I check there is no damn requirement for news sources to be unbiased. Hell, if there was you right wing nutcases would not have any place to get your news.