I ignored your question because they are stupid, just like their author.
There is a lot you know nothing about, so why not just shut up and keep that little secret to yourself?
No, you ignored them, because you are a sissy. You , despite your bluster, actually agree with some degree of gun control. And you know why we need it and what its positive effects are. But you'd rather throw your little hissy than admit it.
What are the positive effects? Apparently the guns used in last night's shooting were illegal.
Did the law prevent that from happening?
Unlike most people, I am around automatic weapons on a regular basis because of my work with the military. There are good points and bad points to the use of each, which is why the M-4 does not have the full auto capability of its predecessor the M-16.
Last night the shooter was employing automatic weapons by what is called "spray and pray", that being spray down an area with bullets and pray you hit something. Aiming an automatic weapon other than just in the general direction of your target is almost completely useless. Why do you think snipers prefer bolt action or semi-automatic rifles? Accuracy!
At best, only a small percentage of those shot last night were actually targeted. He was likely firing blindly in the direction of the crowd and that was all.
"What are the positive effects?"
Well, let's go back to square one, then:
So, a little quiz: if we just repealed the laws banning/controlling automatic weapons, would the result be:
a) more automatic weapons
b) same number
c) fewer
And, if you make it past that grueling question and got the correct answer, would the result then be:
a) more mass shootings and/or more dead people in each mass shooting
b) no change
c) fewer deaths and/or mass shootings, because we'll all be safer at this point, given the proliferation of automatic weapons
Taaaaaake your time...