- Sep 16, 2012
- 60,939
- 54,891
- 3,605
An army of what?I was referring to YOU nitwit. Stop with the straw-men. . . keep it up, or you will have an army of them doing your bidding.You're so right.Oh, settle down. Jesus.Since when are colleges and Universities supposed to be places of honest debate? Since when are social media platforms supposed to be places of open and honest debate? Since when are public gatherings supposed to be places of open and honest debate? wth? right? This ain't no free society, what a silly concept.Since when is a political debate board meant to be a magazine or newspaper? That's just silly.How illiberal of you.The Desk of Donald J. Trump is limited — users can’t comment or engage with the actual posts beyond sharing them to other platforms, an action few people do, according to the data.
On another board, a Trump idolator is copying everyone of T****'s postings from that blog. It's like that guy a couple years ago that kept posting all the Nigerian news--remember him? I'm trying to get the blog thread pulled on rule violations. No comments by poster, no discussion except people stopping by to say Fuck T****.
It's a work around, an advertisement. If people want to read his garbage, they can go to his blog. I can see copying a specific entry if you have something intelligent to say about it, but just spreading this has-been's puke should be a copyright infringement or SOMETHING.
Journalism is reporting. Editorializing is opining on events. So you are advocating for editorializing, but against journalism.
Interesting.
. . . yeah, you're right. We need to get into all areas of public engagement and close down society wherever and whenever we can.
Sharing of information and freethinking are a threat to oligarchic collectivism, and thus, Big Brother and the Nanny must shut that shit down, eh?
No one is trying to shut down his blog, but copying it whole just to spread it on another site because he was very appropriately banned from spreading lies on FB is sleazy. I suppose that's fitting considering who it is.
At any rate, once again you are blown into the stratosphere screeching the end of the world over one very simple, clear situation that has nothing to do with all your philosophical dump.