Climate Crisis Is Not Global Warming, It Is Cooling

Having problems with empirical evidence and facts again?
No jackass, i am on the right side of facts, history, and science. You are part of a tiny cadre of denier morons that only exists in the republican party of the united states.

Glad that's settled...
 
Excellent article ... Dr. Winters hits all the important points .
False. He has no idea what he is talking about.

Winters has zero trainng or education in climate science. He has conducted no research in climate acience and has never published a single, peer reviewed research paper on any climate topic.

If Winters, a paid denier, were seriously and honestly interested in understanding or debating climate science, he would be conducting research, publishing peer reviewed scientific articles, and debating climate scientists.

Instead, he is taking money to write denier blogs for gullible deniers who, despite the overwheloming preponderance of the global scientific community agreeing with the accepted consensus, think he is credible due to being a PhD in a non-climate field.
 
Excellent article ... Dr. Winters hits all the important points .
False. He has no idea what he is talking about.
Winters has zero trainng or education in climate science. He has conducted no research in climate acience and has never published a single, peer reviewed research paper on any climate topic.
If Winters, a paid denier, were seriously and honestly interested in understanding or debating climate science, he would be conducting research, publishing peer reviewed scientific articles, and debating climate scientists.
Instead, he is taking money to write denier blogs for gullible deniers who, despite the overwheloming preponderance of the global scientific community agreeing with the accepted consensus, think he is credible due to being a PhD in a non-climate field.

That's funny ... the exact same things can be said about you ... how much trainng [sic] do you have in "climate acience [sic]" that makes you such an expert at the overwheloming [sic] preponderance ... wait a minute ... do you know what the word "preponderance" means, because I think you're using it wrong ...

Why does the minute 100-parts-per-million (ppm) increase in CO2 have such an impact on warming?

This is a good question ... do you know the answer? ... and substitute 125 ppm if you want ... won't change the numbers much ...
 
Fair enough ... your opinion has no bearing on science ... glad you see that ... you don't need to know what 125 ppm CO2 does, you just repeat someone else's words ...
 
Fair enough ... your opinion has no bearing on science ... glad you see that ... you don't need to know what 125 ppm CO2 does, you just repeat someone else's words ...
I didnt say that. That was your non sequitur, tossed out in lieu of any cogent point.

But ultimately, yes, I will trust the overwhelmong consensusbof the global scientific community across every field of science before i would trust a paid denier with no experience with climate, or an uneducated slob starting threads on a political message board.

And you should do the same.
 
There you go again ... the very first point Dr Winters makes is "non-sequitur" in the discussion of what he said ... just because it doesn't fit the dogma you faithfully believe ... trusting paid Alarmists with no experience with climate ... that's a well thought out political opinion ... I'm sure you faithfully vote your fears and encourage others to do the same ...

Creating a toxic environment for discussion means you know you're wrong ... and can't bear honest dialogue in the matter ...
 
Termite and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Facts: Scientists have calculated that termites alone produce ten times as much carbon dioxide as all the fossil fuels burned in the whole world in a year. Pound for pound, the weight of all the termites in the world is greater than the total weight of humans.


Methane Sources - Termites
Each termite produces, on average, about half a microgram of methane per day, a seemingly insignificant amount. However, when this is multiplied up by the world population of termites, global methane emission from this source is estimated to be about 20 million tonnes each year.
 
2019 is shaping up to be the second hottest year ever recorded...
The key word there is "recorded". Do you know what happens if you move the date back from 1880 to say 1850?
Why stop there? Move it back 4 billion years, when the earth was covered with molten rock.

Just make your point.
If you move it back 30 years the warming goes away.

Do you not ever wonder why they always insist on starting at the year 1880?
 
Having problems with empirical evidence and facts again?
No jackass, i am on the right side of facts, history, and science. You are part of a tiny cadre of denier morons that only exists in the republican party of the united states.

Glad that's settled...

You keep making that claim...but don't seem to be able to provide any evidence to support them....you claim that you are on the side of science, but never offer up any of this science that you claim to be on the side of...as far as history goes...that is a loser since science has been wrong far more often than they have been right.....

In short, by your own admission, your position is based on your politics...and nothing else...
 
2019 is shaping up to be the second hottest year ever recorded...

Acording to the heavily massaged, manipulated, homogenized record...the same record, by the way, that alarmist have used to claim that every where is warming at twice the rate of everywhere else...how stupid does one have to be in order to believe that sort of propaganda..
D4XMRVvXoAEvpjs.jpg
 
2019 is shaping up to be the second hottest year ever recorded...
The key word there is "recorded". Do you know what happens if you move the date back from 1880 to say 1850?
Why stop there? Move it back 4 billion years, when the earth was covered with molten rock.

Just make your point.

Do you think that you might have a different impression of the present temperature were the starting point not the coolest in the past 150 years? You don't think starting at the coolest period in the past 150 years, rather than a warmer point might serve to advance a particular narrative?....or are you naive enough to think that choosing the coolest year of the past 150 years was a coincidence?
 
Do you not ever wonder why they always insist on starting at the year 1880?

People like him never "wonder" about anything...they accept whatever propaganda they are given by people that they choose based on their particular politics...
 
If you move it back 30 years the warming goes away.

False. And that's a stupid point anyway. We know why the earth has rapidly warmed for the last 100 years. Your parlor tricks are meaningless.
Really? Let’s see some actual observed measured evidence that supports your claim that “we know”... You cultists are always talking about the “consensus” bud don’t seem to be able to provide any of this mythical science upon which the consensus is based.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top