Clear Cut Evidence Laid Out From Jack Smith Transcripts: Trump Is Going To Prison, And So Are His Accomplices

[ThisIsMe]

Because you don't know anything about the law. That's not a very good reason.

I know I know, nothing to see here..don’t even look!

I believe there is only a very limited scenario where it’s ok for a judge to release pre trial evidence. This is why it needs to be looked into.

Had this been a “Trump judge”, you’d all already have her convicted in your minds.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Dream on.

I know, it’s a pipe dream to think dems would ever be held accountable for anything

 

[Nostra]

That's right. Smith DOES have him. That's why douche nozzle Trump & his asseater's like you are soiling yourselves daily as Smith breathes down Dotard's criminal neck.

Seek help soon.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A reply from a moron that knows not a damn thing and he will prove it in his response to me.

You didn't read the material. You stopped by to shit on the topic.

You can leave. We wouldn't want to bother you with the substance.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I know I know, nothing to see here..don’t even look!

Correct. Your gut feeling, brought about by loyalty to a criminal, is not basis for a formal investigation.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Correct. Your gut feeling, brought about by loyalty to a criminal, is not basis for a formal investigation.

You turn your head when someone on your side abuses their power to influence an election and you want to talk about loyalty to a criminal.

Oh, and for the 90th time (sarcasm…just in case), I have no loyalty to Trump, I only have a dislike for the fact that lefty’s love their lawfare.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You turn your head when someone on your side abuses their power to influence an election and you want to talk about loyalty to a criminal.

This isn't abuse of power, so this whiny talking point is worthless and nothing but a person who has run out of ad hoc talking points Scrambling to have anything to say.

 

[ThisIsMe]

This isn't abuse of power, so this whiny talking point is worthless and nothing but a person who has run out of ad hoc talking points Scrambling to have anything to say.

I think you’re wrong. I see it as election interference and abusing her power. That you disagree is fine. Well just have to disagree then

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I think you’re wrong. I see it as election interference and abusing her power. That you disagree is fine. Well just have to disagree then

It's doesn't matter what you see it as.
The rules are objective. You could call it Fred or call it murder. Makes no difference.

I'm trying to help you come to terms with this.

 

[ThisIsMe]

It's doesn't matter what you see it as.
The rules are objective. You could call it Fred or call it murder. Makes no difference.

I'm trying to help you come to terms with this.

And it doesn’t matter what you see it as either. Your opinion is no more valid than mine.

 

[daveman]

Correct. Your gut feeling, brought about by loyalty to a criminal, is not basis for a formal investigation.

ORANGE MAN BAD is not a crime.

 

[daveman]

And it doesn’t matter what you see it as either. Your opinion is no more valid than mine.

Oh, shit, now you've gone and pissed Indy off. He believes his opinion is the mostest valid opinion that ever was.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And it doesn’t matter what you see it as either. Your opinion is no more valid than mine.

Correct!

So I act like a normal adult and defer to the objective rules.

How many pages have you wasted, running headfirst into the same brick wall repeatedly? I'm now in a deep sleep.

 

[BackAgain]

Jack Smith’s papers provide exactly zero “evidence.”

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Jack Smith’s papers provide exactly zero “evidence.”

Right, they describe evidence.

Like written plans.

 

[BackAgain]

Right, they describe evidence.

Like written plans.

Wrong again, Farty.

They describe alleged evidence. Like any other mere claim which is subject to being actually proved.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They describe alleged evidence.

Haha, no, it will be entered in as "evidence".
Written plans are pretty compelling evidence, BTW.

 

[BackAgain]

Haha, no, it will be entered in as "evidence".
Written plans are pretty compelling evidence, BTW.

You — as usual — presume far too much.

The “case” may not even proceed to trial, at all.

And despite your ignorance, it simply isn’t true that a persecutor (or even a legitimate prosecutor) can simply wish an item into evidence.

Nice try. (Not really.) Try again.

 

[daveman]

Haha, no, it will be entered in as "evidence".
Written plans are pretty compelling evidence, BTW.

Handle them carefully. The ink's still wet.

 

[Oddball]