Clear Cut Evidence Laid Out From Jack Smith Transcripts: Trump Is Going To Prison, And So Are His Accomplices

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It doesn’t require much argument,

It does if you aim to convince anyone but yourself that Aileen freaking Cannon outsmarted 50+ years of precedent and jurisprudence.

As of now, you're just some guy sitting there saying one judge was right, and 5 judges were wrong. And you can't say why.

Surely you can see how that is not.compelling. And how a normal.person would kind of see it the other way... that the twice overturned judge with the anomalous decision is wrong, not right.

 

[justoffal]

That's right. Smith DOES have him. That's why douche nozzle Trump & his asseater's like you are soiling yourselves daily as Smith breathes down Dotard's criminal neck.

YAWWWWN..... I don't know.,.
Smith might be the one going to prison.

He's crossed enough lines and broken enough rules to be charged with criminal behavior.

 

[justoffal]

Maybe the same one.

A whole draw full of socks

 

[WEATHER53]

Zealots are about as bad as it gets
They lose all sense of proportional reality

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He's crossed enough lines and broken enough rules to be charged with criminal behavior.

Go ahead and name 3.

See you in never.

You've really been guzzling the koolaid lately, pal.

 

[BackAgain]

It does if you aim to convince anyone but yourself that Aileen freaking Cannon outsmarted 50+ years of precedent and jurisprudence.

I never expect to persuade completely ignorant irrational lumps of stupid like you.

As of now, you're just some guy sitting there saying one judge was right, and 5 judges were wrong. And you can't say why.

And you’re there claiming that a few judges got it right when the one who did get it right somehow didn’t.

You are laughably stupid. Always.

Surely you can see how that is not.compelling. And how a normal.person would kind of see it the other way... that the twice overturned judge with the anomalous decision is wrong, not right.

Not compelling? As if anything you’ve spurted amounts to even marginally persuasive.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And you’re there claiming that a few judges got it right when the one who did get it right somehow didn’t.

Only in response to your completely unevidenced and unargued claim otherwise.

So you are now chastising me for behavior that was imitation of you. My demonstration that your ad hoc claims can be dismissed as easily as they are made.

Which is funny.

My opinion is that of an idiot observer, which you and i are. And one anomalous decision -- at odds with all others including one decison since hers --from a dubious judge who has already been embarrassed and overturned twice un the same case...

...is not going to win the day. Seems like a safe bet to me.

 

[BackAgain]

Only in response to your completely unevidenced and unargued claim otherwise.

So you are now chastising me for behavior that was imitation of you. My demonstration that your ad hoc claims can be dismissed as easily as they are made.

Which is funny.

My opinion is that of an idiot observer, which you and i are. And one anomalous decision -- at odds with all others including one decison since hers --from a dubious judge who has already been embarrassed and overturned twice un the same case...

...is not going to win the day. Seems like a safe bet to me.

Says Farty while ignoring my previous post ( Clear Cut Evidence Laid Out From Jack Smith Transcripts: Trump Is Going To Prison, And So Are His Accomplices ) which starts to dismember his ignorant views about Judge Cannon’s decision.

Just too tough for you, Farty. Understood.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Says Farty while ignoring my previous post ( Clear Cut Evidence Laid Out From Jack Smith Transcripts: Trump Is Going To Prison, And So Are His Accomplices ) which starts to dismember his ignorant views about Judge Cannon’s decision.

Just too tough for you, Farty. Understood.

You didn't make any argument for why she is correct. Sorry.

You simply repeated her anomalous decision.

So I could just throw 5 back at you that say otherwise.

You're really not getting this.

 

[BackAgain]

You didn't make any argument for why she is correct. Sorry.

I just knew you wouldn’t get it despite being laid out plainly and clearly. Seriously, Farts. Youre way too dumb.

You simply repeated her anomalous decision.

I see you don’t know what words actually mean.

So I could just throw 5 back at you that say otherwise.

You're really not getting this.

Tragic how retarded you are. Really. I pity you. Most people do. Once they get to know the really dumbass you under your suit of imperviousness.

 

[Shareprofit]

YAWWWWN..... I don't know.,.
Smith might be the one going to prison.

He's crossed enough lines and broken enough rules to be charged with criminal behavior.

What are these lines Smith has crossed. Is this another 2020 election fraud type MAGA bullshit or for real.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I just knew you wouldn’t get it despite being laid out plainly and clearly. Seriously, Farts. Youre way too dumb.

I see you don’t know what words actually mean.



Tragic how retarded you are. Really. I pity you. Most people do. Once they get to know the really dumbass you under your suit of imperviousness.

You copy pasted her argument and said it is correct.


Mere repetition of the same claim.

Repetition of a claim is not support for the truth of the claim.

 

[BackAgain]

You copy pasted her argument and said it is correct.

Your abysmal ignorance is showing. I don’t even allude to her ruling. Instead, you petty twit, I just boiled down the meaning of the Cinsritution under the facts and circumstances of the Smith “appointment.”

And you can’t even address it.

Mere repetition of the same claim.

False, as usual from you.

Repetition of a claim is not support for the truth of the claim.

Good. Since it wasn’t repetition. And you can’t touch the logic in any way.

Your ongoing fail is massive and it’s funny.

You really don’t know a thing about this topic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Good. Since it wasn’t repetition. And you can’t touch the logic in any way.

I don't have to. I know just as much about it as you: nothing. I am just not as happy and eager to show this off as you are.

I am betting, as an observer, the anomalous, twice overturned judge gets overruled again. For the solid reasons mentioned.

It's a safe bet.

 

[BackAgain]

I don't have to. I know just as much about it as you: nothing. I am just not as happy and eager to show this off as you are.

Unlike you, I read and understood her decision. I also read the Constitution and I also know that his “appointment” doesn’t comply with Art. II, Sec. 2, cl. 2.

So I agree that You know nothing.

I am betting, as an observer, the anomalous, twice overturned judge gets overruled again. For the solid reasons mentioned.

You really see yourself as a word smith. You’re actually not. And she will have her decision affirmed in the end. For the actual reasons I specified.

It's a safe bet.

LOL.

You’re a loser.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

He's done, and he knows it. It's now a matter of when, not if.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

x.com

x.com

Aaahhhh the classics.