Clear Cut Evidence Laid Out From Jack Smith Transcripts: Trump Is Going To Prison, And So Are His Accomplices

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She doesn’t get to make that choice.

False. She of course does, as it is her court and she violated no principles of jurisprudence.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Thanks for the humor this board needs it.

^^ formed a predictable opinion without reading any of the material

 

[Arlette]

Wow, this is a crazy Dem fantasy.

This is what's coming for Trump if he loses the election.

 

[lennypartiv]

This is what's coming for Trump if he loses the election.

How much are you going to contribute to the voter fraud?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Don't feed the Russian trolls...

 

[ThisIsMe]

On first blush, I could be persuaded that that is an outcome that could serve America.
Imprisoning one of our former Presidents....even if unanimously proven guilty....throws shade on America and our 'beacon-to- the-world' democracy also. Not just Don Trump.

So, declaring him to be mentally incompetent solves a PR challenge for America and yet, puts only him in the shade. Deeply in the shade.

Let him go off to Mar-a-Lago where he can pretend to his staff and family that he is as great as he says he is.
We could be cool with that scenario.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Clue for the cluefull: Read her opinion on why she released them.
She was in the same pickle James Comey found himself in with Clinton. Reveal it, don't reveal it. Either way you open yourself to partisan charges of interference.

So, I give props to this judge. She knew one side or the other would be skeptical...so she chose the right-of-the-people to know......as they would with any other defendant in similar proceedings.
Good on her.
Good for America.
------------------------------------------------

You know, poster DGS, you've been repeatedly shrilling that same charge on this venue for some time. You have been politely, then pointedly, asked to prove your allegation by several posters here.
You don't. You never do.
What's up with that?

You are coming across.....and no disrespect intended......like the loudmouth at the end of the bar that all the other patrons move away from.

Are you just an empty suit? Do you want others snickering at you? Pointing at you?

Be better.
We believe you could be.

She was in the same pickle James Comey found himself in with Clinton. Reveal it, don't reveal it. Either way you open yourself to partisan charges of interference

She’s a judge. Her job is to do what the law says. Her not releasing it is not election interference because it’s not her job to do anything one way or the other. She presides over court cases, not attempt to influence elections.

 

[Arlette]

How much are you going to contribute to the voter fraud?

You can't deal with the subject of Trump's criminality. It's causing you emotional discomfort. You are weak.

 

[ThisIsMe]

She already did. She released it.

I know, and she needs to be investigated for election interference.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I know, and she needs to be investigated for election interference.

Which will never happen, ever, no matter how much Trump.programs his cult to think otherwise.

 

[ThisIsMe]

False. She of course does, as it is her court and she violated no principles of jurisprudence.

I won’t argue the legality of what she did, while I believe she may have violated the, from my reading of when a judge can release pre trial information, but, I don’t know how all that works, so I won’t argue that

However, I personally think she needs to be investigated to make sure she didn’t run afoul of the law, didn’t violate election interference laws.

I think she certainly was unethical, and she did just blow this case up. You won’t be able to select a jury after this because she just tainted any future jury pool.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Which will never happen, ever, no matter how much Trump.programs his cult to think otherwise.

lol, we know, because being a democrat pays…

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

However, I personally think she needs to be investigated to make sure she didn’t run afoul of the law, didn’t violate election interference laws.

Because you don't know anything about the law. That's not a very good reason.

 

[daveman]

The Democrat idea of the law is laughable. "ANYTHING THAT REINFORCES ORANGE MAN BAD IS LEGAL".

All y'all a bunch of idiots.

 

[Arlette]

I know, and she needs to be investigated for election interference.

Dream on.

 

[Arlette]

The Democrat idea of the law is laughable. "ANYTHING THAT REINFORCES ORANGE MAN BAD IS LEGAL".

All y'all a bunch of idiots.

The transcript shows criminal intent by Trump.

 

[daveman]

The transcript shows criminal intent by Trump.

To people who have already made up their minds based on irrational hatred. That's not the win you believe it is.

 

[Arlette]

To people who have already made up their minds based on irrational hatred. That's not the win you believe it is.

This ain't TikTok. There is evidence, and Smith has it.

 

[daveman]

This ain't TikTok. There is evidence, and Smith has it.

He's running out of time. Probably because he has to make some more up.

 

[Papageorgio]

^^ formed a predictable opinion without reading any of the material

A reply from a moron that knows not a damn thing and he will prove it in his response to me.

 

[Man With A Plan]

The transcript shows criminal intent by Trump.

Are you not noticing that as time goes by...each of the "lawfare" suits brought against Trump are getting savaged in appeals courts? It might take some time but our legal system does eventually work.