Clear Cut Evidence Laid Out From Jack Smith Transcripts: Trump Is Going To Prison, And So Are His Accomplices

Correct! Your entire argument is that one judge followed the law.

So I guess I win 5 to 1.

Ouch.
Wrong again. My argument is that it’s not a numbers game. If she correctly rules in the law and some others did not, she isn’t outvoted, you twit.

Unlike you, she was correct.
 
More cheating before Election Day equals more cheating ON Election Day
 
My argument is that it’s not a numbers game.
No, your only "argument" (a claim, actually) was that her ruling was in accordance with law.

And the rebuttal is that 100% of the other judges who ruled did so in accordance with the law.

So you have made no progress.
 
Smith writes epistles to himself and feels it’s meaningful in his insane zealot pursuit of Trump
He sounds like an unhinged little despot on his Twitter feed. Completely biased and dishonest
 
Ha ha. You always fold like a cheap suit. What a total sissy.
I did make a comment directly to you so a response is fine
Otherwise constant responses to ANY post I make at a 95% response rate is Stalking because I Say So. Just like impermissible family attacks or sex threat, judgement is in the eye of the recipient
You are very childish and very ill and display that constantly.
 
15th post
I did make a comment directly to you so a response is fine
Otherwise constant responses to ANY post I make at a 95% response rate is Stalking because I Say So. Just like impermissible family attacks or sex threat, judgement is in the eye of the recipient
You are very childish and very ill and display that constantly.
This is a public forum. If you wanna have a sweetheart style conversation, then slide over to DMs and stop your embarrassing whining.
 
*by following the objective rules

That sure is a clear and direct comment on your party.

Thanks for the accidental moment of honesty.

Really? You have to add your own commentary to my comment to spin your point.

You’re just being a partisan, nothing more.

Again, we all know where this conversation would be going if this were a right wing judge. If Hur had released his interview with Biden Biden, you all would have been apoplectic.

You all defended Biden despite the investigation confirming that he DID commit crimes, but because he was an elderly, well meaning old man with a poor memory, it was no big deal
 
Last edited:
No, your only "argument" (a claim, actually) was that her ruling was in accordance with law.

Yes. It was. And I supported it more than you support your claim.
And the rebuttal is that 100% of the other judges who ruled did so in accordance with the law.

That’s not a rebuttal. Even judges can disagree. And thus the “argument” to offer is just a fallacy.
So you have made no progress.
So, as always, you’re stuck on retarded.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom