Clarence Thomas attacks Brown v. Board ruling amid 70th anniversary

It is worth mentioning that the Constitutional basis of Brown v Board was very questionable. The Feds and the Court have no such power under the Constitution.

More important, the case has been a total failure. The belief that "inspired" the ruling was that "separate but equal" was allowing states and school districts to shortchange Negros, thus providing a less "equal" education than it provided to White kids. By demanding that schools be integrated, it was thought that Negro children would get a better education than they had been.

But this was a fatuous hope that has not proven itself valid in the ensuing seventy years. Schools were integrated, often by force, and yet the academic "achievement gap" remains, and it appears that Black parents would just as soon have their kids educated with other Black kids, if given the choice. Further, the White schools that had an influx of Black students suffered academically, with the only benefit being better basketball teams.

The VP's implicit claims that her education was enhanced significantly by being bused to a "Whiter" school are nothing but empty posturing. Having two highly-educated parents did her more good than any public school would have, regardless of its demographic profile.

Thank God we have justices like Justice Thomas, who knows the Constitution and knows how it is supposed to apply to American lives.
Same as Forcing Sports to Include Those Who Didn't Make the Cut

A wedge was inserted with "separate but equal." Foolish for the South to express segration that way.

Why should they have been equal?
The races aren't genetically equal in intelligence; school is for the intelligent only, except for dumbed-down basics, which would slow down the development of White kids.
 
That is NOT from the Constitution.

That is the very OPINION we are discussing.

Show me FROM THE WORDS OF THE CONSTITUTION where separate but equal is unconstitutional.
Whoever Writes a Scheme Behind Closed Doors Should Be Locked Away

Why should we care either way? Under the ruling class's self-serving Constitution, we, the people, are separated from legislating because the Founding Fodder called us "a mob."
 
His opinion is not sane.
Do you believe Jim Crow schools were funded the same as white schools? You believe it is acceptable to be forced to go to one school because you are black, Asian, Hispanic, and another for white? You believe that's Constitutional?
Thought Control Includes Not Believing It Exists

Why should we believe in the Constitution when only massive one-sided brainwashing produces that slavish obedience to it?
 
Same as Forcing Sports to Include Those Who Didn't Make the Cut

A wedge was inserted with "separate but equal." Foolish for the South to express segration that way.

Why should they have been equal?
The races aren't genetically equal in intelligence; school is for the intelligent only, except for dumbed-down basics, which would slow down the development of White kids.
You're a pathetic, racist fool. :fu:
 
Same as Forcing Sports to Include Those Who Didn't Make the Cut

A wedge was inserted with "separate but equal." Foolish for the South to express segration that way.

Why should they have been equal?
The races aren't genetically equal in intelligence; school is for the intelligent only, except for dumbed-down basics, which would slow down the development of White kids.
You're obsessed with sports almost as much as you're intimidated by education and scared of people who don't look like you. It seems highly likely that you tried some sport one time and failed so spectacularly that the humiliation has traumatized you to this day.
 
They aren't equal.

Interesting. I have never seen anyone actually try to defend separate but equal before.
Frankly, “separate but equal” was always a fraud. I am very satisfied with that canard getting jettisoned by the SCOTUS.

That does not mean, nevertheless, that Justice Thomas is necessarily “wrong” in criticizing how they made that ruling. It is a fair criticism even when we may approve of the outcome.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom