This is as crazy as the Seattle preacher who is also a practicing
Muslim:
Shortly after noon on Fridays, the Rev. Ann Holmes Redding ties on a black headscarf, preparing to pray with her Muslim group on First Hill.
On Sunday mornings, Redding puts on the white collar of an Episcopal priest.
She does both, she says, because she's Christian and Muslim.
Crazy people congregating together is fine, but playacting that they're actually a part of a religion is where it gets crazy for everyone else, those who aren't crazy. Religions are about the faithful believing in a common thing. It's really stretching the limits of credulity to argue that the common tie holding these people together is they believe everyone is correct. The person who hates the devil is in the same church as the person who loves the devil and they're both right. Only a freaking liberal could see sense in that.
The Unitarians that I know never judge who is "correct", and who is not. It is all about mutual respect of our fellow human beings. That would include those that your church shuns as unworthy of being in your congregation.
Look, there are a lot of loons in the ranks of liberals. This non-judgmentalism is a manifestation of this. If I KNOW something to be TRUE, then I'd have to be off my rocker to claim that it's false. If I KNOW that the gun you're holding to your head is loaded and you claim it isn't, we both can't be correct. One of us is right and the other is wrong. If I know that I'm right then I have a duty to be JUDGMENTAL and to stop your from pulling the trigger.
The same applies with religion. People believe in religion because they believe it to be true. If I'm on the right road and you're not following me, then it follows that you're on the wrong road.
Non-judgmentalism is simply an unwillingness to defend one's own beliefs. This is so weak tea that it's barely above having no beliefs or standards at all.
"Is incest wrong?"
"Well, it's wrong for me but I certainly don't want to judge you."
That's just a cowards way. From what you've said about your and your wife's reactions about the Catholic Church having standards and applying them and how this upset you, I can see why you'd like these Unitarians. You guys have really bought into this non-judgmentalism philosophy. This is like an intellectual cancer infecting society. Having no standards is better than, and more polite than, having a standard and advocating or defending the standard.
"Can you be a Christians preacher and a Muslim at the same time?"
"Hey, if it works for you, who am I to judge."
"Dude, the beliefs are mutually contradictory - you can't be both."
"Yeah, but I don't want to appear judgmental because in my religion, liberalism, it's s mark of shame to express judgment on anything because that makes you look narrow minded and for those of us in the religion of liberalism, our self-image is the most important thing to us."