- Jan 24, 2015
- Reaction score
- Alta California, federalist.
Only if you consider a fallacy of false cause to be the equivalent.Right of refusal exists , no shoes, no shirt no service. Precedent is set it’s not discriminationRights to what? Are you saying there is a "right to be served equally"? Or even a "right" to be served at all? If that's the case, our "rights" are violated every day, by nearly every business. Such a concept is absurd, and can't be enforced without violating a slew of actual individual rights.and our constitution states every person has rights. Her rights are at subject here. no one else's.So is it just an issues of how it handled. The court also suggest tolerance on both sides.
Still the court comment about undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs is vague.
Still the bible does teach tolerance and to respect everyone.
Well are you saying that same sex marriage couples are not citizens and have no rights? They also have rights.
Public accommodation laws. It is that simple.