- Jan 24, 2015
- Reaction score
- Alta California, federalist.
The seller is not forced to operate on a for-profit basis instead of a for-morals basis in public accommodation. Operating in public accommodation is not a right, it is a privilege, and that privilege is contingent upon following the laws established for public accommodation which that seller agreed to do in order to operate in public accommodation. Why is the seller bearing false witness to that public act when the seller originally applied for a license or permit to operate in public accommodation?The Buyer IS NOT FORCED to use that business!
Where are you getting this?
And, the buyer also has a First Amendment which any seller must also respect in public accommodation.
§2000a (a)All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin. 42 U.S.C.