Chris Wallace - Saying for Trump to condemn white supremacists was proof of his shill, Democrat partisanship

[Dr Grump]

Biden refuses to condemn Antifa, in fact, he does not even believe it exists.

The Proud Boys have a national president and membership.

Who runs Antifa again?

So, one group is more traditionally structured and the other is more of a cell organization.


Wow. Different groups with different structures. What a radical concept.


You must feel brilliant coming to that realization.

Ok. So who are the leaders? The drivers of Antifa?

 

[BrokeLoser]

It takes a very deplorable mindset to see a question about condemning white supremacy as a “trap”.

That said, do you think Biden would have the nuts to condemn black criminality?
The funny thing is; the same could be said about so many things that Leftists champion.

Watch this...
It takes a very deplorable mindset to see a question about condemning white supremacy illegal wetbacks as a “trap”.

 

[BlueGin]

condoning, antifa? Constantly conflating BLM and riots, or protests.

You just now said you understood the difference and at the same time claimed that somehow Pelosi is responsible for them because the majority will vote for Biden.

Biden has unequivocally condemned violence at protests. Trump said "stand down and stand by".

LOL All the violence is from Antifa and BLM.

Biden and his campaign accused Kyle Rittenhouse of being a 'white supremacist' and have been served notice to retract by L. Lin Wood. Lawsuits against Biden and his campaign to follow.

Attorney for Kyle Rittenhouse demands Biden retract white supremacist ad featuring client

An attorney for Kyle Rittenhouse demanded a retraction from Joe Biden after the 17-year-old appeared to be featured in an advertisement about white supremacy. L. Lin Wood, who is Rittenhouse’s defamation attorney, warned Biden that a video he posted on Wednesday featuring President Trump’s...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

I saw that. I hope they follow through.

 

[Dale Smith]

From the lil Mamooth, October of 2016. I thought it appropriate to shove this down his throat being the pussbag that he is....

Yes, yes, you've been my pout-stalker for many years. Everyone understands that.

And they know why. The weepiest of Trump's pajama-boi beta bitches are starting to regret getting castrated as part of the Trump cult initiation ceremony. So they follow me around, hoping some of the alpha will rub off on them.

The same thing goes this year. Are you going to run after Trump's humilating loss, or will you stick around to take your lumps? After all, all of the liberals stuck around. But then, the liberals possessed gonads. I can't imagine any of Trump's weeping eunuchs here sticking around.

Mamu, you are just another leftard douchebag that offers zero in meaningful debate or dialogue. God knows that I have kicked your ass from one end of this forum to the other. You? "an alpha"????? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! You are the furthest thing from being an "alpha male". No leftard here has done as much bitching and moaning about Trump's win than you have. You and the leftards that didn't bail after the Hildebeast lost (that talked so much shit) have refused to accept Trump's victory....but here you are... wanting to know if those that supported Trump will accept a Biden victory. You are wanting what you and your fellow leftards refused to do.

As I recall, those that were unabashed supporters of Trump were more than gracious in victory. I couldn't claim to be apart of their celebration because I don't participate in the election process of this banana republic. I and many others that are far more informed than you and your ilk have been validated about the fact that there is indeed a shadow "gubermint" and a deep state that does their bidding with a compliant media.

Biden is a joke of a candidate and it will only be by voter fraud if he wins. The man is an even worse candidate than the Hildebeast. I am not going anywhere. I will take great delight in pointing out what a fraud Biden is should this shyster be cheated into office....good times!

Any other questions, Mamu????

(snicker)

What, and you're an alpha??? RATFLMAO....you're not even a Beta...

Trump supporters are gracious, like Dumbo the elephant is great at ballet.

I saw very few posts of Trump supporters rubbing the noses of leftards in the dirt after the election though they certainly deserved to do so....leftards were trying to do it pre-election, Gumbo......and afterwards cried like little bitches.

P.S I am more of a man than you could ever hope to be.

(snicker)

You were a member of this board during the last election. I call you a liar....

Well, depends on your definition of a man. If Trumplethinskin is your idea of a man, then indeed you are more of a man than I could ever hope to be.

Your purse-swinging means nothing to me. You little commie fucks are going to learn the hard way and it's because you lack the stomach for the fight. I would rather fight for my liberties and to exist on this planet than be subservient to a one world "gubermint" of elites that have have used those of your ilk like a crack whore.
You are totally clueless, punkinpuss.

 

[BlueGin]

That is just a pure gotcha question. Trump's choices are:

- No, he won't condemn white supremacists

- It had to be asked, you finally condemned them

It's called a loaded question. There is nothing but a lose in the answer. That Chris Wallace would ask a loaded question like that shows he had no place moderating a debate. And of course there were no such loaded questions for Joe Dementia Biden.

Then again anyone who has seen him on Fox already knows he's a DNC stooge



It's also a lie, Trump does condemn them in his answer. He just recognized it for the trap it was and tried not to give Chris the loaded answer he wanted.

Watch Biden, "so do it." Biden saw just like Trump did that it was a trap and was trying to push him in

It wasn’t proof of anything. He asked a similar question of Biden regarding the rioters in certain cities.

I do find it strange that the Deplorables talk about the manliness of Trump (even though he is far from being so), then whine like little pigs over how poor widdle Trumpie Wumpie was bullied on air...

I find it strange how you argue like a woman with baby talk. While disparaging someone’s manliness.

The Proud Boys are not supremacists. ANTIFA is though.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I like in an upscale Republican-voting gated community. There's not a single Trump sign around here. He's losing ground amongst this group.

Sounds like a bunch of neocon RINOs, lol.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Biden saw just like Trump did that it was a trap and was trying to push him in

Agreed. Most "questions" liberals ask are really attacks. The proper response, more and more, is to slap the lib in the face.

If Trump slapped little Chrissy, the dwarf would have fled the stage crying, and Trump is too good hearted to do that.

 

[Dr Grump]

Your purse-swinging means nothing to me. You little commie fucks are going to learn the hard way and it's because you lack the stomach for the fight. I would rather fight for my liberties and to exist on this planet than be subservient to a one world "gubermint" of elites that have have used those of your ilk like a crack whore.
You are totally clueless, punkinpuss.

Fight what? You? I have no interest in fighting you unless you tread on me.

If you voted for Trump, or believe in Trump, you have no right calling anybody clueless.

Antifa sound like they're conservatives.
"According to Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at the California State University, San Bernadino, antifa activists feel the need to participate in violent actions because "they believe that elites are controlling the government and the media. So they need to make a statement head-on against the people who they regard as racist".

Antifa (United States) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Dr Grump]

I find it strange how you argue like a woman with baby talk. While disparaging someone’s manliness.

The Proud Boys are not supremacists. ANTIFA is though.

No you don't. Find it strange that is. You're just trying to score a meaningless point.
Dunno what the proud boys are. Just sound like another bunch of shit stirrers wanting attention from the public.

 

[Dr Grump]

If Trump slapped little Chrissy, the dwarf would have fled the stage crying, and Trump is too good hearted to do that.

Yeah, that would be about Trump's level. Picking on somebody smaller.

 

[busybee01]

That is just a pure gotcha question. Trump's choices are:

- No, he won't condemn white supremacists

- It had to be asked, you finally condemned them

It's called a loaded question. There is nothing but a lose in the answer. That Chris Wallace would ask a loaded question like that shows he had no place moderating a debate. And of course there were no such loaded questions for Joe Dementia Biden.

Then again anyone who has seen him on Fox already knows he's a DNC stooge



It's also a lie, Trump does condemn them in his answer. He just recognized it for the trap it was and tried not to give Chris the loaded answer he wanted.

Watch Biden, "so do it." Biden saw just like Trump did that it was a trap and was trying to push him in

Wallace offered Trump a chance to condemn white supremacists. It was a softball question yet Trump muffed yet. The fact that the GOP is hiding under their desks when you ask them about it shows how bad it is.

 

[forkup]

And yet, you're a willing tool for Marxist black supremacists?

Just be open with what your code words mean.

You know,

Western chauvinist = White supremacist
Globalist = Jew
BLM = N-word

And so on. It's not like anyone doesn't know what you mean.

How does western chauvinist mean white supremacist? Don't tell me you're that stupid.

All things conservative or Republican mean "white supremacist" to the unhinged left. Like they say, "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every fucking thing looks like a nail to you."

Funny premise. So you understand that having an ideoligical leaning doesn't mean you have to agree with the extremes of that particular leaning?

Like for instance... I don't know... being against racial injustices not meaning you condone looting or violence during protests?

Or is that a distinction only for Republicans?

Of course I understand that. The problem however, is that the left doesn't seen to understand that. There are two sets of standards: One for the left, and one for the right.

While it's perfectly ok for them to constantly badger President Trump to dissociate himself with any group deemed "white supremacists", even though he has no direct or indirect ties to them, Democrats are never held to the same standard.

This was evident during last night's debate. At no time was presidential candidate Joe Biden asked to denounce, condemn, or criticize in any way, the violent actions of BLM, antifa. the Black Hebrew Israelites, radical leftist eco-terrorists, radical animal rights groups, radical anarchists, or other groups causing violence and unrest in this country.

Joe Biden when pressed about antifa, who are his constituency btw, merely claimed "It's an idea, not an organization." Even Democratic members of Congress have refused to condemn the violent people who ultimately support them

For instance, NY Rep. Jerry Nadler claiming that "Antifa violence in Portland id a myth." Or Democratic NM Rep. Deb Haaland describing Antifa as “peaceful protesters." Or MN Rep. Kieth Ellison, when he posed with a book promoting the violent antifa movement.

Even Nancy Pelosi has refused to condemn them, claiming "You’re not talking about the far left of the Democratic Party — they’re not even Democrats", even though the majority of them will be voting for Joe Biden.

And yet, you're a willing tool for Marxist black supremacists?

Just be open with what your code words mean.

You know,

Western chauvinist = White supremacist
Globalist = Jew
BLM = N-word

And so on. It's not like anyone doesn't know what you mean.

How does western chauvinist mean white supremacist? Don't tell me you're that stupid.

All things conservative or Republican mean "white supremacist" to the unhinged left. Like they say, "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every fucking thing looks like a nail to you."

Funny premise. So you understand that having an ideoligical leaning doesn't mean you have to agree with the extremes of that particular leaning?

Like for instance... I don't know... being against racial injustices not meaning you condone looting or violence during protests?

Or is that a distinction only for Republicans?

Of course I understand that. The problem however, is that the left doesn't seen to understand that. There are two sets of standards: One for the left, and one for the right.

While it's perfectly ok for them to constantly badger President Trump to dissociate himself with any group deemed "white supremacists", even though he has no direct or indirect ties to them, Democrats are never held to the same standard.

This was evident during last night's debate. At no time was presidential candidate Joe Biden asked to denounce, condemn, or criticize in any way, the violent actions of BLM, antifa. the Black Hebrew Israelites, radical leftist eco-terrorists, radical animal rights groups, radical anarchists, or other groups causing violence and unrest in this country.

Joe Biden when pressed about antifa, who are his constituency btw, merely claimed "It's an idea, not an organization." Even Democratic members of Congress have refused to condemn the violent people who ultimately support them

For instance, NY Rep. Jerry Nadler claiming that "Antifa violence in Portland id a myth." Or Democratic NM Rep. Deb Haaland describing Antifa as “peaceful protesters." Or MN Rep. Kieth Ellison, when he posed with a book promoting the violent antifa movement.

Even Nancy Pelosi has refused to condemn them, claiming "You’re not talking about the far left of the Democratic Party — they’re not even Democrats", even though the majority of them will be voting for Joe Biden.

First of all. You do realize that one of the main arguments against Biden is that he is supposedly condoning, antifa? Constantly conflating BLM and riots, or protests.

You just now said you understood the difference and at the same time claimed that somehow Pelosi is responsible for them because the majority will vote for Biden.

Biden has unequivocally condemned violence at protests. Trump said "stand down and stand by".

What Trump meant by "Stand down and stand by" was a slip on his part. What he meant by "stand by" was to not do anything. Of course the idiotic left who understands very little about trump, are probably interpreting that slip as "stand by for further orders" or some such bullshit.

They actually believe that Trump controls the right-wing element in this country, and they would willingly do his bidding. Of course, these are the same idiot left-wing/progressives/liberals/Democrats who after four years and a two-year long investigation, still believe the Trump paid Russian prostitutes to piss in a bed that Obama once slept in.

They still believe that President Trump is doing Putin's bidding, and that he "colluded" with Russia in order to cause Hillary to lose.

They still believe that he was talking directly to Putin when he said “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

They still believe that Trump won't release his taxes, because they will show how he was supposedly given money by Putin.

As for Joe Biden and his sentiment on antifa, nothing speaks louder then his own words. In a campaign video after the Charlottesville protest, he recounts how the "white supremacists" were "met by a courageous group of Americans and a violent clash ensued.” That "courageous group of Americans" was none other than antifa, which were the ones who originally started the violence.

It's right there at 1:01 in the video...

I read something the other day that seems apt. You guys always put out the same defence. "Trump didn't say it, if he did, you didn't understand, if you did, it's not important, if it is, we still don't care.

 

[Correll]

That is just a pure gotcha question. Trump's choices are:

- No, he won't condemn white supremacists

- It had to be asked, you finally condemned them

It's called a loaded question. There is nothing but a lose in the answer. That Chris Wallace would ask a loaded question like that shows he had no place moderating a debate. And of course there were no such loaded questions for Joe Dementia Biden.

Then again anyone who has seen him on Fox already knows he's a DNC stooge



It's also a lie, Trump does condemn them in his answer. He just recognized it for the trap it was and tried not to give Chris the loaded answer he wanted.

Watch Biden, "so do it." Biden saw just like Trump did that it was a trap and was trying to push him in

It wasn’t proof of anything. He asked a similar question of Biden regarding the rioters in certain cities.

I do find it strange that the Deplorables talk about the manliness of Trump (even though he is far from being so), then whine like little pigs over how poor widdle Trumpie Wumpie was bullied on air...

1. There is nothing wrong with discussing whether a leader is strong or "manly".

2. Traps can be laid for the strongest man. Indeed, the stronger the target the more motive to avoid a fair fight.

3. Your sentence is structured as though there is a conflict between those two ideas, but there isn't. Are you delusional or lying?

 

[Correll]

Biden refuses to condemn Antifa, in fact, he does not even believe it exists.

The Proud Boys have a national president and membership.

Who runs Antifa again?

So, one group is more traditionally structured and the other is more of a cell organization.


Wow. Different groups with different structures. What a radical concept.


You must feel brilliant coming to that realization.

Ok. So who are the leaders? The drivers of Antifa?

I don't know. They have not be made public. Almost as though they know they are a criminal and violent, even traitorous organization and thus have motive to hide.

 

[DBA]

One guy I work with is a full-throated Hispanic Trumpster!

My neighborhood has about 20+ Trump signs and not a single Biden sign.

Even the young hippy house down the block wont put out Biden signs, lol.

I like in an upscale Republican-voting gated community. There's not a single Trump sign around here. He's losing ground amongst this group.

Same here except he is definetely not losing ground in my area.

 

[DBA]

I already explained the lunacy you believe, right above your post.

And I was mocking that for being so transparently stupid, dishonest and delusional.

And we'll continue to point out Trump was calling for fascist brownshirts to commit violence, and Trump will lose votes, and you'll get triggered because you can't stop it, and life will be wonderful.

Trump didn’t call for violence. Biden said ANTIFA was an idea and that is ok. You guys are complete morons.

 

[Mac1958]

How the hell, in anybody's language, is "do you condemn white supremacy?" a loaded question? Are you serious?

Sure they're serious. It's a loaded question in TrumpWorld, for obvious reasons.

The question was just one thing, of course. The response was pretty mind-blowing, even for Trump, but they didn't see any problem with it. For obvious reasons.

You are a fucking moron. President Trump condemned white nationalists right after Charlottesville happened. Those people vote for Biden now.

Since then he has repeatedly condemned them.

Biden refuses to condemn Antifa, in fact, he does not even believe it exists.

Total moron. Trump 2020!

See?

 

[Mac1958]

They don't care that he has repeatedly condemned them. THe point is to use "Questions" to give credibility to the rest of their constant race baiting.

Those darn "questions"!

 

[Correll]

They don't care that he has repeatedly condemned them. THe point is to use "Questions" to give credibility to the rest of their constant race baiting.

Those darn "questions"!

Correct. "Questions" that are actually thinly veiled attacks are not questions.


That was my point. It was a clear point.

You expressed ridicule, but did not actually address my valid point.


That makes you the asshole here. Not me.

 

[Mac1958]

They don't care that he has repeatedly condemned them. THe point is to use "Questions" to give credibility to the rest of their constant race baiting.

Those darn "questions"!

Correct. "Questions" that are actually thinly veiled attacks are not questions.


That was my point. It was a clear point.

You expressed ridicule, but did not actually address my valid point.


That makes you the asshole here. Not me.

Of course. You're the victim. Again.