TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 38,256
- 50,319
- 2,915
The Chinese bought the Democrats about 25 years ago, remember Bill Clinton took bribes from them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Chinese bought the Democrats about 25 years ago, remember Bill Clinton took bribes from them.
We won the first Desert Storm to "liberate" Kuwait. Yes.1. we won PG1--''fast'''/with ''few casualtiesIf we're attacking Afghanistan as a whole, why get troops killed, why not just nuke the fucking sand pile? We don't know how to win a war any more.jesus christ!!So why not simply send in a Seal team? Sending in a whole didn't work at all. And the Talibans and the Afghan people had nothing to do with anything. And we supposedly caught Osama in Pakistan and never invaded them. What gives?hahahhahahahahhahahaThe hijackers were NEVER in Afghanistan, they were trained in the US. So in fact the Afghans had nothing to do with 9/11 and didn't deserve that we destroy their country.hahahahahaha-againMost of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. And invading Afghanistan to get Al-Qaeda makes as much sense as Invading Italy to get at the mafia.....Afghanistan is where the people lived----that murdered more Americans than at Pearl HarborMaybe if we stopped attacking countries, especially the ones that never did anything to us, like Iraq and Afghanistan. Lots of countries have been peaceful for almost ever, just the US that has been at war for nearly its whole existence...the world is usually NEVER at peace..there are always conflictS/wars/etc
..there NEVER has been world peace
...so we should just let them murder Americans???????!!!!!!!.. = idiocy
..that's like a cop letting a criminal go
.
so we go to SA while the terrorists are in Afghanistan!!!??--BRILLIANT
you people are amateurs --you lose with every post you make
..the brains/HQ/etc was in Afghanistan
you think they have only ONE group of terrorists with ONE person that commands/operates/sends orders/sends supplies/coordinates/etc etc??
..NO. these people aren't stupid ragheads eating and drinking in tents
2. we won in Korea---I've linked and proven this many times on USMB
stop!!!!!!!!!!! OBVIOUSLY you don't research/etc about wars
AND, again see post #47
Learn your history properly, that's not how it went.....yes it did--they violated the cease fire of PG1--the war for KuwaitThe first war for Kuwait had nothing to do with why we invaded Iraq. Shit man, crowdfund yourself a clue...the Iraqis attacked Kuwait!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!hahahahhahahaThe Germans attacked an ally of ours. The Afghans and the Iraqis didn't attack anyone.you prove to know nothing about wars/militaryThe hijackers were NEVER in Afghanistan, they were trained in the US. So in fact the Afghans had nothing to do with 9/11 and didn't deserve that we destroy their country.hahahahahaha-againMost of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. And invading Afghanistan to get Al-Qaeda makes as much sense as Invading Italy to get at the mafia.....Afghanistan is where the people lived----that murdered more Americans than at Pearl HarborMaybe if we stopped attacking countries, especially the ones that never did anything to us, like Iraq and Afghanistan. Lots of countries have been peaceful for almost ever, just the US that has been at war for nearly its whole existence...the world is usually NEVER at peace..there are always conflictS/wars/etc
..there NEVER has been world peace
...so we should just let them murder Americans???????!!!!!!!.. = idiocy
..that's like a cop letting a criminal go
.
so we go to SA while the terrorists are in Afghanistan!!!??--BRILLIANT
..the French were our Allies in WW2--yet we ''destroyed'' their towns/killed their people.....that's part of war
..again, like I said, it's the terrorists fault, not the US'...just like it was Germany's fault in WW2
2. doesn't matter..the bad guys are hiding in Afghanistan --DUH
AND, if Iraq had not invaded Kuwait, there would not have been a PG2
hahahhahahaha----you keep proving you've never researched or read the subjectWe won the first Desert Storm to "liberate" Kuwait. Yes.1. we won PG1--''fast'''/with ''few casualtiesIf we're attacking Afghanistan as a whole, why get troops killed, why not just nuke the fucking sand pile? We don't know how to win a war any more.jesus christ!!So why not simply send in a Seal team? Sending in a whole didn't work at all. And the Talibans and the Afghan people had nothing to do with anything. And we supposedly caught Osama in Pakistan and never invaded them. What gives?hahahhahahahahhahahaThe hijackers were NEVER in Afghanistan, they were trained in the US. So in fact the Afghans had nothing to do with 9/11 and didn't deserve that we destroy their country.hahahahahaha-againMost of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. And invading Afghanistan to get Al-Qaeda makes as much sense as Invading Italy to get at the mafia.....Afghanistan is where the people lived----that murdered more Americans than at Pearl HarborMaybe if we stopped attacking countries, especially the ones that never did anything to us, like Iraq and Afghanistan. Lots of countries have been peaceful for almost ever, just the US that has been at war for nearly its whole existence...the world is usually NEVER at peace..there are always conflictS/wars/etc
..there NEVER has been world peace
...so we should just let them murder Americans???????!!!!!!!.. = idiocy
..that's like a cop letting a criminal go
.
so we go to SA while the terrorists are in Afghanistan!!!??--BRILLIANT
you people are amateurs --you lose with every post you make
..the brains/HQ/etc was in Afghanistan
you think they have only ONE group of terrorists with ONE person that commands/operates/sends orders/sends supplies/coordinates/etc etc??
..NO. these people aren't stupid ragheads eating and drinking in tents
2. we won in Korea---I've linked and proven this many times on USMB
stop!!!!!!!!!!! OBVIOUSLY you don't research/etc about wars
AND, again see post #47
Korea at best was a stalemate.
We lost in Nam.
We tried to invade Canada twice and lost both times.
hold it?? you said ''we don't know how to win a war anymore'''We won the first Desert Storm to "liberate" Kuwait. Yes.1. we won PG1--''fast'''/with ''few casualtiesIf we're attacking Afghanistan as a whole, why get troops killed, why not just nuke the fucking sand pile? We don't know how to win a war any more.jesus christ!!So why not simply send in a Seal team? Sending in a whole didn't work at all. And the Talibans and the Afghan people had nothing to do with anything. And we supposedly caught Osama in Pakistan and never invaded them. What gives?hahahhahahahahhahahaThe hijackers were NEVER in Afghanistan, they were trained in the US. So in fact the Afghans had nothing to do with 9/11 and didn't deserve that we destroy their country.hahahahahaha-againMost of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia. And invading Afghanistan to get Al-Qaeda makes as much sense as Invading Italy to get at the mafia.....Afghanistan is where the people lived----that murdered more Americans than at Pearl HarborMaybe if we stopped attacking countries, especially the ones that never did anything to us, like Iraq and Afghanistan. Lots of countries have been peaceful for almost ever, just the US that has been at war for nearly its whole existence...the world is usually NEVER at peace..there are always conflictS/wars/etc
..there NEVER has been world peace
...so we should just let them murder Americans???????!!!!!!!.. = idiocy
..that's like a cop letting a criminal go
.
so we go to SA while the terrorists are in Afghanistan!!!??--BRILLIANT
you people are amateurs --you lose with every post you make
..the brains/HQ/etc was in Afghanistan
you think they have only ONE group of terrorists with ONE person that commands/operates/sends orders/sends supplies/coordinates/etc etc??
..NO. these people aren't stupid ragheads eating and drinking in tents
2. we won in Korea---I've linked and proven this many times on USMB
stop!!!!!!!!!!! OBVIOUSLY you don't research/etc about wars
AND, again see post #47
Korea at best was a stalemate.
We lost in Nam.
We tried to invade Canada twice and lost both times.
The Chinese are not saying anything new that most haven't said before...we know you hate AmericaThey sound correct.
1. a poll --hahahhahahahThe Chinese are not saying anything new that most haven't said before...we know you hate AmericaThey sound correct.
It has happened again: yet another international poll finds that the U.S. is viewed by peoples around the world to be the biggest threat to world peace.But, to start, let’s summarize the first-ever poll that had been done on this, back in 2013, which was the only prior poll on this entire issue, and it was the best-performed such poll: “An end-of-the-year WIN/Gallup International survey found that people in 65 countries believe the United States is the greatest threat to world peace”, as the N.Y. Post reported on 5 January 2014. But, to start, let’s summarize the first-ever poll that had been done on this, back in 2013, which was the only prior poll on this entire issue, and it was the best-performed such poll: “An end-of-the-year WIN/Gallup International survey found that people in 65 countries believe the United States is the greatest threat to world peace”, as the N.Y. Post reported on 5 January 2014. [...]However, now, on August 1st of 2017, Pew Research Center has issued results of their polling of 30 nations in which they had surveyed, first in 2013, and then again in 2017, posing a less-clear but similar question (vague perhaps because they were fearing a similar type of finding — embarrassing to their own country, the U.S.), in which respondents had been asked “Do you think that the United States’ power and influence is a major threat, a minor threat, or not a threat to (survey country)?” and which also asked this same question but regarding “China,” and then again but regarding “Russia,” as a possible threat instead of “United States.” (This wasn’t an open-ended question; only those three nations were named as possible responses.)On page 3 of their 32-page pdf is shown that the “major threat” category was selected by 35% of respondents worldwide for “U.S. power and influence,” 31% worldwide selected that for “Russia’s power and influence,” and also 31% worldwide said it for “China’s power and influence.” However, on pages 23 and 24 of the pdf is shown the 30 countries that had been surveyed in this poll, in both 2013 and 2017, and most of these 30 nations were U.S. allies; only Venezuela clearly was not. None of the 30 countries was an ally of either Russia or China (the other two countries offered as possibly being “a major threat”). And, yet, nonetheless, more respondents among the 30 sampled countries saw the U.S. as “a major threat,” than saw either Russia or China that way.
Its allies. Yes, I agree, hilariously funny.2. OTHER countries say America is EVIl!!!! BIG SHOCKER there
hahahahaha
View attachment 388267
I suppose laughing is a better option than crying when realising America is considered the major threat to world peace by even its own allies.
As though that will make any difference. You guys are in your own little world.Our "allies" are under review. There'll no doubt be some changes made, since the NWO is no longer a viable excuse to remain buddies.