rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,621
- 224,725
- 3,615
I worked for DoD for 40 years. The defining element is the threat that you face. You develop weapons systems and personnel to counter that threat. In every major weapons or communications system I worked on, your first paragraph in the specification was......Threat DefinitionMuch of our fleet and airframes are quite old. But every military on earth has the same problemIf China wants to take out a carrier, they have the capability
Carriers have always been vulnerable to advanced weapons systems
However, if they were to initiate attacks, we could retaliate by wiping out their entire fleet.
If China attacks us, they will not do it militarily
They will launch a cyber attack
You are correct. We have allowed too much decay in the ship fleets and warplane stock. However we are still the bad boy on the block. If China sank even one escort ship they would pay for it 100 fold so fast and hard they wouldn't have time to heat their dog meat dinner before they had to start swimming. Trump would close down all trade Immediately...effectively constipating their outgoing sea ports.
The article's author is also a bit misinformed. The US Navy does have rail guns. But more to the point they also have littoral craft equipped with satellite guided weaponry that is virtually immune to interception. Within an hour after our loss I have no doubt that a dozen Chinese vessels would be going under.
Jo
Difference is that our equipment is well maintained and upgraded with the latest technology.
I realize that it's heinously expensive and I understand the viewpoint of those who bemoan the enormity of the military budget. However the cost of being number one may be worth the price. There isn't anybody out there who wants to take on the US military conventionally not even China.
Jo
The problem with our military today is there just isn’t the threat like we had in the Cold War. We should have been winding down our military over the last thirty years and used the money on public infrastructure and social programs
Instead, we have created imaginary threats to justify a bloated military