Its cruelty for the sake of being cruel. Americans do not respond to that.
So now enforcing the laws designed to PROTECT Americans is cruelty, huh? How about the many more AMERICANS being separated ? Not cruelty over there ?
The SCAM is coming out in the wash. Now that Trump is doing EO to keep families together, Democrats are movingte goalposts (As they always intended to do). We're seeing the plan, bright and clear now. Here's Sen. marco Rubio's take on it >>
"
Marco Rubio
✔ @marcorubio
The ink isn’t even dry on the new executive order ending separation policy & some Democrats already arguing that keeping families together isn’t enough. Now they want them & their parents released after unlawful entry knowing full well that high % will never appear for hearing
4:06 PM - Jun 20, 2018 17.8K
A few others weighed in too. >>
Monica Crowley
✔ @MonicaCrowley
Because for them, it's never been about "the children." It's always been about open borders.
Tammy Bruce
✔ @HeyTammyBruce
And that has been the point-- force Trump to continue Catch & Release.
The Bushes have NOTHING to say. They perpetrated horrible immigration policies on the American people for 8 years. They're lucky to not all be arrested for treason.
What will Democrats conjure up next ? Pheeeew! Whatever it is, it will probably be something they can use their well-honed
fake outrage skills with.
The Bushes have a lot to say. She is a class act and you are a trash act. you should be arrested for treason.
And again, I just heard, "She agrees with me, so that makes her correct."
Hey, if you want to orgasm over being "validated" by someone famous agreeing with you, knock yourself out. Myself, I'll stick to reality and facts agreeing with me, and continue to not give a rat's ass about name-dropper politics.
Americans trust her more than they do Trump. Franklin Graham also agrees with Laura Bush.
Only if one defines "Americans" as "doofuses who need someone famous to tell them what to think".
Laura Bush is apparently a nice lady. She was a good First Lady. She is noticeably not an expert, or even experienced, in the areas of immigration, law, or governance. I care no more about what she has to say than I do about any garden-variety gland-thinker.
And as near as I can tell, Franklin Graham's big area of expertise is in having a famous father. I don't know that I would necessarily stipulate his expertise in theology, let alone politics and law, because I don't even know the guy.
If your big "victory" move is to trot out a line of celebrities and famous people and say, "HE says this, and SHE says that, and look at all these other people and how famous they are" in the hopes that I'll desperately want to associate myself with them or feel some sort of peer pressure, I'd advise you to give up now.
The facts are the facts; reality is reality. There is no amount of "But it makes me feez BAAAAAADDDD!" that is going to change that, and I'm utterly indifferent to hysterical emotion. (Particularly when I think it's ginned-up fakery on your part, anyway.)