Chicago concealed carry gun owner kills robber...

[2aguy]

Love these stories where a thug bastard gets put down by a carrier!

I'm sure that you do. You are all for vigilante "justice", most gun-nuts are. They can't wait to play John Wayne...

You know, Paint, you really are a despicable piece of shit contrarian. The thug was armed. Not only is he guilty of armed robbery but also aggravated assault. If someone dropped dead of a heart attack during the robbery then the thug would be guilty of felony murder.

Fuck that scum fuck. If you have a weapon confronting someone for whatever reason then you are putting a reasonable person in apprehension of immediate death or severe bodily injury, in which case deadly force is both legal and appropriate.,

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

yet....and you don't know what his final plans were do you?

 

[2aguy]

Anyone that commits armed robbery deserves to get shot. It should be a capital offense.

I'm afraid the laws of this nation completely disagree. Money is not worth a human life.

You completely miss the point, moron. The shooting was in self defense. The victims had no way of knowing whether he would have killed one or more of them.

No, it wasn't in self-defense, hence the problem. The guy wanted money, not to kill anyone.

How do you know? the

Love these stories where a thug bastard gets put down by a carrier!

I'm sure that you do. You are all for vigilante "justice", most gun-nuts are. They can't wait to play John Wayne...

Nope, just love seeing you leftist pigs take a punch in the gut over the reality of concealed carry: it protects people from the scum that the left loves to champion.

Killing a guy who probably would have left peacefully with some cash is not protecting society. That is not worth a human life. That is why nearly everything like that has,as policy, do what he says and give him the cash. Do not go after him or you're fired. That is for the protection of the customers and the staff.

Yeah...except for this time....

Yes…..leaving a gun free zone means you are "gun free" when you leave the zone…and that is just what criminals like….you are vetted for crime by the gun free policies of gun grabbers….

And get this….the guy gave the robber what he wanted, and the robber shot him anyway….

Sooo…

Baseball Fan Shot While Leaving Gun Free Stadium AFTER Complying With Robbers, No One Is Around To Protect Him | Concealed Nation

ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI — A 43-year-old man was leaving a Cardinals game at Busch Stadium with his girlfriend Saturday when the couple were robbed at gunpoint.

They complied, and were shot at while trying to run away after handing over their valuables. One of the bullets struck the 43-year-old, Christopher Sanna, in the back.

The bullet damaged Sanna’s spinal cord and it is unlikely he will ever be able to walk again.

“They said it was shattered, and no surgery could repair it,” said his mother, Candis Sanna. “They said he could eventually get a little feeling back, but there was no hope for him to walk. It’s horrible.”

This incident is a sad reminder of how compliance with an armed robber can still have devastating consequences.

“They turned to run away, but they didn’t make it very far,” Candis Sanna said. “As soon as they gave them the stuff, they were going to try to run away, but he shot them. They were within arm’s reach.”

So…….which anti gun extremist self defense technique saved this man…..let's review the 3 anti gun extremist self defense techniques as applied to this situation:

1) hope the robber who plans on shooting you after he gets your stuff is kind….

2) Hope the robber who plans on shooting you after he gets your stuff is incompetent…

3) Hope that when you are robbed by a sociopath who is going to shoot you anyway doesn't kill you because of pure, dumb luck…..

Okay…..

1) Apparently the kindness of a sociopath who was going to shoot his victim was not in evidence here

2) if the robber was planning on killing the victim…he did shoot him after all….he only shot him in the spine and crippled him for life…so a win for the anti gun extremists, no one was killed…right? And so we could say the robber was incompetent….

3) pure dumb luck…if surviving being shot, but being left paralyzed is lucky….so sure….number 3 applies as well….

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Love these stories where a thug bastard gets put down by a carrier!

I'm sure that you do. You are all for vigilante "justice", most gun-nuts are. They can't wait to play John Wayne...

You know, Paint, you really are a despicable piece of shit contrarian. The thug was armed. Not only is he guilty of armed robbery but also aggravated assault. If someone dropped dead of a heart attack during the robbery then the thug would be guilty of felony murder.

Fuck that scum fuck. If you have a weapon confronting someone for whatever reason then you are putting a reasonable person in apprehension of immediate death or severe bodily injury, in which case deadly force is both legal and appropriate.,

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

yet....and you don't know what his final plans were do you?

No one does but now the state has to work this out. Remember, the more robberies he committed without hurting anyone, the more likely the shooter will be charged with second-degree murder.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'm sure that you do. You are all for vigilante "justice", most gun-nuts are. They can't wait to play John Wayne...

You know, Paint, you really are a despicable piece of shit contrarian. The thug was armed. Not only is he guilty of armed robbery but also aggravated assault. If someone dropped dead of a heart attack during the robbery then the thug would be guilty of felony murder.

Fuck that scum fuck. If you have a weapon confronting someone for whatever reason then you are putting a reasonable person in apprehension of immediate death or severe bodily injury, in which case deadly force is both legal and appropriate.,

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yes..another shooting for Chicago concealed carry permit holders......one day the criminals will get the point that democrats can no longer disarm the victims of crime...the victims can finally shoot back...

AP News - Police: Concealed carry license holder kills armed gunman

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago police say a customer with a concealed carry license shot and killed an armed man attempting to rob a neighborhood store.

Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said a masked man walked into the store and currency exchange about 7 p.m. Saturday on the city's southwest side, displayed a handgun and announced a robbery to an employ

Didn't know that robbery was a capital offense? Interesting.

Ordering the clerk into the back room at gun point changes everything.

I disagree. Had he locked them both in a room, taken the money and gone, no one would have been harmed. To really be in the clear here, you have to wait until the guy starts shooting, at a person.

Dumbest thing I've read all day. So we should wait and let the criminal get the first shot? You're an idiot.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

If he wanted to be protected from a second-degree murder charge, yeppers.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Love these stories where a thug bastard gets put down by a carrier!

I'm sure that you do. You are all for vigilante "justice", most gun-nuts are. They can't wait to play John Wayne...

Nope, just love seeing you leftist pigs take a punch in the gut over the reality of concealed carry: it protects people from the scum that the left loves to champion.

Killing a guy who probably would have left peacefully with some cash is not protecting society. That is not worth a human life. That is why nearly everything like that has,as policy, do what he says and give him the cash. Do not go after him or you're fired. That is for the protection of the customers and the staff.

yes...and how do you know what he plans on doing? are you psychic.....I have seen too many times where the victims are murdered after completely cooperating with the criminal....the Brown's Chicken murders in palatine, Illinois is just one.

Made my point for me, by having to go back to 1993...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yes..another shooting for Chicago concealed carry permit holders......one day the criminals will get the point that democrats can no longer disarm the victims of crime...the victims can finally shoot back...

AP News - Police: Concealed carry license holder kills armed gunman

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago police say a customer with a concealed carry license shot and killed an armed man attempting to rob a neighborhood store.

Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said a masked man walked into the store and currency exchange about 7 p.m. Saturday on the city's southwest side, displayed a handgun and announced a robbery to an employ

Didn't know that robbery was a capital offense? Interesting.

Ordering the clerk into the back room at gun point changes everything.

I disagree. Had he locked them both in a room, taken the money and gone, no one would have been harmed. To really be in the clear here, you have to wait until the guy starts shooting, at a person.

Nope.....if you feel in mortal danger, you can fire.....and it will be up to jurors to decide from the reasonable man standard...

He wasn't being threatened...

 

[Muhammed]

You know, Paint, you really are a despicable piece of shit contrarian. The thug was armed. Not only is he guilty of armed robbery but also aggravated assault. If someone dropped dead of a heart attack during the robbery then the thug would be guilty of felony murder.

Fuck that scum fuck. If you have a weapon confronting someone for whatever reason then you are putting a reasonable person in apprehension of immediate death or severe bodily injury, in which case deadly force is both legal and appropriate.,

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Bullshit.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Bullshit.

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

 

[Muhammed]

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Bullshit.

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Bullshit.

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The article fails to give us the whole story, but what they do offer suggests that the customer was well within his right to kill the gunman.

Had the gunman simply displayed a weapon while ordering the clerk to clean out the register there would have been no need for the customer to intervene.

Displaying a weapon, as a coercive means to separate the innocent of their property, is a threat to the life and safety of everyone present and is a morally sound justification for the use of deadly force.

The individual has indicated their intention to use the firearm, without regard for the well being of those in his presence, thus is a threat to innocent life.

That's not even a debatable point.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Yes..another shooting for Chicago concealed carry permit holders......one day the criminals will get the point that democrats can no longer disarm the victims of crime...the victims can finally shoot back...

AP News - Police: Concealed carry license holder kills armed gunman

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago police say a customer with a concealed carry license shot and killed an armed man attempting to rob a neighborhood store.

Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said a masked man walked into the store and currency exchange about 7 p.m. Saturday on the city's southwest side, displayed a handgun and announced a robbery to an employ

Meanwhile 12 killed and another 26 injured in the last 72 hours by a gun in the rest of the country:

Last 72 Hours | Gun Violence Archive

Leftism happens... . Leftism KILLS!

 

[2aguy]

Love these stories where a thug bastard gets put down by a carrier!

I'm sure that you do. You are all for vigilante "justice", most gun-nuts are. They can't wait to play John Wayne...

You know, Paint, you really are a despicable piece of shit contrarian. The thug was armed. Not only is he guilty of armed robbery but also aggravated assault. If someone dropped dead of a heart attack during the robbery then the thug would be guilty of felony murder.

Fuck that scum fuck. If you have a weapon confronting someone for whatever reason then you are putting a reasonable person in apprehension of immediate death or severe bodily injury, in which case deadly force is both legal and appropriate.,

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

yet....and you don't know what his final plans were do you?

No one does but now the state has to work this out. Remember, the more robberies he committed without hurting anyone, the more likely the shooter will be charged with second-degree murder.

it does

Love these stories where a thug bastard gets put down by a carrier!

I'm sure that you do. You are all for vigilante "justice", most gun-nuts are. They can't wait to play John Wayne...

You know, Paint, you really are a despicable piece of shit contrarian. The thug was armed. Not only is he guilty of armed robbery but also aggravated assault. If someone dropped dead of a heart attack during the robbery then the thug would be guilty of felony murder.

Fuck that scum fuck. If you have a weapon confronting someone for whatever reason then you are putting a reasonable person in apprehension of immediate death or severe bodily injury, in which case deadly force is both legal and appropriate.,

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

yet....and you don't know what his final plans were do you?

No one does but now the state has to work this out. Remember, the more robberies he committed without hurting anyone, the more likely the shooter will be charged with second-degree murder.

n't matter how many other robberies he committed....the prosecutor will have to look at the situation where the shooting actually happened....was it reasonable to shoot him....

 

[2aguy]

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Bullshit.

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Bullshit.

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

 

[Muhammed]

Liar.

 

[Muhammed]

Bullshit.

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Most does not = all.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Most does not = all.

That's correct but the math works, usually...

 

[mgh80]

Yes..another shooting for Chicago concealed carry permit holders......one day the criminals will get the point that democrats can no longer disarm the victims of crime...the victims can finally shoot back...

AP News - Police: Concealed carry license holder kills armed gunman

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago police say a customer with a concealed carry license shot and killed an armed man attempting to rob a neighborhood store.

Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said a masked man walked into the store and currency exchange about 7 p.m. Saturday on the city's southwest side, displayed a handgun and announced a robbery to an employ

Meanwhile 12 killed and another 26 injured in the last 72 hours by a gun in the rest of the country:

Last 72 Hours | Gun Violence Archive

Roughly half of all gun deaths are suicides.

Also, more people die from drunk drivers every year-where's your outrage over that?