Chelsea Handler: ‘My armed guards don’t have semi-automatic weapons’

So she admits she has armed guards like all the rich do. As for her claim they don't have semi-automatic weapons, that is almost certainly a bald-faced lie on her part. Revolvers today are very rare among security professionals.

Chelsea Handler: ‘My armed guards don’t have semi-automatic weapons’

march 30 2018 While engaging in a debate over gun control on Twitter, Chelsea Handler made an astounding claim about her armed security detail:

@chelseahandler
My armed guards aren’t killing children and don’t have semi automatic weapons.
10:32 AM - Mar 28, 2018

Of course, it is not astounding that the former E! Channel, former Netflix and apparently future NBC talk show host has armed security guards who don’t kill children, but the notion that they don’t carry handguns that discharge spent cartridges and load a round of ammunition automatically on each trigger pull is dumbfounding and impossible to believe.


Perhaps they have fully automatic weapons!
 
i laugh at fools having to put words into my mouth just to declare themselves right.

your insecurities are showing. :itsok:
 
armed guards have a lawful purpose for their weaponry.

they should be required to be appropriately trained and licensed for that lawful purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------- ok with me if its their job and their way of making money then that can be REQUIRED Val !!
 
Actually, if ya think about it...
a revolver IS a semi-automatic weapon.
you shoot, the next bullet automatically rolls into place.

Hey einstein. Is the spent cartridge ejected? Does the revolver hold 18 rounds?. Can it be reloaded in two seconds.?
not paying attention...

it's called an 'automatic', because it automatically sets up the next round to be fired,

Correct?

Not because it ejects the spent round, not because of the size of the magazine.

and with a speedloader, it can be reloaded almost as quickly as a magazine.
No the revolver does not automatically set up the next round to be fired. The firing pin hammer is not cocked back & the next round is not chambered. Triple action power pulling trigger does all that work.
 
So they are packing revolvers? what caliber 45? 32? No professional uses those heavy bulky guns anymore...
Education is poorly lacking in this arena...one would think that if you favor doing something as radical as removing a right from the constitution that you would know what the **** you are talking about...that's the problem with the gun issue...too many uninformed uneducated idiots weighing in verbally...



Semi-automatic pistol - Wikipedia
 
but concerning regular Americans owning and using guns , well casual practice in an appropriate place makes for Perfect Val .
 
[QUIOTE="Valerie, post: 19625859, member: 11971"]armed guards have a lawful purpose for their weaponry.

they should be required to be appropriately trained and licensed for that lawful purpose.[/QUOTE]
Are you trying to say that there are no other lawful purposes for having a firearm, such as self defense ?
 
Here's another gem from this colossal idiot:

Chelsea Handler‏Verified account @chelseahandler
Replying to @BreakingNLive
Give those people assault rifles and they kill. Ban assault rifles and they don’t. Why would you support assault rifles? Why is that necessary? I’m not talking about handguns for the 2nd amendment, which by the way was written before assault weapons


10:35 AM - 28 Mar 2018

So according to her, if we get rid of guns like the AR, that will end school shootings, mass shootings, etc.

Apparently my old fashioned wood stock semi-auto rifles, are not lethal.
 
15th post
I believe we have come to a conclusion that some of these dunderheads who have absolutely no idea what they are talking about shouldn't be allowed to have any type of sharp instruments in close proximity to them...
 
armed guards have a lawful purpose for their weaponry.

they should be required to be appropriately trained and licensed for that lawful purpose.
Are you trying to say that there are no other lawful purposes for having a firearm, such as self defense ?


are you all really this dense or just dishonest?

my posts are in response to the op which implies gun control advocates, like chelsea handler, are somehow hypocrites for having body guards.

the concept of LAWFUL PURPOSE is not really that complicated, trumptards.


:uhoh3:
 
armed guards have a lawful purpose for their weaponry.

they should be required to be appropriately trained and licensed for that lawful purpose.
Are you trying to say that there are no other lawful purposes for having a firearm, such as self defense ?


are you all really this dense or just dishonest?

my posts are in response to the op which implies gun control advocates, like chelsea handler, are somehow hypocrites for having body guards.

the concept of LAWFUL PURPOSE is not really that complicated, trumptards.


:uhoh3:
he concept of LAWFUL PURPOSE is not really that complicated,

Kinda falls under the Right to keep and Bear arms, as guaranteed by the Constitution, doesn't it?
 
armed guards have a lawful purpose for their weaponry.

they should be required to be appropriately trained and licensed for that lawful purpose.
Are you trying to say that there are no other lawful purposes for having a firearm, such as self defense ?


are you all really this dense or just dishonest?

my posts are in response to the op which implies gun control advocates, like chelsea handler, are somehow hypocrites for having body guards.

the concept of LAWFUL PURPOSE is not really that complicated, trumptards.


:uhoh3:






The only tard is you. The reality of the 2nd Amendment is it is a memorialisation of the means to defend the PEOPLE from the abuses of the elite. That is why the current anti 2nd Amendment campaign is being funded by BILLIONAIRES. They understand, even if you're not clever enough to do so, that gun control is the ultimate form of Class Warfare.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom