colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Says who?The jury was tainted by the Dems calls for violence if a verdict they didn't like wasn't delivered. The jurors were essentially extorted for a verdict by the Dems
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Says who?The jury was tainted by the Dems calls for violence if a verdict they didn't like wasn't delivered. The jurors were essentially extorted for a verdict by the Dems
frankly, I think she is very brave for coming forward and letting people know that the dems riots, and continued threats of violence really did weight on the jurors. This really explains the very quick turn around.That alternate juror didn't sound one bit intimidated. I wonder though if there are rightwingers out there trying to dox the jurors as we speak, like they've been trying to dox the cop that shot Ashli Babbitt.She thought he was guilty and would have voted that way, but she was an alternate and did not participate in the decision. The actual jurors' names have not been released.
Before the trial, she was asked if she wanted to be a juror, and said her feelings were mixed....but after she had sat through the trial she would have voted guilty anyway. So why a retrial?
Her comments on the jurors not using their real names and keeping away from discussion giving out personal information...yeah not hard to conclude people felt intimidated of being doxxed. Personally I don't think there will be an appeal, because the courts have also been intimidated. What's interesting is that intimidation of the crowd gathered around Floyd during the 9 minutes played apart in the actions of law enforcement.
People have the same right to know the cop who kill Babbitt they same way they had a right to know the cop who killed Floyd. As for this women she acknowledges people were intimidated as why they didn't want to disclose personal information to the other jurors. She's an idiot and I won't be surprised if she receives threats for giving an interview.
Did you not read the OP? The jurors!Says who?The jury was tainted by the Dems calls for violence if a verdict they didn't like wasn't delivered. The jurors were essentially extorted for a verdict by the Dems
Which juror said this?One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
It's garbage that her consideration about that BEFORE the trial somehow means it influenced her final decision, or that it means ALL the actual jurors felt that way. Of course, anyone would think of that when they were called up. But at least this particular woman was relieved to find she didn't have to worry about it because he was clearly guilty.So why do you think it's garage that a juror was concerned about riots in response to her verdict?WTF?Why don't you believe in Due Process?Bald garbage piece. Sounds like Breitbart.Justice served. The article was about an alternate juror who didn’t get a standing and said the cop was guilty. Separately the article throws in an anonymous “quote” from “one juror” that has no context and has a broken link for citation. BULLSHIT.
I do believe in sound reporting though. And clear thinking.
well the consideration BEFORE the trial is the issue...bringing those concerns in into the panel of jurors is the issue.It's garbage that her consideration about that BEFORE the trial somehow means it influenced her final decision, or that it means ALL the actual jurors felt that way. Of course, anyone would think of that when they were called up. But at least this particular woman was relieved to find she didn't have to worry about it because he was clearly guilty.So why do you think it's garage that a juror was concerned about riots in response to her verdict?WTF?Why don't you believe in Due Process?Bald garbage piece. Sounds like Breitbart.Justice served. The article was about an alternate juror who didn’t get a standing and said the cop was guilty. Separately the article throws in an anonymous “quote” from “one juror” that has no context and has a broken link for citation. BULLSHIT.
I do believe in sound reporting though. And clear thinking.
One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
Why? I don't get it.well the consideration BEFORE the trial is the issue....if she wasn't concerned until after her job was donIt's garbage that her consideration about that BEFORE the trial somehow means it influenced her final decision, or that it means ALL the actual jurors felt that way. Of course, anyone would think of that when they were called up. But at least this particular woman was relieved to find she didn't have to worry about it because he was clearly guilty.So why do you think it's garage that a juror was concerned about riots in response to her verdict?WTF?Why don't you believe in Due Process?Bald garbage piece. Sounds like Breitbart.Justice served. The article was about an alternate juror who didn’t get a standing and said the cop was guilty. Separately the article throws in an anonymous “quote” from “one juror” that has no context and has a broken link for citation. BULLSHIT.
I do believe in sound reporting though. And clear thinking.
why will he get an appeal...he is a white cop who killed a black man and got convicted...the powers that are cannot allow this...the implication of white men being held responsible for their actions wont fly...simple as that..
I know...obviously you don't care about Due ProcessWhy? I don't get it.well the consideration BEFORE the trial is the issue....if she wasn't concerned until after her job was donIt's garbage that her consideration about that BEFORE the trial somehow means it influenced her final decision, or that it means ALL the actual jurors felt that way. Of course, anyone would think of that when they were called up. But at least this particular woman was relieved to find she didn't have to worry about it because he was clearly guilty.So why do you think it's garage that a juror was concerned about riots in response to her verdict?WTF?Why don't you believe in Due Process?Bald garbage piece. Sounds like Breitbart.Justice served. The article was about an alternate juror who didn’t get a standing and said the cop was guilty. Separately the article throws in an anonymous “quote” from “one juror” that has no context and has a broken link for citation. BULLSHIT.
I do believe in sound reporting though. And clear thinking.
She thought he was guilty and would have voted that way, but she was an alternate and did not participate in the decision. The actual jurors' names have not been released.
Before the trial, she was asked if she wanted to be a juror, and said her feelings were mixed....but after she had sat through the trial she would have voted guilty anyway. So why a retrial?
Are you afraid an actual fair trial might result in a different decision? Waters yapping to the press alone is enough.She thought he was guilty and would have voted that way, but she was an alternate and did not participate in the decision. The actual jurors' names have not been released.
Before the trial, she was asked if she wanted to be a juror, and said her feelings were mixed....but after she had sat through the trial she would have voted guilty anyway. So why a retrial?
Another juror said he was found guilty because the prosecution presented a good case for guilt.One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
I think the State did a great job too...but sadly due to the mob, backed, supported, both with money and with praise and encouragement by the Dems, their work is tainted.Another juror said he was found guilty because the prosecution presented a good case for guilt.One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
I think his mom posts here or something.You want me to repeat myself?Do we think you are dumb?One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
Do you think we are that dumb.
Kyle is a writer and producer for Fox News' #1 cable primetime show Hannity. He is a veteran of award-winning digital news startup Independent Journal Review. He was one of the initial hires as a freelance Content Creator and quickly became Senior Managing Editor and then Director of Viral Media.
Kyle Becker’s Biography | Muck Rack
View attachment 483010
Yes.
Next question.
Really, all that is needed here is blabbering Maxine Waters threatening the world along with her side kicks Biden and Obama for an appeal.
The judge also chose not to sequester the jury, so they saw all of it.
You must think we , the democrats, are stupid.
Do you really think that will help you understand any better?
Here, let me sooth your angst with a Joe Biden moment that probably made you vote for him
" ... I got hairy legs that turn, that, that, that turn blonde in the sun. And the kids used to come up and reach into the pool and pull and rub my leg down so it was straight, and watch the hair come back up again ... So I learned about roaches. I learned about kids jumping up my lap. And I love kids jumping up my lap."
I voted for Joe Biden, take that you lover of tramp cult.
I knew their was atleast one person who actually voted for Biden.
Are you afraid an actual fair trial might result in a different decision? Waters yapping to the press alone is enough.She thought he was guilty and would have voted that way, but she was an alternate and did not participate in the decision. The actual jurors' names have not been released.
Before the trial, she was asked if she wanted to be a juror, and said her feelings were mixed....but after she had sat through the trial she would have voted guilty anyway. So why a retrial?
Did any of them hear Mad Maxie Pads statements before verdict. That is a defiite mistrial.lololThis is a mistrial, and now Chauvin can appeal the decision and get the trial declared a mistrial, and it's a slam dunk.
-------------
‘I Didn’t Want to Go Through the Rioting’: Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over ‘Guilty’ Verdict
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News