Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
They asked no questions or sought any clarifications from the judge.
....a sure indication that they were too terrified to vote anything but guilty due to democrat fascist intimidation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They asked no questions or sought any clarifications from the judge.
Due process is part of our US laws.....Dims have no interest in any of that.I know...obviously you don't care about Due ProcessWhy? I don't get it.well the consideration BEFORE the trial is the issue....if she wasn't concerned until after her job was donIt's garbage that her consideration about that BEFORE the trial somehow means it influenced her final decision, or that it means ALL the actual jurors felt that way. Of course, anyone would think of that when they were called up. But at least this particular woman was relieved to find she didn't have to worry about it because he was clearly guilty.So why do you think it's garage that a juror was concerned about riots in response to her verdict?WTF?Why don't you believe in Due Process?Bald garbage piece. Sounds like Breitbart.Justice served. The article was about an alternate juror who didn’t get a standing and said the cop was guilty. Separately the article throws in an anonymous “quote” from “one juror” that has no context and has a broken link for citation. BULLSHIT.
I do believe in sound reporting though. And clear thinking.
But when a juror comes into a jury box, with bias, or prejudice, or in this case, concerns about violence if they don't deliver a certain verdict...the jury is tainted...the Defendant does not get a fair trial, which means not proper Due Process.
Jurors are suppose to be impartial, not concerned about things outside of the Courtroom. In this case, one of the jurors has admitted that wasn't the case.
This is what one party rule looks likeThis is a mistrial, and now Chauvin can appeal the decision and get the trial declared a mistrial, and it's a slam dunk.
-------------
‘I Didn’t Want to Go Through the Rioting’: Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over ‘Guilty’ Verdict
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
About 12 times right?You want me to repeat myself?Do we think you are dumb?One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
Do you think we are that dumb.
Kyle is a writer and producer for Fox News' #1 cable primetime show Hannity. He is a veteran of award-winning digital news startup Independent Journal Review. He was one of the initial hires as a freelance Content Creator and quickly became Senior Managing Editor and then Director of Viral Media.
Kyle Becker’s Biography | Muck Rack
View attachment 483010
Yes.
Next question.
Really, all that is needed here is blabbering Maxine Waters threatening the world along with her side kicks Biden and Obama for an appeal.
The judge also chose not to sequester the jury, so they saw all of it.
You must think we , the democrats, are stupid.
Do you really think that will help you understand any better?
Here, let me sooth your angst with a Joe Biden moment that probably made you vote for him
" ... I got hairy legs that turn, that, that, that turn blonde in the sun. And the kids used to come up and reach into the pool and pull and rub my leg down so it was straight, and watch the hair come back up again ... So I learned about roaches. I learned about kids jumping up my lap. And I love kids jumping up my lap."
I voted for Joe Biden, take that you lover of tramp cult.
Mistrial? The trial is over. There is no mistrial possible. Perhaps you are thinking about an appeal instead?Obviously this is going to mistrial and because of political pressure retrial.One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
No. If you’re scared you convict on the maximum and hope it’s enough. According to many leftists like you it isn’t enough but a good first step. Welcome to America 2021, the racist bigoted terrible country. Truth over Facts.Unfortunately the jury sent a completely different message. If they were afraid of backlash, and didn't think Chauvin guilty, they would have convicted him of 2nd degree manslaughter, and not guilty of the murder charges.The judge is already aware of jury intimidation. He was one step away from declaring a mistrial himself.
He also made it very clear that on an appeal, a mistrial could very easily be declared.
Now it's a slam dunk.
Instead they found him guilty of all counts ,and did so by unanimous verdict in record time. It may seem strange to you, but the jury paid attention to the evidence presented, and it wasn't even close. They asked no questions or sought any clarifications from the judge.
How can one have a mistrial when the trial is over? Eh? I'm fascinated by the legal knowledge of our Chauvin supporters here.One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
Clearly a mistrial since the jurors are pussies.
Did he say that's why he voted guilty? Just because of potential rioting?
Hopped up on fentanyl? Obviously you don't know what fentanyl is.He wasn't murdered. He O.D. on fentanyl. He had three times the amount of an overdose in his system. Had he not been a junkie hopped up on a deadly dose of fentanyl, he'd be alive today. He killed himself.
"innocent police officer"? Oh honey!One juror: "I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again and I was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the verdict."
Appeal on the way.
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
On Tuesday, a jury found Derek Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in a case that had sparked nationwide riots: The death of George Floyd. During the course of the trial, Judge Peter Cahill mentioned that the court case was getting...beckernews.com
In other words this stupid cowardly shithead let the assholes get away with convicting an innocent police officer for the same reasons the Supreme Court let the Democrats get away with stealing an election.
Our country is pretty well fucked now.
These libturds are so damned dumb it is absolutely incredible.Did any of them hear Mad Maxie Pads statements before verdict. That is a defiite mistrial.lololThis is a mistrial, and now Chauvin can appeal the decision and get the trial declared a mistrial, and it's a slam dunk.
-------------
‘I Didn’t Want to Go Through the Rioting’: Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over ‘Guilty’ Verdict
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
Thanks for such good and joyous news on this blessed day.The judge is already aware of jury intimidation. He was one step away from declaring a mistrial himself.Fine. If the judge delays sentencing until 2061Just sentence him to time served.
He also made it very clear that on an appeal, a mistrial could very easily be declared.
Now it's a slam dunk.
You will be hard pressed to find a jury who haven't seen any of the Chauvin trial. The only "impartial" jury you could find would be harder to find than unicorns.Clearly a mistrial -----------------clearly needs to change the venue out of the state as well. I suggest Florida---where we can run over the violent rioters with a smile on our faces..
That just blows my mind how with a trial this high profile they were not sequestered.duh.
. . . I haven't been following this trial AT ALL.
I just didn't care.
I only found out yesterday that the Jury wasn't sequestered. I mean, really? They had their phones and access to all that media that entire time?
wtf?
"Lock Her Up!" "Lock Her Up!"Due process is part of our US laws.....Dims have no interest in any of that.I know...obviously you don't care about Due ProcessWhy? I don't get it.well the consideration BEFORE the trial is the issue....if she wasn't concerned until after her job was donIt's garbage that her consideration about that BEFORE the trial somehow means it influenced her final decision, or that it means ALL the actual jurors felt that way. Of course, anyone would think of that when they were called up. But at least this particular woman was relieved to find she didn't have to worry about it because he was clearly guilty.So why do you think it's garage that a juror was concerned about riots in response to her verdict?WTF?Why don't you believe in Due Process?Bald garbage piece. Sounds like Breitbart.Justice served. The article was about an alternate juror who didn’t get a standing and said the cop was guilty. Separately the article throws in an anonymous “quote” from “one juror” that has no context and has a broken link for citation. BULLSHIT.
I do believe in sound reporting though. And clear thinking.
But when a juror comes into a jury box, with bias, or prejudice, or in this case, concerns about violence if they don't deliver a certain verdict...the jury is tainted...the Defendant does not get a fair trial, which means not proper Due Process.
Jurors are suppose to be impartial, not concerned about things outside of the Courtroom. In this case, one of the jurors has admitted that wasn't the case.
They can be intimidated to find Chauvin guilty of "something", but not to find him guilty of "everything"They asked no questions or sought any clarifications from the judge.
....a sure indication that they were too terrified to vote anything but guilty due to democrat fascist intimidation.
Ironic post is Ironic.These libturds are so damned dumb it is absolutely incredible.Did any of them hear Mad Maxie Pads statements before verdict. That is a defiite mistrial.lololThis is a mistrial, and now Chauvin can appeal the decision and get the trial declared a mistrial, and it's a slam dunk.
-------------
‘I Didn’t Want to Go Through the Rioting’: Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over ‘Guilty’ Verdict
'I Didn't Want to Go Through the Rioting': Juror in Chauvin Trial Makes Stunning Admission over 'Guilty' Verdict - Becker News
Thanks for such good and joyous news on this blessed day.The judge is already aware of jury intimidation. He was one step away from declaring a mistrial himself.Fine. If the judge delays sentencing until 2061Just sentence him to time served.
He also made it very clear that on an appeal, a mistrial could very easily be declared.
Now it's a slam dunk.
The problem is that the persecution was working to get people to vote guilty based on the jury's desire to avoid Rioting, not on the guilt or innocence of the defendant.
Reminds me of the trial of Jesus H. Christ, where Mr. Pilate wanted to avoid problems with the local leaders and condemned Him even though the facts of the case didn't justify it.
That's not the American system, Officer Chauvin deserves a trial by jurors who could give a shit less if the cities of America burn
Unfortunately the jury sent a completely different message. If they were afraid of backlash, and didn't think Chauvin guilty, they would have convicted him of 2nd degree manslaughter, and not guilty of the murder charges.
If they convicted because of "public pressure" they would have convicted on the lowest change only. They sent a message that it wasn't public pressure, because they found him guilty of all charges.No. If you’re scared you convict on the maximum and hope it’s enough.