Charges Filed-- Hillary Clinton Charged With Racketeering

Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

In this case a plaintiff files a lawsuit. To be charged is criminal. charge legal definition of charge
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.
You teapers are ridiculous. Your lies, hyperbole and hysteria are destroying the GOP. But, I guess you found the right place to spew your lies. There are a lot of lemmings who believe anything on the interweb and you are allowed to spew such nonsense.

Clinton is useless enough...all you do is give her more power and sympathy when you post nonsensical les. t s lke you are working against conservatism. What a douche.
You selected an apt avatar.
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

In this case a plaintiff files a lawsuit. To be charged is criminal. charge legal definition of charge
Exactly...OP's title s a typical teaper lie.

Rubber room.
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

In this case a plaintiff files a lawsuit. To be charged is criminal. charge legal definition of charge
No, to charge suggests movement. If YOU charge someone in real life you are moving forward. So the definition in this case would be JW is moving forward with their complaint.
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.
You teapers are ridiculous. Your lies, hyperbole and hysteria are destroying the GOP. But, I guess you found the right place to spew your lies. There are a lot of lemmings who believe anything on the interweb and you are allowed to spew such nonsense.

Clinton is useless enough...all you do is give her more power and sympathy when you post nonsensical les. t s lke you are working against conservatism. What a douche.
You selected an apt avatar.
Are you a lemmng that believes anything he reads on the interweb?
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

In this case a plaintiff files a lawsuit. To be charged is criminal. charge legal definition of charge
No, to charge suggests movement. If YOU charge someone in real life you are moving forward. So the definition in this case would be JW is moving forward with their complaint.

Nice try but no cigar. In an article like this - charged is meant to imply a criminal charge. Not some esoteric definition like "moving forward".
 
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.
You teapers are ridiculous. Your lies, hyperbole and hysteria are destroying the GOP. But, I guess you found the right place to spew your lies. There are a lot of lemmings who believe anything on the interweb and you are allowed to spew such nonsense.

Clinton is useless enough...all you do is give her more power and sympathy when you post nonsensical les. t s lke you are working against conservatism. What a douche.
You selected an apt avatar.
Are you a lemmng that believes anything he reads on the interweb?
No, unless someone calls himself Nutz.
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

No. Only a DA or a US Attorney can bring "charges". Civil suits are lawsuits, not "charges".
 
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

In this case a plaintiff files a lawsuit. To be charged is criminal. charge legal definition of charge
No, to charge suggests movement. If YOU charge someone in real life you are moving forward. So the definition in this case would be JW is moving forward with their complaint.

Nice try but no cigar. In an article like this - charged is meant to imply a criminal charge. Not some esoteric definition like "moving forward".
Charge as in Warfare...From Wiki
Charge or charged may refer to:


................................................................................................................
 
No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

In this case a plaintiff files a lawsuit. To be charged is criminal. charge legal definition of charge
No, to charge suggests movement. If YOU charge someone in real life you are moving forward. So the definition in this case would be JW is moving forward with their complaint.

Nice try but no cigar. In an article like this - charged is meant to imply a criminal charge. Not some esoteric definition like "moving forward".
Charge as in Warfare...From Wiki
Charge or charged may refer to:


................................................................................................................

Are you trying to convince me that this is what you meant by your OP title?
 
No charges have been filed. A civil lawsuit has been filed alleging racketeering. That will keep her busy for awhile.
You think so?
Oh my yes. There will be interrogatories, requests for admission, requests for production of documents, depositions. For her and her staff. She will be quite busy. Sadly for her the Supreme Court already ruled that a sitting president has no immunity from civil suits. That goes double for candidates.

More likely, the lawsuit will be dismissed with prejudice.

Perhaps yet another judge will ban Larry Klayman from his courtroom for life.
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.
Once civil charges are exposed in court, maybe Boehner et al will finally do something, too.

Aside from impeachment (which obviously doesn't apply), Boehner can't "charge" Clinton with anything, either.
 
You know the OP is a BS lie when he spends most of his time trying to convince everyone it isn't a lie. Teapers are fucking pathetic.

Don't worry, Darkie...this is USMB. Rational people KNOW you are lying.
 
100 to 1 the Partisan group Freedom watch's lawsuit will be thrown out.... you can quote me! ;)
We will. I'd say it's a 50/50 right about now. Whether or not it is, it will be in the news between now and next November. This, on top of the rest of her baggage will sink her ship. I'm actually almost hoping she gets the nomination. She will make George McGovern look like a winner.
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

No. Only a DA or a US Attorney can bring "charges". Civil suits are lawsuits, not "charges".
Ever known somebody charged in a divorce? No DA there.
 
Again Dark Fury - there are NO CHARGES filed. Only a lawsuit.
Yet his title is "uncensored" and the thread remains in this forum. Curious, huh?

No. There are no ferals involved. Got a problem Nutz? PM one of us.
Charges CAN be civil or criminal. Charges is what the PLAINTIFF files. If you sue some one for denting your car you ARE charging them for the damage.

No. Only a DA or a US Attorney can bring "charges". Civil suits are lawsuits, not "charges".
Ever known somebody charged in a divorce? No DA there.

No one has ever been "charged" with divorce.

People have, on the other hand, been sued for divorce.
 
100 to 1 the Partisan group Freedom watch's lawsuit will be thrown out.... you can quote me! ;)
We will. I'd say it's a 50/50 right about now. Whether or not it is, it will be in the news between now and next November. This, on top of the rest of her baggage will sink her ship. I'm actually almost hoping she gets the nomination. She will make George McGovern look like a winner.

What makes you think the odds are "50/50", other than that you really, really want them to stick?
 

Forum List

Back
Top