It is about timing.
Harris and Cheney talk economy, women’s health and Trump in Michigan campaign event – as it happened
VP and former Republican congresswoman meet voters in swing state; Trump holds rally in North Carolinawww.theguardian.com
About time. I hope they get some justice out of that evil man. I cant think what his defence will be. Dementia ?
You answered it in your first statement. It is About time. They’ve had all this time. Why now?Harris and Cheney talk economy, women’s health and Trump in Michigan campaign event – as it happened
VP and former Republican congresswoman meet voters in swing state; Trump holds rally in North Carolina
About time. I hope they get some justice out of that evil man. I cant think what his defence will be. Dementia ?
Trump is a crazy man repeating his shit. Maybe he should keeo his lying mouth shut ?
Its impossuble to libel trump. Nothing can be said that makes him look worse.“The former president's comments came after Vice President Kamala Harris said he "took out a full-page ad in The New York Times calling for the execution of five young Black and Latino boys who were innocent, the Central Park Five," according to a news release from the men's attorneys, Shanin Specter and Alexander Van Dyke. In response to Harris, Trump allegedly said the men "admitted – they said, they pled guilty. And I said, well, if they pled guilty they badly hurt a person, killed a person ultimately.”
'Central Park Five' suing Trump for 'defamatory' comments made during presidential debate
The members of the 'Central Park Five' are suing Donald Trump for comments he made during the ABC News presidential debate last month.www.usatoday.com
That’s what they are suing about? If that’s the case, Trump should sue Kamala for falsely saying he called white suprecists “very fine people” at the debate.
Notice how these lawsuits are all from one side of the political isle?
The internet jury is all seeing.
Get help you sad ******.“Meaningless: It’s a sleight of hand to say that there was “no DNA evidence” tying The Five to the crime. Yeah, that’s probably because in 1989, no one would have been looking for DNA.
Back then, DNA testing was a novel scientific technique. It required much larger samples than are necessary today, and the sample couldn’t be contaminated and the tests weren’t reliable.
You might as well complain that the police didn’t use cellphone tracking, either.
In New York, only a few criminal courts had even been faced with the decision of whether to admit DNA evidence, and no appellate court had ruled on its admissibility.
On the eve of the trial a year later, semen found on the jogger was sent to the FBI for testing (result inconclusive) over the ferocious objections of lawyers for The Five, who argued that “DNA testing is an area still under study and under consideration and has not been regarded in the scientific community of sufficient reliability as to permit its admission into evidence.
Investigators would have been insane to count on DNA to prove their case. No effort would have been made to collect and preserve it. Just three months before the rape, serial killer Ted Bundy had been executed without anyone thinking to run a DNA test.“
Ann Coulter: Central Park Five: The secret files - Marshall News Messenger
In an article about the election of Yusef Salaam, of the “Central Park Five,” to the New York City Council last week, The New York Times’ Jeffery C. Mays indignantly cited the full-page ad Donald Trump had taken out at the time, which never mentioned the Central Park rape but decried crime in...www.marshallnewsmessenger.com
“(11) Santana: Location of Attack
Following his videotaped interview, Santana and his father were driven home by Detective Michael Sheehan to get fresh clothing, stopping at the 102nd Street transverse road along the way. When asked where the attack occurred, Santana pointed north of the transverse road down towards the ravine. They walked into the woods and Santana said that it was too dark to find anything else.
(12) Richardson: Reference to Woman
While interviewed by P.O. Powers, on April 20, 1989 at 6:00 PM, the officer asked Richardson who he thought was hurt worse, the man or the woman. Richardson replied that he thought “the man looked worse than the woman.”
(13) Richardson: Reference to “Getting Her”
After being brought back to the crime scene on the morning of April 20th, Richardson, while standing on the 102nd Street transverse, told Detective Sheehan that, “This is where we got her.”
(14) Richardson: Scene
Later that morning on a second trip to the scene, Richardson accurately identified an area northwest of a large tree on the slope north of the transverse as the area where “the raping occurred.”
(15) Wise: “That’s a lot of blood”
After being brought back to the crime scene by Detective Sheehan and Assistant District Attorney Fairstein on the morning of April 20th, and while walking down towards the spot where the rape occurred, Wise was overheard muttering, “Damn, damn that’s a lot of blood. Damn, this is really bad, that’s a lot of blood.” When asked why he was so surprised by the amount of blood, he answered, “I knew she was bleeding but I didn’t know how bad she was. It was really dark. I couldn’t see how much blood there was at night.” (See Hearing Transcript pp. 4560-4561, 4569.)
(16) Wise: Reference to Rape – “We” and “They”
When asked if he was familiar with the area, Wise responded, “This is where we” and stopped and finished “they raped her.” When asked what happened here, Wise says, “This is where they dragged her.” Again he started to say “we” and changed to “they.”
Doesn’t answer the question as to why now.
Tommy is quite the intellect.
Its pretty obvious to adults. Think about it.
