Central Park 5 sue Trump for his lies

By that time, the Jury Pool was biased against the five innocent boys and Donald J Trump helped fan the flames.

Today, rather than apologize for his role and admitting he is wrong……Trump continues to spread the lies

That is why he will pay Bigly


Of course, it's commie NY, everything is predetermined.

.
 
And TRUMP took out a full page ad in the paper calling for their execution
No actually he called for the reinstatement of the death penalty for such a horrible crime.

Did that case inspire him to ask for it back? Yes. But he was a simple citizen of NYC, at the time believing in demafacist DAs

He’s learned. You haven’t
 
Deleted

Incorrect
 
Last edited:
Really. I think you’re lying.

Let’s see if he was talking about them in particular or the death penalty as a whole.

Because newsflash… rape and assault are not capital crimes
Well read the Ad he took out

What’s clear is the demklan DA wrongfully prosecuted these kids and told the public they did it

The demklan abuse of govt is nothing new
 
Well read the Ad he took out

What’s clear is the demklan DA wrongfully prosecuted these kids and told the public they did it

The demklan abuse of govt is nothing new
I did and deleted the post.

But I did find out that Trump took out not ONE ad but FOUR full page ads in FOUR newspapers including The NY Times and conflated the rape and assault in this incident with murder and called for the death penalty.
 
I did and deleted the post.

But I did find out that Trump took out not ONE ad but FOUR full page ads in FOUR newspapers including The NY Times and conflated the rape and assault in this incident with murder and called for the death penalty.
Yeah they all said the same thing and advocated for the death penalty due to violent crime in NY.

It did come back

And frankly but for the demklan DA falsely accusing these kids it wouldn’t have.
 
At a minimum these thugs were predatory scum who admittedly victimized people that night as part of a roving mob of animals.



“Meili and doctors Kurtz and Haher said there was medical evidence to support the charge that more than one person was responsible for her attack. Her injuries were different from what Reyes claimed as the sole attacker, Meili said.

"There were hand prints pressed into her skin that looked red in outline," Kurtz said.

Haher said the hand prints were of different sizes as well.”

 
At a minimum these thugs were predatory scum who admittedly victimized people that night as part of a roving mob of animals.



“Meili and doctors Kurtz and Haher said there was medical evidence to support the charge that more than one person was responsible for her attack. Her injuries were different from what Reyes claimed as the sole attacker, Meili said.

"There were hand prints pressed into her skin that looked red in outline," Kurtz said.

Haher said the hand prints were of different sizes as well.”

So why didn't they match them up to these innocent teenagers?

I know it's hard to take the hood off.
 
So why didn't they match them up to these innocent teenagers?

I know it's hard to take the hood off.
This is a new concept in law. Convicting folk for fitting a description in your head.
It dispenses with old concepts like proof, truth and justice. Anyone can do it. All you need is a rope and a tree.
Its really very domocratic. In fact its a throwback to the golden age of American justice when the white majority was able to deal justice based on their personal prejudice.
Who could complain about that ?
 
15th post
This is a new concept in law. Convicting folk for fitting a description in your head.
It dispenses with old concepts like proof, truth and justice. Anyone can do it. All you need is a rope and a tree.
Its really very domocratic. In fact its a throwback to the golden age of American justice when the white majority was able to deal justice based on their personal prejudice.
Who could complain about that ?
It is an old concept when it comes to convicting black folks.
 
At a minimum these thugs were predatory scum who admittedly victimized people that night as part of a roving mob of animals.



“Meili and doctors Kurtz and Haher said there was medical evidence to support the charge that more than one person was responsible for her attack. Her injuries were different from what Reyes claimed as the sole attacker, Meili said.

"There were hand prints pressed into her skin that looked red in outline," Kurtz said.

Haher said the hand prints were of different sizes as well.”

In a severely brutal attack where the woman almost bled to death, none of the boys had a spot of blood on them or left any DNA.
Also, none of the five correctly identified where the attack took place
 
So why didn't they match them up to these innocent teenagers?

I know it's hard to take the hood off.
Match who up to them? The hand prints? A bruised hand print isn’t unique like a finger print. Anyone with that size hand would roughly match the print. The point you fail to comprehend is that one size hand won’t make different size hand prints.

I know you do the best you can under that helmet.
 
Match who up to them? The hand prints? A bruised hand print isn’t unique like a finger print. Anyone with that size hand would roughly match the print. The point you fail to comprehend is that one size hand won’t make different size hand prints.

I know you do the best you can under that helmet.

LOL, as long as your print roughly matches up, you are guilty.

Funny if not such a sad statement.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom