Must be a bitch for you slugs to see your PROTECTED STATUS that the Party of INFANTICIDE brought to you slipping away as the MUSLIMS are the NEW PROTECTED GROUP by the CommieRATS!!
We dont need protected status. Being Black is amazing. You white boys are the ones that needed government land grants, Jim Crow and before that slavery. You sorry ass SOBs are weak.
Yes, DemonRAT policies sure were draconian and yet the 2 of you will continue to suck DemoKKKrat dicks....shows the true intelligence of you apes!
Associate Justice Joseph Bradley, a REPUBLICAN struck down the 1875 Civil Rights Act.
Bradley said the following, holding the Constitution did
"not authorize Congress to create a code of municipal law for the regulation of private rights," as distinct from "state" laws. In effect, only state bodies were sufficiently "public" so as to be regulated.
.. individual invasion of individual rights is not the subject-matter of the [Fourteenth] Amendment. It has a deeper and broader scope. It nullifies and makes void all state legislation, and state action of every kind, which impairs the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, or which injures them in life, liberty or property without due process of law, or which denies to any of them the equal protection of the laws. ...
It does not invest congress with power to legislate upon subjects which are within the domain of state legislation; but to provide modes of relief against state legislation, or state action, of the kind referred to. It does not authorize congress to create a code of municipal law for the regulation of private rights; but to provide modes of redress against the operation of state laws, and the action of state officers, executive or judicial, when these are subversive of the fundamental rights specified in the amendment. Positive rights and privileges are undoubtedly secured by the fourteenth amendment; but they are secured by way of prohibition against state laws and state proceedings affecting those rights and privileges, and by power given to congress to legislate for the purpose of carrying such prohibition into effect; and such legislation must necessarily be predicated upon such supposed state laws or state proceedings, and be directed to the correction of their operation and effect. A quite full discussion of this aspect of the amendment may be found in U. S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542; Virginia v. Rives, 100 U. S. 313, and Ex parte Virginia, Id. 339.
Shut up white boy before I make an example out of you.