Celebrating Failure???

[Dot Com]

You still googling your insults PoliticalSpice?

Anyway our two-term Democrat African American President has dragged this great nation out of the Great Repub Recession DESPITE the Repubs in Congress and their obstruction.

Sucks to be a rw historical revisionist (you )

 

[PoliticalChic]

PoliSpice and her walls of text

And she keeps citing CNSNews of ll places

How about you attempt to show that the facts provided are incorrect.

If you think I'm going to follow those rw hack links only to get bombarded w/ Newsmaxx ads, you're sorely mistaken PoliSpice

If you want to be taken seriously, stop w/ the use of sites such as CNSNews, breitbart, TheDailyCaller lol, TheWeeklyStandard, etc...

You might as well just cite the RNC dummy because those are communications arms of it.

Here's more, you liar"

"....according to the BLS, the main reason why the unemployment rate tumbled to the lowest since April 2008 is because another 261,000 Americans dropped out of the labor force, as a result pushing the total number of US potential workers who are not in the labor force, to a record 94 million, an increase of 1.8 million in the past year, and a whopping 14.9 million since the start of the second great depression in December 2007 while only 4 million new jobs have been created."
Record 94 Million Americans Not In The Labor Force; Participation Rate Lowest Since 1977 | Zero Hedge

Ah, Zero Hedge does like to sensationalize and spin. BLS has not and would not use the phrase "dropped out." Especially since the biggest reason for the drop in labor force participation has come from the elderly.

But let's look at those Not in the Labor Force: A-38. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex
89 million DO NOT WANT A JOB NOW.
Of the 5.3 million who say they do want a job, 3.1 million have done nothing at all...not one application filled out, not one resume sent, not one reply to a classified, not even asking friends or relatives....in the previous year. Sorry, I don't think that someone who can't be bothered to do anything at all to get work in over a year really wants a job. Do you?
So of the 2.3 million who say they want a job and have looked in the last year but not the last month, half a million say they couldn't start work right away even if they were handed a job.
That leaves us with 1.7 million marginally attached. People who want to and are available for work and who have tried to get work recently, but stopped.
1.1 million stopped looking to take care of family or go back to school or were otherwise unable to work for personal reasons.

So, why do you think 94 million people Not in the Labor Force is a problem? Most are retired, disabled, students, or stay-home spouses.

Hmmm.....why so shy?
I asked you this: "True or not....BLS figures support my claim as to the number out of the work force."



Here....let me help you: as per the BLS figures, I have been proven totally and unequivocally correct......a condition to which I am accustomed.



"Total not in the labor force

94,407 [November 2015]"
A-38. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

94,407,000

Now....why didn't you say that immediately?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You still googling your insults PoliticalSpice?

Anyway our two-term Democrat African American President has dragged this great nation out of the Great Repub Recession DESPITE the Repubs in Congress and their obstruction.

Sucks to be a rw historical revisionist (you )

Look who's back!

The very one I exposed as a lying Liberal!

The post just above is more mud in your eye.

 

[Dot Com]

I bet PoliticalChic's one of those crazy people that covers all the walls in her cabin with printouts from RWNJ sites, floor to ceiling.

yep That wall of text from ystrdy proved it

Over half of the *cough* "sources" were also sites such as CNSNews, The Weekly Standard, Breitbart, The Daily Caller and NOT expecting to be called on it is laughable.

She posts like a patient on a psych ward, not that theres anything unusual about that given she's ab overt Randian

She prolly tells the staff "I won, I won!!!" as they escort her away from the Day Room.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I bet PoliticalChic's one of those crazy people that covers all the walls in her cabin with printouts from RWNJ sites, floor to ceiling.

yep That wall of text from ystrdy proved it

Over half of the *cough* "sources" were also sites such as CNSNews, The Weekly Standard, Breitbart, The Daily Caller and NOT expecting to be called on it is laughable.

Welcome to Ouchtown, bro......population you.



So....continuing your lies?

How very Liberal of you.

You 'called' nothing.
Everything I posted was linked, sourced, true and accurate.


I'd call you a low-life gutter snipe....but you must be tired of everyone referring to you thus.

 

[Dot Com]

I changed my mind, OP SHOULDN'T apply to college or university as the first paper she turns in w/ *cough* "sourcing" like she uses here, the Prof is going to

 

[pinqy]

PoliSpice and her walls of text

And she keeps citing CNSNews of ll places

How about you attempt to show that the facts provided are incorrect.

If you think I'm going to follow those rw hack links only to get bombarded w/ Newsmaxx ads, you're sorely mistaken PoliSpice

If you want to be taken seriously, stop w/ the use of sites such as CNSNews, breitbart, TheDailyCaller lol, TheWeeklyStandard, etc...

You might as well just cite the RNC dummy because those are communications arms of it.

Here's more, you liar"

"....according to the BLS, the main reason why the unemployment rate tumbled to the lowest since April 2008 is because another 261,000 Americans dropped out of the labor force, as a result pushing the total number of US potential workers who are not in the labor force, to a record 94 million, an increase of 1.8 million in the past year, and a whopping 14.9 million since the start of the second great depression in December 2007 while only 4 million new jobs have been created."
Record 94 Million Americans Not In The Labor Force; Participation Rate Lowest Since 1977 | Zero Hedge

Ah, Zero Hedge does like to sensationalize and spin. BLS has not and would not use the phrase "dropped out." Especially since the biggest reason for the drop in labor force participation has come from the elderly.

But let's look at those Not in the Labor Force: A-38. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex
89 million DO NOT WANT A JOB NOW.
Of the 5.3 million who say they do want a job, 3.1 million have done nothing at all...not one application filled out, not one resume sent, not one reply to a classified, not even asking friends or relatives....in the previous year. Sorry, I don't think that someone who can't be bothered to do anything at all to get work in over a year really wants a job. Do you?
So of the 2.3 million who say they want a job and have looked in the last year but not the last month, half a million say they couldn't start work right away even if they were handed a job.
That leaves us with 1.7 million marginally attached. People who want to and are available for work and who have tried to get work recently, but stopped.
1.1 million stopped looking to take care of family or go back to school or were otherwise unable to work for personal reasons.

So, why do you think 94 million people Not in the Labor Force is a problem? Most are retired, disabled, students, or stay-home spouses.

Hmmm.....why so shy?
I asked you this: "True or not....BLS figures support my claim as to the number out of the work force."



Here....let me help you: as per the BLS figures, I have been proven totally and unequivocally correct......a condition to which I am accustomed.



"Total not in the labor force

94,407 [November 2015]"
A-38. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

94,407,000

Now....why didn't you say that immediately?

Because I was offline and unable to respond. But you're being silly...I never disputed the number not in the labor force, so it's odd for you to insist I confirm it.

The question is what the number means and if it's bad. But you seem to want to avoid that question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How about you attempt to show that the facts provided are incorrect.

If you think I'm going to follow those rw hack links only to get bombarded w/ Newsmaxx ads, you're sorely mistaken PoliSpice

If you want to be taken seriously, stop w/ the use of sites such as CNSNews, breitbart, TheDailyCaller lol, TheWeeklyStandard, etc...

You might as well just cite the RNC dummy because those are communications arms of it.

Here's more, you liar"

"....according to the BLS, the main reason why the unemployment rate tumbled to the lowest since April 2008 is because another 261,000 Americans dropped out of the labor force, as a result pushing the total number of US potential workers who are not in the labor force, to a record 94 million, an increase of 1.8 million in the past year, and a whopping 14.9 million since the start of the second great depression in December 2007 while only 4 million new jobs have been created."
Record 94 Million Americans Not In The Labor Force; Participation Rate Lowest Since 1977 | Zero Hedge

Ah, Zero Hedge does like to sensationalize and spin. BLS has not and would not use the phrase "dropped out." Especially since the biggest reason for the drop in labor force participation has come from the elderly.

But let's look at those Not in the Labor Force: A-38. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex
89 million DO NOT WANT A JOB NOW.
Of the 5.3 million who say they do want a job, 3.1 million have done nothing at all...not one application filled out, not one resume sent, not one reply to a classified, not even asking friends or relatives....in the previous year. Sorry, I don't think that someone who can't be bothered to do anything at all to get work in over a year really wants a job. Do you?
So of the 2.3 million who say they want a job and have looked in the last year but not the last month, half a million say they couldn't start work right away even if they were handed a job.
That leaves us with 1.7 million marginally attached. People who want to and are available for work and who have tried to get work recently, but stopped.
1.1 million stopped looking to take care of family or go back to school or were otherwise unable to work for personal reasons.

So, why do you think 94 million people Not in the Labor Force is a problem? Most are retired, disabled, students, or stay-home spouses.

Hmmm.....why so shy?
I asked you this: "True or not....BLS figures support my claim as to the number out of the work force."



Here....let me help you: as per the BLS figures, I have been proven totally and unequivocally correct......a condition to which I am accustomed.



"Total not in the labor force

94,407 [November 2015]"
A-38. Persons not in the labor force by desire and availability for work, age, and sex

94,407,000

Now....why didn't you say that immediately?

Because I was offline and unable to respond. But you're being silly...I never disputed the number not in the labor force, so it's odd for you to insist I confirm it.

The question is what the number means and if it's bad. But you seem to want to avoid that question.

1. "...I was offline and unable to respond..."
Welcome back.



2. ".I never disputed the number not in the labor force, so it's odd for you to insist I confirm it."
This was the way you began post #218 began...."Ah, Zero Hedge does like to sensationalize and spin. BLS has not and would not use the phrase "dropped out." Especially since the biggest reason for the drop in labor force participation has come from the elderly."

The impression is that you were piggy-backing the liar who disputed what I posted.

3. "....I never disputed the number not in the labor force,...."
Case closed.
Have a good day.