- Banned
- #281
Yours just might! It's a simple enough sentence. I think most native English speakers will get it.Can't really parse that. Care to try again?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yours just might! It's a simple enough sentence. I think most native English speakers will get it.Can't really parse that. Care to try again?
Did you used to think this way? Back when you were a "libertarian"?Platitudes and begged questions aren't any argument.
While I didn't say gubmint should dictate culture through force, we should certainly fight back against unadulterated crap like the "separation of church and state" lie, which has thrown the Bible out of State run schools as so much as a piece of literature with metaphorical morality plays.
No idea what you're talking about here.And while we're at it, are you good with regulations against pornographic material (whether you like the regulations or not) being flouted, just because said porn was uttered in a foreign language?
They can talk about it all they like. Just don't try mandating your preferences via government coercion - aka laws.Just because someone is elected to office, does that automatically mean that they have to STFU about matters of rectitude and good taste?
Which explains why so many posters here have no clue what "rate" means, or the science behind global warming.One huge problem with public schools is the lessons either prepare you to work or go to college. Germany does it different. They will segregate students so that they are in a school suitable for one or the other. Math and science courses do little good for future carpenters or auto mechanics.
Data shows you they arelegal immigrants are a net positive .. illegal immigrants that haven't been properly vetted before they sneak into the country aren't ..
should we let in 50 million more ? after all the more we let in the better it is for us eh ?Data shows you they are
Legal immigrants are a net positive?legal immigrants are a net positive .. illegal immigrants that haven't been properly vetted before they sneak into the country aren't ..
This non sequitur is not relevant.should we let in 50 million more ?
Let's not apply "tragedy of the masses" to attack the good.should we let in 50 million more ? after all the more we let in the better it is for us eh ?
We shouldn't let in 50 million completely vetted legal immigrants either.This non sequitur is not relevant.
I will pass that on to the zero peole saying we should.We shouldn't let in 50 million completely vetted legal immigrants either.
As COVID showed, big changes, like suddenly adding 50 million people, means a huge impact on the current supply chain. Which would lead to all kinds of chaos.I will pass that on to the zero peole saying we should.
What's next? Are you going to argue we shouldn't destroy the Sun?
Enjoy lala land
But 12-20 million illegal aliens is acceptable to you?I will pass that on to the zero peole saying we should.
What's next? Are you going to argue we shouldn't destroy the Sun?
Enjoy lala land
When you want to understand Relativity, the top source was Einstein.Which explains why so many posters here have no clue what "rate" means, or the science behind global warming.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Is raising your taxes, in order to pay to catch, house and deport them, acceptable to you?But 12-20 million illegal aliens is acceptable to you?
You bet.Is raising your taxes, in order to pay to catch, house and deport them, acceptable to you?
That question is very good including all immigrants as you just did.Legal immigrants are a net positive?
Does that include the 19 hijackers from 9-11?
We have both the people and the laws that determine the level of immigrants can land here. Are you truly saying you do not agree with the migration limits set by Congress?I will pass that on to the zero peole saying we should.
When you want to understand Relativity, the top source was Einstein.
As to climate, best source is Dr. Richard Lindzen who debunks what politicians teach about climate. And he points out the reports from the quoted IPCC are by management, and not the scientists.
Who could agree, when congress has either been deadlocked and unable to, or unwilling to address immigration issues since the 1990's.We have both the people and the laws that determine the level of immigrants can land here. Are you truly saying you do not agree with the migration limits set by Congress?
Explain why you do not favor legal migrants, but favor heavily illegal aliens?Read the article in the OP
Obviously you didn’t or couldn’t