Catholic School Has Demons

[BS Filter]

Pretty sick stuff at Catholic School.
Jesus was 'drag king' with 'queer desires,' claims theology professor

 

[Compost]

Professor Liew appears to have issues that have little to do with Jesus.

 

[BS Filter]

Professor Liew appears to have issues that have little to do with Jesus.

Gee, ya think!! Interested to see what the school does about it.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There is something wrong with the Catholic Church.

 

[TNHarley]

Catholicism shaped every form of christianity, single handedly, long ago.
So who are you guys to say they are wrong? Without the Catholics, there would be NO TELLING what you guys would be believing right now..

 

[Penelope]

Professor Liew explains that he believes Christ could be considered a “drag king” or cross-dresser. “If one follows the trajectory of the Wisdom/Word or Sophia/Jesus (con)figuration, what we have in John’s Jesus is not only a “king of Israel” (1:49; 12:13– 15) or “king of the Ioudaioi” (18:33, 39; 19:3, 14– 15, 19– 22), but also a drag king (6:15; 18:37; 19:12),” he claims. He later argues that “[Christ] ends up appearing as a drag-kingly bride in his passion.”

Catholic College Theology Professor Says Jesus Was ‘Drag King’ With ‘Queer Desires’

 

[Penelope]

There is something wrong with the Catholic Church.

Without it, what would you be or believe?

 

[Compost]

Professor Liew explains that he believes Christ could be considered a “drag king” or cross-dresser. “If one follows the trajectory of the Wisdom/Word or Sophia/Jesus (con)figuration, what we have in John’s Jesus is not only a “king of Israel” (1:49; 12:13– 15) or “king of the Ioudaioi” (18:33, 39; 19:3, 14– 15, 19– 22), but also a drag king (6:15; 18:37; 19:12),” he claims. He later argues that “[Christ] ends up appearing as a drag-kingly bride in his passion.”

Catholic College Theology Professor Says Jesus Was ‘Drag King’ With ‘Queer Desires’

Uh huh. Follow the trajectory.

 

[Penelope]

Professor Liew explains that he believes Christ could be considered a “drag king” or cross-dresser. “If one follows the trajectory of the Wisdom/Word or Sophia/Jesus (con)figuration, what we have in John’s Jesus is not only a “king of Israel” (1:49; 12:13– 15) or “king of the Ioudaioi” (18:33, 39; 19:3, 14– 15, 19– 22), but also a drag king (6:15; 18:37; 19:12),” he claims. He later argues that “[Christ] ends up appearing as a drag-kingly bride in his passion.”

Catholic College Theology Professor Says Jesus Was ‘Drag King’ With ‘Queer Desires’

Uh huh. Follow the trajectory.

Could be is not WAS.

 

[Compost]

Professor Liew explains that he believes Christ could be considered a “drag king” or cross-dresser. “If one follows the trajectory of the Wisdom/Word or Sophia/Jesus (con)figuration, what we have in John’s Jesus is not only a “king of Israel” (1:49; 12:13– 15) or “king of the Ioudaioi” (18:33, 39; 19:3, 14– 15, 19– 22), but also a drag king (6:15; 18:37; 19:12),” he claims. He later argues that “[Christ] ends up appearing as a drag-kingly bride in his passion.”

Catholic College Theology Professor Says Jesus Was ‘Drag King’ With ‘Queer Desires’

Uh huh. Follow the trajectory.

Could be is not WAS.

Uh huh. And those able to LIGHTEN UP are less ANNOYING.

 

[RWNJ]

Pretty sick stuff at Catholic School.
Jesus was 'drag king' with 'queer desires,' claims theology professor

There is one person who I have no doubt whatsoever will burn in Hell.

 

[HaShev]

A naked Jesus frolicking in the River Jordan with a half naked John, dunking each other under water.....but hey, they are just friends right?

I believe the Paulian Church under Paul's own fear of his own sexual orientation became anti Gay but Jesus himself? Come on, he had to be gay himself (*In my Seinfeld Voice-"not that there is anything wrong with that!")
A 33 year old man never had a girl.
A half naked John is seen in the River Jordan with a naked Jesus dunking each other under the water in folly.
Found sleeping with a young boy or boys depending if the Lazarus account is that same young boy, an incident much like the M. Jackson case.
His home town of Capernaum was liken to San Francisco whereby it was a port town where men slept with men as the NT accounts.
He is recorded to be unaturally affectionate towards men while accounting hate for woman, while also leaning on their bare bodies, warm embracing etc in the NT accounts.

Now Jesus never existed as an actual historical figure but the image they portray is of a petite effeminate man who's sexuality is definitely questionable let alone gospels surfaced mentioning the characters bisexuality, which historical figure used for his image had those accounts we might never know.

BUt Paul's homophobia is much like the church, they fear their own sexuality and mask it behind a strong self hatred.
I hate to tell you this but the Church of Jesus was based on a character that was gay.
THe secret to that statue found in the French Church with the son did not depict his children but his secret society of man- boy child lovers.
The Priest who converted out of the church when he found the scroll found information leading to the conclusion that the early church and the present church is nothing but a man-boy love cult that gets rich and powerful and gets away with it under the guise of religion.
Fact: The characters real home town is Capernaum not Nazareth which didn't exist at that era.

he taught in the town of Capernaum - John 6:17, 24, 59, Mark 1:21, 2:1 , Luke 4:31, 7:1, Matthew 4:13, 8:5, 17:24.
He lived in Capernaum, which was by the lake in the area of Zebulun and Naphtali mentioned in Luke 10:15 and John 2:12.
Jesus visits his home town of Capernaum it says in the NT.
So why would they try and make people believe he's from Nazareth instead?
Why would they hide the fact he was from Capernaum?

Answer: Because Capernaum was like our modern day San Fransisco whereby it was a trading port where men layed down with men.

There is enough evidence to conclude Jesus sexual orientation was questionable:
1) Christians admit a 33 year old man never had a girl. That is not normal social behavior for a man that age.
**2) Christians admit a half naked John is seen in the River Jordan with a naked Jesus dunking each other under the water in folly.
***3) Christians unanimously say Michael Jackson is guilty when caught sleeping with a young boy and Jesus has a similar account of being found sleeping with a young boy or boys depending if the Lazarus account is that same young boy.
This account was probably what that priest discovered when he set up that statue of Jesus with a little boy as a clue and warning.
****4) There is hidden gospel accounts of him being Bi that are just as valid as any other Gospel.
They have recently been uncovered and interpreted.
5) We know his home town of Capernaum was liken to San Francisco whereby it was a port town where men slept with men as the NT accounts.
6) The priests who claim to reflect and emulate their figure carry on this tradition even to this very day.
7) lastly he is recorded to be unaturally affectionate towards men while accounting hate for woman, while also leaning on their bare bodies, warm embracing etc in the NT accounts. Remember Satan hates woman according to Daniel and Jesus was the adversary of G0d by claiming himself higher and above G0d.

**Testimony of truth gospel which later was used for Book of Revelations had this odd commentary:
But the Son of Man came forth from Imperishability, being alien to defilement. He came to the world by the Jordan river, and immediately the Jordan turned back. And John bore witness to the descent of Jesus. For it is he who saw the power which came down upon the Jordan river; for he knew that the dominion of carnal procreation had come to an end. The Jordan river is the power of the body, that is, the senses of pleasures. The water of the Jordan is the desire for sexual intercourse. John is the archon of the womb. (is there any clearer a picture that John was his booty)

***Missing Fragments from St. Mark's Gospel According to the US Biblical scholar, Morton Smith, of Columbia University, a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery nearJerusalem in 1958, showed that the full text of St. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) includes the following passage:
"And the youth, looking upon him (Jesus), loved him and beseeched that he might remain with him. And going out of the tomb, they went into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days, Jesus instructed him and, at evening, the youth came to him wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".

To confirm this is legitimate and not forged texts: there is a letter from Clement of Alexandria to one Theodore in which this passage is quoted from what is now known as "The Secret Gospel According to Mark".

****A newly translated Gnostic gospel, entitled The Secret Book of Judas of
Kerioth, According to this seemingly
authentic early Cainite-Ophite text, translated from the Coptic by Mohammed al-Murtada and Francis Bendik, said Jesus had an active bisexual love life,
including relations
with John, Lazarus and Mary Magdelene, served an LSD-like psychedelic at
the Last Supper, faked his own crucifixion in collaboration with Judas and
Joseph of Arimathea [as in the Koranic account] and died a natural death.

But theres more verses:
"...there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and
the young men laid hold of him: And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked." (Mark 14:51-52). Was this the companion that Luke observed with Jesus inside the garden?

"...he that is courageous among the mighty shall flee away naked on that day..."(Amos 2:16----the Hebrew 'labab' translated 'flee away' here, actually means 'transported with love', and also 'ravished'). Now that certainly fits this episode of the young man fleeing away naked from Jesus outside the garden of Gethsemane.

Who was this young man if not perhaps the rich man whom "Then Jesus
beholding him, loved him..."(Mark 10:21).
Perhaps it was the rich man Lazarus, of whom "...he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus sleepeth..."(John 11:11----The Greek 'philos' translated 'friend', also means 'dear' and 'fond of').

Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his deciples, whom Jesus loved." (John 13:23----the Greek word 'anakeimai' translated 'leaning', also means 'recline' and 'outstretched'). Several passages later
again "He then lying on Jesus' breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it?"(John 13:25----the Greek word 'epipipto' translated 'lying' also means 'embrace with affection').

A very intimate portrait begins to emerge of Jesus' close physical contact with certain male friends. They are seen "...stretched out...", and "...in close embrace...", and "...lying together...", and "...kissing...", and affection-ately (and publicly) displaying their 'phileo' and 'agapao' for each other.

Conclusion: these openly gay priests and followers of Christ are merely emulating the nature of their icon who was also gay.
Once again:
*in my best Jerry Seinfeld voice* " Not that there's anything wrong with that"

 

[hobelim]

A naked Jesus frolicking in the River Jordan with a half naked John, dunking each other under water.....but hey, they are just friends right?

You are such a perverse low class degenerate that it isn't even funny.

You claiming to be the real messiah?

Now thats funny.

 

[Marion Morrison]

A naked Jesus frolicking in the River Jordan with a half naked John, dunking each other under water.....but hey, they are just friends right?

I believe the Paulian Church under Paul's own fear of his own sexual orientation became anti Gay but Jesus himself? Come on, he had to be gay himself (*In my Seinfeld Voice-"not that there is anything wrong with that!")
A 33 year old man never had a girl.
A half naked John is seen in the River Jordan with a naked Jesus dunking each other under the water in folly.
Found sleeping with a young boy or boys depending if the Lazarus account is that same young boy, an incident much like the M. Jackson case.
His home town of Capernaum was liken to San Francisco whereby it was a port town where men slept with men as the NT accounts.
He is recorded to be unaturally affectionate towards men while accounting hate for woman, while also leaning on their bare bodies, warm embracing etc in the NT accounts.

Now Jesus never existed as an actual historical figure but the image they portray is of a petite effeminate man who's sexuality is definitely questionable let alone gospels surfaced mentioning the characters bisexuality, which historical figure used for his image had those accounts we might never know.

BUt Paul's homophobia is much like the church, they fear their own sexuality and mask it behind a strong self hatred.
I hate to tell you this but the Church of Jesus was based on a character that was gay.
THe secret to that statue found in the French Church with the son did not depict his children but his secret society of man- boy child lovers.
The Priest who converted out of the church when he found the scroll found information leading to the conclusion that the early church and the present church is nothing but a man-boy love cult that gets rich and powerful and gets away with it under the guise of religion.
Fact: The characters real home town is Capernaum not Nazareth which didn't exist at that era.

he taught in the town of Capernaum - John 6:17, 24, 59, Mark 1:21, 2:1 , Luke 4:31, 7:1, Matthew 4:13, 8:5, 17:24.
He lived in Capernaum, which was by the lake in the area of Zebulun and Naphtali mentioned in Luke 10:15 and John 2:12.
Jesus visits his home town of Capernaum it says in the NT.
So why would they try and make people believe he's from Nazareth instead?
Why would they hide the fact he was from Capernaum?

Answer: Because Capernaum was like our modern day San Fransisco whereby it was a trading port where men layed down with men.

There is enough evidence to conclude Jesus sexual orientation was questionable:
1) Christians admit a 33 year old man never had a girl. That is not normal social behavior for a man that age.
**2) Christians admit a half naked John is seen in the River Jordan with a naked Jesus dunking each other under the water in folly.
***3) Christians unanimously say Michael Jackson is guilty when caught sleeping with a young boy and Jesus has a similar account of being found sleeping with a young boy or boys depending if the Lazarus account is that same young boy.
This account was probably what that priest discovered when he set up that statue of Jesus with a little boy as a clue and warning.
****4) There is hidden gospel accounts of him being Bi that are just as valid as any other Gospel.
They have recently been uncovered and interpreted.
5) We know his home town of Capernaum was liken to San Francisco whereby it was a port town where men slept with men as the NT accounts.
6) The priests who claim to reflect and emulate their figure carry on this tradition even to this very day.
7) lastly he is recorded to be unaturally affectionate towards men while accounting hate for woman, while also leaning on their bare bodies, warm embracing etc in the NT accounts. Remember Satan hates woman according to Daniel and Jesus was the adversary of G0d by claiming himself higher and above G0d.

**Testimony of truth gospel which later was used for Book of Revelations had this odd commentary:
But the Son of Man came forth from Imperishability, being alien to defilement. He came to the world by the Jordan river, and immediately the Jordan turned back. And John bore witness to the descent of Jesus. For it is he who saw the power which came down upon the Jordan river; for he knew that the dominion of carnal procreation had come to an end. The Jordan river is the power of the body, that is, the senses of pleasures. The water of the Jordan is the desire for sexual intercourse. John is the archon of the womb. (is there any clearer a picture that John was his booty)

***Missing Fragments from St. Mark's Gospel According to the US Biblical scholar, Morton Smith, of Columbia University, a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery nearJerusalem in 1958, showed that the full text of St. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) includes the following passage:
"And the youth, looking upon him (Jesus), loved him and beseeched that he might remain with him. And going out of the tomb, they went into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days, Jesus instructed him and, at evening, the youth came to him wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".

To confirm this is legitimate and not forged texts: there is a letter from Clement of Alexandria to one Theodore in which this passage is quoted from what is now known as "The Secret Gospel According to Mark".

****A newly translated Gnostic gospel, entitled The Secret Book of Judas of
Kerioth, According to this seemingly
authentic early Cainite-Ophite text, translated from the Coptic by Mohammed al-Murtada and Francis Bendik, said Jesus had an active bisexual love life,
including relations
with John, Lazarus and Mary Magdelene, served an LSD-like psychedelic at
the Last Supper, faked his own crucifixion in collaboration with Judas and
Joseph of Arimathea [as in the Koranic account] and died a natural death.

But theres more verses:
"...there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and
the young men laid hold of him: And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked." (Mark 14:51-52). Was this the companion that Luke observed with Jesus inside the garden?

"...he that is courageous among the mighty shall flee away naked on that day..."(Amos 2:16----the Hebrew 'labab' translated 'flee away' here, actually means 'transported with love', and also 'ravished'). Now that certainly fits this episode of the young man fleeing away naked from Jesus outside the garden of Gethsemane.

Who was this young man if not perhaps the rich man whom "Then Jesus
beholding him, loved him..."(Mark 10:21).
Perhaps it was the rich man Lazarus, of whom "...he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus sleepeth..."(John 11:11----The Greek 'philos' translated 'friend', also means 'dear' and 'fond of').

Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his deciples, whom Jesus loved." (John 13:23----the Greek word 'anakeimai' translated 'leaning', also means 'recline' and 'outstretched'). Several passages later
again "He then lying on Jesus' breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it?"(John 13:25----the Greek word 'epipipto' translated 'lying' also means 'embrace with affection').

A very intimate portrait begins to emerge of Jesus' close physical contact with certain male friends. They are seen "...stretched out...", and "...in close embrace...", and "...lying together...", and "...kissing...", and affection-ately (and publicly) displaying their 'phileo' and 'agapao' for each other.

Conclusion: these openly gay priests and followers of Christ are merely emulating the nature of their icon who was also gay.
Once again:
*in my best Jerry Seinfeld voice* " Not that there's anything wrong with that"

TL;DR

 

[Windparadox]

`
He should stop reading that cultish, evangelical crap.
`

 

[ding]

A naked Jesus frolicking in the River Jordan with a half naked John, dunking each other under water.....but hey, they are just friends right?

You are such a perverse low class degenerate that it isn't even funny.

You claiming to be the real messiah?

Now thats funny.

The ironic thing is that what he does is no different than what you do. It is just a different degree.

 

[hobelim]

A naked Jesus frolicking in the River Jordan with a half naked John, dunking each other under water.....but hey, they are just friends right?

You are such a perverse low class degenerate that it isn't even funny.

You claiming to be the real messiah?

Now thats funny.

The ironic thing is that what he does is no different than what you do. It is just a different degree.

Damn ding are you really that confused ?

Would you like for me to point out the differences to you?

 

[ding]

A naked Jesus frolicking in the River Jordan with a half naked John, dunking each other under water.....but hey, they are just friends right?

You are such a perverse low class degenerate that it isn't even funny.

You claiming to be the real messiah?

Now thats funny.

The ironic thing is that what he does is no different than what you do. It is just a different degree.

Damn ding are you really that confused ?

Would you like for me to point out the differences to you?

Please do rationalize why you believe you are different.

 

[Taz]

Would you like for me to point out the differences to you?

Please do rationalize why you believe you are different.

You're both the same, delusional.

 

[Penelope]

Professor Liew explains that he believes Christ could be considered a “drag king” or cross-dresser. “If one follows the trajectory of the Wisdom/Word or Sophia/Jesus (con)figuration, what we have in John’s Jesus is not only a “king of Israel” (1:49; 12:13– 15) or “king of the Ioudaioi” (18:33, 39; 19:3, 14– 15, 19– 22), but also a drag king (6:15; 18:37; 19:12),” he claims. He later argues that “[Christ] ends up appearing as a drag-kingly bride in his passion.”

Catholic College Theology Professor Says Jesus Was ‘Drag King’ With ‘Queer Desires’

Uh huh. Follow the trajectory.

Could be is not WAS.

Uh huh. And those able to LIGHTEN UP are less ANNOYING.

Words have meaning.