Catherine Herridge .. notes that long after filing whistleblower complaint that failed to disclose prior contacts with the staff of Adam Schiff – probably a matter of lying in a sworn statement, and therefore criminal conduct – the still unnamed (in the MSM but widely believed to be Eric Ciaramella)
...
the anonymous whistleblower reached out to the intelligence community watchdog on October 8 to clarify the nature of his or her contact with Democratic majority staff of the House Intelligence Committee before the complaint was filed.
The whistleblower acknowledged reaching out to the committee, but claimed that nothing substantial was discussed
...
This is a CYA move made after those contacts were discovered
...
How does a person get procedural advice without “disclosing” the complaint to the person giving the procedural advice?
This evidence of criminal conduct in failing to accurately answer specific questions on the complaint form requires that the so-called “whistleblower” testify before the House Judiciary Committee about the open impeachment hearings. It also should be fodder for the DOJ investigation of the leaker-called-a-whistleblower, including subpoenas to Schiff’s staffer(s) who dealt with him so as to definitively identify him under penalty of law.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
------------
Catherine Herridge, now at CBS, devastates ‘Whistleblower’s’ legitimacy
She's one of the exceedingly few "journalists" left, and is excellent. I'm very surprised commie seeBS would hire someone of her caliber.
...
the anonymous whistleblower reached out to the intelligence community watchdog on October 8 to clarify the nature of his or her contact with Democratic majority staff of the House Intelligence Committee before the complaint was filed.
The whistleblower acknowledged reaching out to the committee, but claimed that nothing substantial was discussed
...
This is a CYA move made after those contacts were discovered
...
How does a person get procedural advice without “disclosing” the complaint to the person giving the procedural advice?
This evidence of criminal conduct in failing to accurately answer specific questions on the complaint form requires that the so-called “whistleblower” testify before the House Judiciary Committee about the open impeachment hearings. It also should be fodder for the DOJ investigation of the leaker-called-a-whistleblower, including subpoenas to Schiff’s staffer(s) who dealt with him so as to definitively identify him under penalty of law.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
------------
Catherine Herridge, now at CBS, devastates ‘Whistleblower’s’ legitimacy
She's one of the exceedingly few "journalists" left, and is excellent. I'm very surprised commie seeBS would hire someone of her caliber.
