Carly Fiorona is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary Clinton

[imawhosure]

Well, things always change, but remember Obama vs Hillary? Well, now look at this Poll Sanders surges ahead of Clinton in New Hampshire TheHill

I can plainly see that Oreo is an establishment republican, and neither he nor those with over 20,000 posts can understand why Hillary and Bush are in deep trouble. Americans are extremely pissed; at record numbers in fact, and these people believe that they can "guide" the narrative in the usual manner making everything fine and dandy.

Just for a reality check.........specifically to candy............Bush is useless. His base despises him almost as much as they despise Obama, because he is another politician who whines and moans about your party, but will go along with the program as long as HIS guys are in charge.

That being said, he has a higher probability of getting the GOP nod than Hillary. Why? Because there are so many GOP candidates, it has a high probability of going to go to convention. Unless the conservatives are highly intelligent, the establishment will try and cut a deal to get him or Kascich the nomination.

Not so on the democratic side. There is only 2, or possibly 3 possible winners there, and the democrats do not trust Clinton. It will be much easier for the democrats to coalesce around 1 adversary, and knock Clinton out of the box.

Just as the GOP has Trump leading, it is because very few people besides the Washington elites want Bush. It is also why Bernie is drawing tremendous crowds; because the democrats do not really want Clinton. The mainstream posters and pundits do not really understand it, because they do NOT believe that the country will convert its anger into throwing the establishment out.

If I was you people, I would start to reconsider-)

No one is going to elect a 3rd Bush. The difference in your analogy is that Hillary Clinton will be the nominee of the Democrat Party because she was kicked to the curb by party faithfuls with Obama--and she is a WOMAN. They want the title to the first woman POTUS and Bernie Sanders is not going to keep them away from that title.

If you remember correctly it was Hillary Clinton that had a huge lead at this time during the 2008 election cycle and it was Obama that caught up to her and then surpassed her in the later stages. So Bernie Sanders getting a little pop this early means nothing.

Donald Trump has lost support since the debate. CNBC has him down 10 points, another 17 points. He's not going to get within 200 miles of the White House. They're already making fun of him.

Also, what person that you know that claims to be a conservative, donates to Hillary Clinton's senate campaign fund, and just prior to Trump announcing he gets a call from Bill Clinton. Now who's playing who?

Here is Carly Fiorina calling Trump out on this:

I am not a Trump supporter at all. I would vote far faster for Fiarina than Trump. I am not here to trash Carly at all, just disagree with you on Hilly having her nomination locked. It is obvious to me you will not believe it when I tell you that Hilly is in more than minor trouble. The democratic hierarchy knows this, but what would you expect them to say? "Our candidate is looking sickly, but we are going to nominate her anyway?" Of course not! Even the democratic zillion post posters on here are showing false bravado; and I am positive most of these shills know their heroes position is tenuous.

No, what is happening is they are confidently going by the numbers that they post everywhere. What I keep telling everyone about those numbers is.............people have left the republican party to become independent because of the republicans NOT representing them. So when the democrat tells you that MOST independents are moderate so will vote with them, just smile and say, "yeah sure." Even Romney carried a much larger % of the independents than Obama in 2012, just because of this reason. A conservative will carry more of them than Romney did because they are former Reagan republicans, and much larger base will appear to boot.

Just a question to you. I have been told that if Trump were to win the Whitehouse, he would be the 1st President to supply us with a 1st Lady who was in porn. Is this true? If it is, he certainly won't win the republican nomination, and will get more democratic votes than republican votes if he runs 3rd party, lol.

I have been told by 5 or 6 people this is fact, but a lot of her pictures have been expunged from the internet, but a lot are still around. Since I just came home from work, I have not had the time to look.

 

[nuhuh]

Having seen a Carly Fiorina campaign before I can assure you the upcoming train wreck will be ugly. She has a beautiful speech making ability but as we have seen with others substance is far more important than a good sound byte. In her voting history since age 21, Carly Fiorina failed to vote in 75% of the elections she could have. She has missed primary and general election votes and even failed to vote in 2006, when she could have cast a negative vote for Dianne Feinstein. When her tenure at Hewlett Packard comes up in future debates you can be sure she won't look so attractive without clothes. There's a reason Californian's soundly rejected her and you're about to find out why on your own.

 

[oreo]

Having seen a Carly Fiorina campaign before I can assure you the upcoming train wreck will be ugly. She has a beautiful speech making ability but as we have seen with others substance is far more important than a good sound byte. In her voting life since age 21, Carly Fiorina failed to vote in 75% of the elections she could have. She has missed primary and general election votes and even failed to vote in 2006, when she could have cast a negative vote for Dianne Feinstein. When her tenure at Hewlett Packard comes up in future debates you can be sure she won't look so attractive without clothes. There's a reason Californian's soundly rejected her and you're about to find out why on your own.

We I guess she can't be accused of voting for the wrong person--LOL

 

[bravoactual]

FYI

Hillary is Defeating herself

I am taking much heat from the Democratic Central Committee Marin (D.C.C.M.) for NOT supporting Hilary. I'm a alternate to that Committee and a Delegate to California Democratic Convention held in Anaheim back in June.

I do not believe in or support any form of "Inevitable Candidate".

I also know that the Republican Circle Jerk is killing the party and the chances of the RePugs winning in 2016 are slim, nill and none.

Your party used to stand for something, now it stands for whatever Fox News says it does.

 

[bravoactual]

FYI

Hillary is Defeating herself

Agreed. Hilary proved to a mediocre candidate in 2008. Then Senator Obama trounced then Senator Clinton in at least 12-Primaries. Ms. Clinton is very much a machine pol. I despise machine pols.

 

[rightwinger]

Carley could not even beat Barbara Boxer

How is she going to defeat Hillary?

 

[whitehall]

Hillary is so vulnerable that she may not even be able to run by the time the election rolls around. Right now even Bernie Sanders out polls her.

 

[oreo]

FYI

Hillary is Defeating herself

I am taking much heat from the Democratic Central Committee Marin (D.C.C.M.) for NOT supporting Hilary. I'm a alternate to that Committee and a Delegate to California Democratic Convention held in Anaheim back in June.

I do not believe in or support any form of "Inevitable Candidate".

I also know that the Republican Circle Jerk is killing the party and the chances of the RePugs winning in 2016 are slim, nill and none.

Your party used to stand for something, now it stands for whatever Fox News says it does.

Clearly there are 10 GOP candidates that have hung the no exception noose to abortion around their necks, and in no way could possibly win in the general election. They would get slaughtered. 91% of this nation believe in giving exceptions on abortion for the life of the mother, rape & incest. These 10 candidates still haven't figured out that women are the majority voters in this country today. Women feel that their lives do matter. They are not going to tolerate being treated like second class citizens. Their opinions and decisions are to be respected on issues that are directly related to them, and they won't vote for males who continually insult their integrity.

The no-goers out of the gate are:
1. Scott Walker
2. Mike Huckabee
3. Rick Perry
4. Ted Cruz
5. Rand Paul
6. Bobby Jindal
7. Ben Carson--who is flipping and flopping
8. Marco Rubio--who did give exceptions but got roped a doped into not giving any--(or he's all over the map depending on what audience he's in front of.)
9. Rick Santorum

They're done! I have no problems at all of early elimination of candidates. Keeping them in this race, only hurts other Republicans chances. These Knuckle Dragging Neanderthals are killing the Republican Party.

Take five minutes out to watch Carly Fiorina in this recent CBS interview, regarding Cinton's emails, abortion, planned parenthood, immigration and Trump. She is the only one that is capable of defeating Hillary Clinton.

Carly Fiorina slams Hillary Clinton Donald Trump - Videos - CBS News

 

[bravoactual]

Republicans are still hung up on the hope of finding another Ronald Reagan, you know the b-actor who believed the "Chimp got the better lines."

The wonder who spent his war years making training movies.

The man raised the debt ceiling and increased the National Debt.

The dofus who funded Al_Qeada when it was fighting the Soviet Union.

The fool who sent Donald Rumsfeld to shake hands with Saddam.

The Epislon Plus Semi-Moron who said Catsup was a vegetable.

That same Ronald Reagan who would not be allowed in today's Republican Party for trying to limit Nuclear Arms.

The current crop of circle jerks do not stand a dried up turd's chance of winning in November 2016.

The Republican Party used to stand for something, now it stands for what Fox News tell's it to stand for.