wamose
Diamond Member
This is the result you get when all the people you are polling are socialist-communist Democrats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still not hearing a name. Don't have any suggestions, do you?Meanwhile, you haven't given me any alternatives.Given the current choices, I'll vote Trump.No, not anyone. Voting for a "free shit for illegals" Democrat would not improve the situation, and only make it worse.
As long as you continue to vote for those who do nothing that is what you are going to get until someone gets in promising to do the opposite of what you want.
Sure, and the problem will get bigger and bigger and bigger until someone comes along to make them legal.
There are always alternatives. The alternatives start long before the elections. If Trump's numbers were in the gutter alternatives would start up.
But Trump gives a speech, does nothing else and people cheer.
Meanwhile, you haven't given me any alternatives.Given the current choices, I'll vote Trump.No, not anyone. Voting for a "free shit for illegals" Democrat would not improve the situation, and only make it worse.
As long as you continue to vote for those who do nothing that is what you are going to get until someone gets in promising to do the opposite of what you want.
Sure, and the problem will get bigger and bigger and bigger until someone comes along to make them legal.
There are always alternatives. The alternatives start long before the elections. If Trump's numbers were in the gutter alternatives would start up.
But Trump gives a speech, does nothing else and people cheer.
When a few billionaires control most things, that’s not surprising.
It's hard to argue this one way or another as Capitalism isn't really practiced anywhere.
Still not hearing a name. Don't have any suggestions, do you?Meanwhile, you haven't given me any alternatives.Given the current choices, I'll vote Trump.As long as you continue to vote for those who do nothing that is what you are going to get until someone gets in promising to do the opposite of what you want.
Sure, and the problem will get bigger and bigger and bigger until someone comes along to make them legal.
There are always alternatives. The alternatives start long before the elections. If Trump's numbers were in the gutter alternatives would start up.
But Trump gives a speech, does nothing else and people cheer.
It's hard to argue this one way or another as Capitalism isn't really practiced anywhere.
.Meanwhile, you haven't given me any alternatives.Given the current choices, I'll vote Trump.As long as you continue to vote for those who do nothing that is what you are going to get until someone gets in promising to do the opposite of what you want.
Sure, and the problem will get bigger and bigger and bigger until someone comes along to make them legal.
There are always alternatives. The alternatives start long before the elections. If Trump's numbers were in the gutter alternatives would start up.
But Trump gives a speech, does nothing else and people cheer.
..... and meanwhile...... YOU have not given us any alternatives.
"there are always alternatives"... no there are not.
Honestly, if the Democrats had run someone like James Trafficant (yes he's dead now, but someone like him)... I would have very much considered voting Democrat.
Instead they have been running the garbage candidates like Warren (There is always more money!) and a 1,000 year old mummified communist that got kicked out of his own commune, and is now a millionaire that runs around saying other millionaires are the reason we are not all millionaires.
You have an entire other political party to find an alternative to Trump. Shut up and do it, or stop talking about it.
It's hard to argue this one way or another as Capitalism isn't really practiced anywhere.
What are you smoking.
I was reading about a guy in China, that under communism, was starving in one of their farming camps. After liberalization, he started getting corrugated iron sheets from landfills, and selling them to the poor people as roofing material. He now runs a billion dollar roofing company, and is a billionaire in China.
Do you call that socialist or capitalist? If that isn't capitalist, then I don't know what you would call it.
Really? If you can’t see the obvious harm in this, I can’t help you.When a few billionaires control most things, that’s not surprising.
So what? What does that matter to anything?
.Meanwhile, you haven't given me any alternatives.Given the current choices, I'll vote Trump.
Sure, and the problem will get bigger and bigger and bigger until someone comes along to make them legal.
There are always alternatives. The alternatives start long before the elections. If Trump's numbers were in the gutter alternatives would start up.
But Trump gives a speech, does nothing else and people cheer.
..... and meanwhile...... YOU have not given us any alternatives.
"there are always alternatives"... no there are not.
Honestly, if the Democrats had run someone like James Trafficant (yes he's dead now, but someone like him)... I would have very much considered voting Democrat.
Interesting....someone convicted for corruption. I see a pattern here.
Instead they have been running the garbage candidates like Warren (There is always more money!) and a 1,000 year old mummified communist that got kicked out of his own commune, and is now a millionaire that runs around saying other millionaires are the reason we are not all millionaires.
You have an entire other political party to find an alternative to Trump. Shut up and do it, or stop talking about it.
There is more to the world than (R) and (D). I feel sorry for those unable to see this.
Really? If you can’t see the obvious harm in this, I can’t help you.When a few billionaires control most things, that’s not surprising.
So what? What does that matter to anything?
It's hard to argue this one way or another as Capitalism isn't really practiced anywhere.
What are you smoking.
I was reading about a guy in China, that under communism, was starving in one of their farming camps. After liberalization, he started getting corrugated iron sheets from landfills, and selling them to the poor people as roofing material. He now runs a billion dollar roofing company, and is a billionaire in China.
Do you call that socialist or capitalist? If that isn't capitalist, then I don't know what you would call it.
You read.......lol. I read that Trump bailed out farmers. Where do we find this in Capitalism?
Why do you want transnational billionaires controlling your government and mainstream media? Think about it.Really? If you can’t see the obvious harm in this, I can’t help you.When a few billionaires control most things, that’s not surprising.
So what? What does that matter to anything?
Venezuela has very few billionaires, and people are starving and dying.
China had very few wealthy people prior to the 1980s, and literally hundreds of thousands were living on less than a dollar a day.
Today China has tons of wealthy people, and the standard of living across the entire country is rising.
Your position is that it's better off for everyone to be poorer as long as the rich are not richer... is obviously a ideology that harms people. If you can't see that, then no one anywhere can help you.
It's hard to argue this one way or another as Capitalism isn't really practiced anywhere.
What are you smoking.
I was reading about a guy in China, that under communism, was starving in one of their farming camps. After liberalization, he started getting corrugated iron sheets from landfills, and selling them to the poor people as roofing material. He now runs a billion dollar roofing company, and is a billionaire in China.
Do you call that socialist or capitalist? If that isn't capitalist, then I don't know what you would call it.
You read.......lol. I read that Trump bailed out farmers. Where do we find this in Capitalism?
We don't.... and I never suggested that Trump was an ideologue, nor a champion of capitalist ideals. One of the primary reason I did not vote for Trump in 2016, is because I thought for sure he'd be pushing government run health care, and more control over the market.
So.... you fail. I don't support any bailouts anywhere. The conservatives didn't support bank bailouts in 2009 either.
Conservative Republicans offer bailout alternative
In fact, the Tea Party which was generally a conservative movement, was a backlash against the bailouts.
Capitalism does not involve government either paying for, or bailout out, business. If that happens, it isn't capitalism.
Crony capitalism is more applicable.It's hard to argue this one way or another as Capitalism isn't really practiced anywhere.
What are you smoking.
I was reading about a guy in China, that under communism, was starving in one of their farming camps. After liberalization, he started getting corrugated iron sheets from landfills, and selling them to the poor people as roofing material. He now runs a billion dollar roofing company, and is a billionaire in China.
Do you call that socialist or capitalist? If that isn't capitalist, then I don't know what you would call it.
You read.......lol. I read that Trump bailed out farmers. Where do we find this in Capitalism?
We don't.... and I never suggested that Trump was an ideologue, nor a champion of capitalist ideals. One of the primary reason I did not vote for Trump in 2016, is because I thought for sure he'd be pushing government run health care, and more control over the market.
So.... you fail. I don't support any bailouts anywhere. The conservatives didn't support bank bailouts in 2009 either.
Conservative Republicans offer bailout alternative
In fact, the Tea Party which was generally a conservative movement, was a backlash against the bailouts.
Capitalism does not involve government either paying for, or bailout out, business. If that happens, it isn't capitalism.
As I've noted many times, we are not a nation that runs on Capitalism.
Crony capitalism is more applicable.It's hard to argue this one way or another as Capitalism isn't really practiced anywhere.
What are you smoking.
I was reading about a guy in China, that under communism, was starving in one of their farming camps. After liberalization, he started getting corrugated iron sheets from landfills, and selling them to the poor people as roofing material. He now runs a billion dollar roofing company, and is a billionaire in China.
Do you call that socialist or capitalist? If that isn't capitalist, then I don't know what you would call it.
You read.......lol. I read that Trump bailed out farmers. Where do we find this in Capitalism?
We don't.... and I never suggested that Trump was an ideologue, nor a champion of capitalist ideals. One of the primary reason I did not vote for Trump in 2016, is because I thought for sure he'd be pushing government run health care, and more control over the market.
So.... you fail. I don't support any bailouts anywhere. The conservatives didn't support bank bailouts in 2009 either.
Conservative Republicans offer bailout alternative
In fact, the Tea Party which was generally a conservative movement, was a backlash against the bailouts.
Capitalism does not involve government either paying for, or bailout out, business. If that happens, it isn't capitalism.
As I've noted many times, we are not a nation that runs on Capitalism.