Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What is Democratic Socialism? - Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)Socialism is the State ownership...under Socialism you have even MORE CONCENRATED money and political power, since only the State owns things.
How much "ownership" does that share provide in a one-share-one vote system compared to a one-person one-vote democracy?Actually in a capitalist society, we have public ownership....anyone can by a share of any publicly traded company. Try again.
"We want every fucking thing you do to be controlled by majority rule."What is Democratic Socialism? - Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
"Capitalism is a system designed by the owning class to exploit the rest of us for their own profit.
"We must replace it with democratic socialism, a system where ordinary people have a real voice in our workplaces, neighborhoods, and society."
How much "ownership" does that share provide in a one-share-one vote system
It's obvious you haven't a clue about what socialism is, and you have no interest in learning.There is only one form of socialism...you can paint it up, and give it different adjectives in front of it to try and re-package it and sell it...but it is what it is
yeah socialist always say some fun stuff but the. take officeWhat is Democratic Socialism? - Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
"Capitalism is a system designed by the owning class to exploit the rest of us for their own profit.
"We must replace it with democratic socialism, a system where ordinary people have a real voice in our workplaces, neighborhoods, and society."
one share buys you one vote…just like in a democracatic govt, one citizen (with age requirements) gets one vote.How much "ownership" does that share provide in a one-share-one vote system compared to a one-person one-vote democracy?
"CBO Chart, U.S. Holdings of Family Wealth 1989 to 2013. The top 10% of families held 76% of the wealth in 2013, while the bottom 50% of families held 1%. Inequality increased from 1989 to 2013."
Wealth inequality in the United States - Wikipedia
I read what Marx wrote…and of course seen it throughout historyIt's obvious you haven't a clue about what socialism is, and you have no interest in learning.
Different types of socialism - Economics Help
Private wealth which has the power to control government has the power to force you to do what you don't want to do.The power to employ force against those who won't do what you want them to do. Governments have this power, private wealth does not.
Then you won't be the owner much longer.My workers don't get to vote on my ownership.
Before or after German capitalists got their asses kicked by Stalin's communists?When we compare East Germany to West Germany, even a moron like you can see what works best.
That's your fantasy world.It's obvious you haven't a clue about what socialism is, and you have no interest in learning.
Different types of socialism - Economics Help
Private wealth which has the power to control government has the power to force you to do what you don't want to do.
Ask Steven Donziger if you're still confused:
Lawyer Who Won $9.5 Billion Judgment Against Chevron Reports to Prison
Then you won't be the owner much longer.
Before or after German capitalists got their asses kicked by Stalin's communists?
Even a semi-literate bean-counter like you should know this answer.
So you are admitting that democracy can't work.Private wealth which has the power to control government has the power to force you to do what you don't want to do.
Ask Steven Donziger if you're still confused:
Lawyer Who Won $9.5 Billion Judgment Against Chevron Reports to Prison
Yes. We need a constitutional "wall of separation" between economic and state power. The more we combine them, the worse things get.Private wealth which has the power to control government has the power to force you to do what you don't want to do.
Majority rule works well for a homogenous society which of course does not exist in the US, dissimilar cultures, religions, races, education, and economic status. I think we need leaders less concerned with winning over the majority and more concerned with solving the nations problems even thou it is not what the majority might want.Your previous definition was sufficient.
I don't want government to "run" society. Nor the economy. What you're advocating is totalitarian government. One where every goddamned thing is subject to your precious majority rule.
Majority rule never works well.Majority rule works well for a homogenous society which of course does not exist in the US, dissimilar cultures, religions, races, education, and economic status. I think we need leaders less concerned with winning over the majority and more concerned with solving the nations problems even thou it is not what the majority might want.
The founders believe those that followed them would be reasonable people willing to work together for the good of the nation. That does not exist today.
Do you have a response?a-ching!
Do you have a quota?
Indeed, I do. My response is mockery. If you're going to use the board to spread your propaganda - I'm going to point out just how stupid it is.Do you have a response?
