Candace Owens VS The Tolerant Left

[Ame®icano]

Candace Owens is very good at telling white people how shiftless the other Negroes are.

You're just jealous that she's speaks better English than you are.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I hope this woman runs for President some day. She will get my vote.

She's the full package.

She's a boot licking Tom.

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Because there is no answer the moron would accept. He is just another America hating leftist.

You mean there was no answer the idiot could give, because it wasn't one.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

She should have called it what it is, MAWA.

You seem upset. Are you worried you'll get kicked off the porch and have to survive without Democrats proping you up?

View attachment 288314

Is that what you see in the morror?

Sorry AssMAWAclown, you've got the wrong man. Give me the era that she couldn't.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I hope this woman runs for President some day. She will get my vote.

She's the full package.

She's a boot licking Tom.

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Why she could or could not answer the question in the video is irrelevant. You consider her a bootlicker because she chose a political viewpoint that you don't agree with, not because of her behavior in a video.

You would have called her a bootlicker anyway with or without the video. Tell me I'm wrong.

She said she was going to answer the question, so it is relevant as hell. With that said why couldn't she answer the question?

 

[Nostra]

She's the full package.

She's a boot licking Tom.

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Because there is no answer the moron would accept. He is just another America hating leftist.

You mean there was no answer the idiot could give, because it wasn't one.

Nope. Not what I mean, but your lies are duly noted.

 

[MAGAman]

Sorry AssMAWAclown, you've got the wrong man. Give me the era that she couldn't.

You're just angry because your ObamaPhone is White.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

She's the full package.

She's a boot licking Tom.

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Why she could or could not answer the question in the video is irrelevant. You consider her a bootlicker because she chose a political viewpoint that you don't agree with, not because of her behavior in a video.

You would have called her a bootlicker anyway with or without the video. Tell me I'm wrong.

She said she was going to answer the question, so it is relevant as hell. With that said why couldn't she answer the question?

It's not relevant at all for three reasons: 1) That video is not the one this thread is about. Everyone was commenting on the video that this discussion IS about and then you jumped in - addressing no one in particular and completely off topic - to ask a question about a totally unrelated video.

2) It is not why you consider her a bootlicker and in fact I'm betting you thought so before either of these videos.

3) You called her a "bootlicking Tom" in response to MAGAman's comment that she was the "full package", not because of the video you linked. The video you linked has nothing to do with this discussion.

By the way, I've seen the video and in fact I talked about it in another thread recently and I'll tell you what I told them: She couldn't answer because the dipshit that asked her the question wouldn't stop interrupting her.
That's not how you properly conduct a debate or discussion. When he asked her the question he should have shut the fuck up and let her answer. Every time she tried to speak he would interrupt her again when she started saying something he didn't like with "WHICH PERIOD WAS GREAT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REPLICATE! WHICH ERA WAS IT!"

If she's going to flounder, let her do it on her own. Shouting your opponent down is a cheap tactic meant to make your opponent look like they're floundering. This TI person is a fucking idiot.

 

[JimBowie1958]

 

[Superbadbrutha]

She's a boot licking Tom.

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Because there is no answer the moron would accept. He is just another America hating leftist.

You mean there was no answer the idiot could give, because it wasn't one.

Nope. Not what I mean, but your lies are duly noted.

What era are you Trump Humpers talking about?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Sorry AssMAWAclown, you've got the wrong man. Give me the era that she couldn't.

You're just angry because your ObamaPhone is White.

You're just and idiot MAWA ass clown.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

She's a boot licking Tom.

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Why she could or could not answer the question in the video is irrelevant. You consider her a bootlicker because she chose a political viewpoint that you don't agree with, not because of her behavior in a video.

You would have called her a bootlicker anyway with or without the video. Tell me I'm wrong.

She said she was going to answer the question, so it is relevant as hell. With that said why couldn't she answer the question?

It's not relevant at all for three reasons: 1) That video is not the one this thread is about. Everyone was commenting on the video that this discussion IS about and then you jumped in - addressing no one in particular and completely off topic - to ask a question about a totally unrelated video.

2) It is not why you consider her a bootlicker and in fact I'm betting you thought so before either of these videos.

3) You called her a "bootlicking Tom" in response to MAGAman's comment that she was the "full package", not because of the video you linked. The video you linked has nothing to do with this discussion.

By the way, I've seen the video and in fact I talked about it in another thread recently and I'll tell you what I told them: She couldn't answer because the dipshit that asked her the question wouldn't stop interrupting her.
That's not how you properly conduct a debate or discussion. When he asked her the question he should have shut the fuck up and let her answer. Every time she tried to speak he would interrupt her again when she started saying something he didn't like with "WHICH PERIOD WAS GREAT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REPLICATE! WHICH ERA WAS IT!"

If she's going to flounder, let her do it on her own. Shouting your opponent down is a cheap tactic meant to make your opponent look like they're floundering. This TI person is a fucking idiot.

What era is she talking about?

 

[Nostra]

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Because there is no answer the moron would accept. He is just another America hating leftist.

You mean there was no answer the idiot could give, because it wasn't one.

Nope. Not what I mean, but your lies are duly noted.

What era are you Trump Humpers talking about?

More of your obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.....

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Because there is no answer the moron would accept. He is just another America hating leftist.

You mean there was no answer the idiot could give, because it wasn't one.

Nope. Not what I mean, but your lies are duly noted.

What era are you Trump Humpers talking about?

More of your obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.....

What era Trump Humper?

 

[Nostra]

Because there is no answer the moron would accept. He is just another America hating leftist.

You mean there was no answer the idiot could give, because it wasn't one.

Nope. Not what I mean, but your lies are duly noted.

What era are you Trump Humpers talking about?

More of your obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.....

What era Trump Humper?

You really should ask a professional about that obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.......

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Looking at it from your perspective of choosing-a-political-value system/party = bootlicking, whatever she chooses she will be licking somebody's boots. Therefore, she may as well lick the boots of those she agrees with. Why would she lick the boots of those she disagrees with?

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Why she could or could not answer the question in the video is irrelevant. You consider her a bootlicker because she chose a political viewpoint that you don't agree with, not because of her behavior in a video.

You would have called her a bootlicker anyway with or without the video. Tell me I'm wrong.

She said she was going to answer the question, so it is relevant as hell. With that said why couldn't she answer the question?

It's not relevant at all for three reasons: 1) That video is not the one this thread is about. Everyone was commenting on the video that this discussion IS about and then you jumped in - addressing no one in particular and completely off topic - to ask a question about a totally unrelated video.

2) It is not why you consider her a bootlicker and in fact I'm betting you thought so before either of these videos.

3) You called her a "bootlicking Tom" in response to MAGAman's comment that she was the "full package", not because of the video you linked. The video you linked has nothing to do with this discussion.

By the way, I've seen the video and in fact I talked about it in another thread recently and I'll tell you what I told them: She couldn't answer because the dipshit that asked her the question wouldn't stop interrupting her.
That's not how you properly conduct a debate or discussion. When he asked her the question he should have shut the fuck up and let her answer. Every time she tried to speak he would interrupt her again when she started saying something he didn't like with "WHICH PERIOD WAS GREAT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REPLICATE! WHICH ERA WAS IT!"

If she's going to flounder, let her do it on her own. Shouting your opponent down is a cheap tactic meant to make your opponent look like they're floundering. This TI person is a fucking idiot.

What era is she talking about?

Just can't let it go, huh? Alright, I will answer the question for you that TI wouldn't let Owens answer, even though he's the one who asked her.

The period they're referring to is the first half of the twentieth century, especially the period right after WWII. It was during this time that the U.S. was at its height in prosperity. We were also trailblazers and innovators in just about every domain: medical; military; technology; industrial; engineering; science; manufacturing, etc., etc.

You can choose to think that, like this TI idiot and many others, that America was never great because of slavery and racial oppression and that's fine. That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. But you asked a question and I answered it.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Do you really expect an answer to that stupid shit. Can you tell me why she couldn't answer TI's question.

Why she could or could not answer the question in the video is irrelevant. You consider her a bootlicker because she chose a political viewpoint that you don't agree with, not because of her behavior in a video.

You would have called her a bootlicker anyway with or without the video. Tell me I'm wrong.

She said she was going to answer the question, so it is relevant as hell. With that said why couldn't she answer the question?

It's not relevant at all for three reasons: 1) That video is not the one this thread is about. Everyone was commenting on the video that this discussion IS about and then you jumped in - addressing no one in particular and completely off topic - to ask a question about a totally unrelated video.

2) It is not why you consider her a bootlicker and in fact I'm betting you thought so before either of these videos.

3) You called her a "bootlicking Tom" in response to MAGAman's comment that she was the "full package", not because of the video you linked. The video you linked has nothing to do with this discussion.

By the way, I've seen the video and in fact I talked about it in another thread recently and I'll tell you what I told them: She couldn't answer because the dipshit that asked her the question wouldn't stop interrupting her.
That's not how you properly conduct a debate or discussion. When he asked her the question he should have shut the fuck up and let her answer. Every time she tried to speak he would interrupt her again when she started saying something he didn't like with "WHICH PERIOD WAS GREAT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REPLICATE! WHICH ERA WAS IT!"

If she's going to flounder, let her do it on her own. Shouting your opponent down is a cheap tactic meant to make your opponent look like they're floundering. This TI person is a fucking idiot.

What era is she talking about?

Just can't let it go, huh? Alright, I will answer the question for you that TI wouldn't let Owens answer, even though he's the one who asked her.

The period they're referring to is the first half of the twentieth century, especially the period right after WWII. It was during this time that the U.S. was at its height in prosperity. We were also trailblazers and innovators in just about every domain: medical; military; technology; industrial; engineering; science; manufacturing, etc., etc.

You can choose to think that, like this TI idiot and many others, that America was never great because of slavery and racial oppression and that's fine. That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. But you asked a question and I answered it.

So you mean making White America Great Again, because that era damn sure wasn't great for black folks and that isn't no damn opinion chief. So the idiot is dumb ass fools like you who try to tell black folks that things were great for everyone in those days.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

You mean there was no answer the idiot could give, because it wasn't one.

Nope. Not what I mean, but your lies are duly noted.

What era are you Trump Humpers talking about?

More of your obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.....

What era Trump Humper?

You really should ask a professional about that obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.......

Do you love being a Trump Humper?

 

[Nostra]

Nope. Not what I mean, but your lies are duly noted.

What era are you Trump Humpers talking about?

More of your obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.....

What era Trump Humper?

You really should ask a professional about that obsession with humping Trump.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.......

Do you love being a Trump Humper?

Seek help.

 

[Nostra]

Why she could or could not answer the question in the video is irrelevant. You consider her a bootlicker because she chose a political viewpoint that you don't agree with, not because of her behavior in a video.

You would have called her a bootlicker anyway with or without the video. Tell me I'm wrong.

She said she was going to answer the question, so it is relevant as hell. With that said why couldn't she answer the question?

It's not relevant at all for three reasons: 1) That video is not the one this thread is about. Everyone was commenting on the video that this discussion IS about and then you jumped in - addressing no one in particular and completely off topic - to ask a question about a totally unrelated video.

2) It is not why you consider her a bootlicker and in fact I'm betting you thought so before either of these videos.

3) You called her a "bootlicking Tom" in response to MAGAman's comment that she was the "full package", not because of the video you linked. The video you linked has nothing to do with this discussion.

By the way, I've seen the video and in fact I talked about it in another thread recently and I'll tell you what I told them: She couldn't answer because the dipshit that asked her the question wouldn't stop interrupting her.
That's not how you properly conduct a debate or discussion. When he asked her the question he should have shut the fuck up and let her answer. Every time she tried to speak he would interrupt her again when she started saying something he didn't like with "WHICH PERIOD WAS GREAT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REPLICATE! WHICH ERA WAS IT!"

If she's going to flounder, let her do it on her own. Shouting your opponent down is a cheap tactic meant to make your opponent look like they're floundering. This TI person is a fucking idiot.

What era is she talking about?

Just can't let it go, huh? Alright, I will answer the question for you that TI wouldn't let Owens answer, even though he's the one who asked her.

The period they're referring to is the first half of the twentieth century, especially the period right after WWII. It was during this time that the U.S. was at its height in prosperity. We were also trailblazers and innovators in just about every domain: medical; military; technology; industrial; engineering; science; manufacturing, etc., etc.

You can choose to think that, like this TI idiot and many others, that America was never great because of slavery and racial oppression and that's fine. That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. But you asked a question and I answered it.

So you mean making White America Great Again, because that era damn sure wasn't great for black folks and that isn't no damn opinion chief. So the idiot is dumb ass fools like you who try to tell black folks that things were great for everyone in those days.

Why are you still here?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

She said she was going to answer the question, so it is relevant as hell. With that said why couldn't she answer the question?

It's not relevant at all for three reasons: 1) That video is not the one this thread is about. Everyone was commenting on the video that this discussion IS about and then you jumped in - addressing no one in particular and completely off topic - to ask a question about a totally unrelated video.

2) It is not why you consider her a bootlicker and in fact I'm betting you thought so before either of these videos.

3) You called her a "bootlicking Tom" in response to MAGAman's comment that she was the "full package", not because of the video you linked. The video you linked has nothing to do with this discussion.

By the way, I've seen the video and in fact I talked about it in another thread recently and I'll tell you what I told them: She couldn't answer because the dipshit that asked her the question wouldn't stop interrupting her.
That's not how you properly conduct a debate or discussion. When he asked her the question he should have shut the fuck up and let her answer. Every time she tried to speak he would interrupt her again when she started saying something he didn't like with "WHICH PERIOD WAS GREAT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO REPLICATE! WHICH ERA WAS IT!"

If she's going to flounder, let her do it on her own. Shouting your opponent down is a cheap tactic meant to make your opponent look like they're floundering. This TI person is a fucking idiot.

What era is she talking about?

Just can't let it go, huh? Alright, I will answer the question for you that TI wouldn't let Owens answer, even though he's the one who asked her.

The period they're referring to is the first half of the twentieth century, especially the period right after WWII. It was during this time that the U.S. was at its height in prosperity. We were also trailblazers and innovators in just about every domain: medical; military; technology; industrial; engineering; science; manufacturing, etc., etc.

You can choose to think that, like this TI idiot and many others, that America was never great because of slavery and racial oppression and that's fine. That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. But you asked a question and I answered it.

So you mean making White America Great Again, because that era damn sure wasn't great for black folks and that isn't no damn opinion chief. So the idiot is dumb ass fools like you who try to tell black folks that things were great for everyone in those days.

Why are you still here?

Because I can.