When you lose Candace Owens.....

Candace Owens is a fucking idiot who happens to be a black woman.
Yes. That's what I've been saying. She was adopted by whites on the right while she spoke against other black people. But now she has spoken against white Jews, and the same Jews that supported her while she dissed backs, ie Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, etc.., have kicked her to the curb.
 
Yes. That's what I've been saying. She was adopted by whites on the right while she spoke against other black people. But now she has spoken against white Jews, and the same Jews that supported her while she dissed backs, ie Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, etc.., have kicked her to the curb.
She was a Conservative Darling , now she is a anti Populist Firebrand
 
In other words? Hardly. In your words, maybe!

Not in Media Bias/Fact Check's words. (which you conveniently neglected to post a link to. I can see why)

Overall, we rate the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) as Right-Center biased due to its strong advocacy for free speech, selective criticism of progressive policies, and funding from primarily right-leaning foundations. We rate them High for factual reporting based on proper sourcing, transparent operations, and lack of failed fact checks.


Here's my words: When the left is predominantly engaged in free speech suppression, then being an advocate of free speech like FIRE will make you seem like a rightie.
Your words ignore the right wing suppression of free speech to whine about Harvard's refusal to accept hate speech.
 
Yes. That's what I've been saying. She was adopted by whites on the right while she spoke against other black people. But now she has spoken against white Jews, and the same Jews that supported her while she dissed backs, ie Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, etc.., have kicked her to the curb.
The way I see it as an ignorant cock Asian, Owens is a detriment to black people. And I really like black people. So she can fuck all the way off with her political rhetoric about her race.
 
Your words ignore the right wing suppression of free speech to whine about Harvard's refusal to accept hate speech.
That sentence literally makes no sense whatsoever.

Harvard is free to suppress any speech it likes, as long as it does not violate existing laws. And the federal government is free to not subsidize said suppression with tax dollars.

Win win.

Is not subsidizing suppression of speech itself a suppression of speech? No.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom