Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's my observation that most people who see themselves as moral aren't. It's the dunning effect thingee.
By the way, in christianity this symbol was preserved, though only as a "polytheistic" heritage, like many other revered saints. This is Saint George,They were Christian fascists and wore God is with us on their belt buckles.
They would not want a symbol that shows Loyal Opposition.
Fascist systems do not allow for any real opposition.
Black sheeple are slaughtered first.
I have yet to have a Christian speak to this link.So now that we've firmly established who actually is knowledgeable on the subject at hand...
Most of the nutty stuff in horrible accusations and in favor of the religious beliefs are actually those who are acting in complete ignorance.
So, is it possible? Can you truly be rational, respect science, yet be a true believer?
I am not sure what you mean, by preserved, but not in a respectful way in a huge sense.By the way, in christianity this symbol was preserved, though only as a "polytheistic" heritage, like many other revered saints. This is Saint George,
and besides, there are these motives in the image of a leviathan
I have yet to have a Christian speak to this link.
That is why I can know for a fact that they are not following their moral sense, holding their noses and choosing to let their filthy religion ride.
Regards
DL
When the church came to other nations, it left the old attributes, changing its meaning. There are many such eastern atavisms. For the first time, the cult of revered saints was introduced by the Zoroastrians, they had the Yazygs, the old Aryan gods, who began to obey Ahura Mazda. The Christians did the same.I am not sure what you mean, by preserved,
Ridiculous, you seem to be chasing ghosts and phantasms.Almost all the epithets of Yahweh's opponents carry the semantics of the ancient heavenly gods. Satan apparently descended from Set, the sun god of Egypt, Lucifer means the luminiferous, the "Devil" comes from heaven's aryan "Dev". The horned image of the devil is copied from Saman, the Celtic analogue of the heavenly god of the Aryans in the form of a bull, the good god of the Celts.
And the opposite is also true. "God" from "Hades", underground serpentine king, Slavic version of "Bog" is also identical to Sanskrit "Bhoga"(Serpent)
There cannot be so many coincidences by chance. In any case, the inversion of the horned god Saman is an exact fact, it was written by a scientist who studied the culture of medieval witches, it was their godRidiculous, you seem to be chasing ghosts and phantasms.
The Bible says that Satan appeared to Jesus and tempted Him, such as Satan said turn these stones into bread. Then Satan took Jesus to the top of the Temple, and dared him to jump off. That was not a philosophic debate, it was a struggle between two living being.To be precise, 31% of Christians take the Bible literally, down from 38% in the 1970s when there was a big Evangelical push that everyone take the Bible literally. Fact: Over 60% of Christians never took the Bible literally. What I find irrational is atheists arguing with a minority belief over stories instead of philosophies.
Wouldn't it be more rational for atheists to argue over the philosophies--i.e., the Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes, Wisdom, etc.? Also, most Biblical references to Satan (HaSatan) reference temptation or a Tempter. In other words, in most cases, temptation is personified. Both in the desert and with Peter, Jesus insisted that these temptations get behind him.
I have read enough current studies on possession that there do seem to be rare cases of demon possession. The interesting part of these various studies make the observation that in the rare, true cases the person does, in some way, invite Satan (or demon) to enter within.
What is irrational for atheists disdaining Bible stories is that they never see past the setting to the purpose--which is the lessons or moral--of that story. They argue with the minority, truly a case of the blind leading the blind.
I love to think about the stars, and astronomy is a great science, where in the world did you come up with that?This is all indirectly confirmed by the fact that Christian rhetoric has always been directed against astronomy, they burned scientists studying the sky and their works, and in general, the Abrahamic religions pay very little attention to heavenly issues.
there is a lot of evidence of this, read, for example, about the burning of the Alexandrian library and killing the astronomer HypatiaI love to think about the stars, and astronomy is a great science, where in the world did you come up with that?
I'm talking about the written language developed by the first Chinese dynasty about 4000 years ago.Nope... mandarin is Fairly old but it's a "johnny come lately" by comparison.
At any rate China and Egypt weren't exactly buddies either. They didn't know about each other.
When the Hebrews/Apiru started their own written language it was the trendiest and most novel thing for any nation to do. Considered to be a waste of time and resources by most cultures.
But nobody writes Egyptian or Phonetian today. Hebrew is the national language of Israel. And Farci today bears no resemblance to Aramaic. Just saying.
Follow the direction of reading...left to right or right to left....it all centers on Israel.
You see yourself as moral, right?Your way of observing is retarded, but anytime you find the balls to advocate for the Christian theology from a moral standpoint, I am here for all of you moral cowards.
Pick your issue from you sucking on Jesus' dick for salvation to your love of a genocidal moral monster.
Regards
DL
Egyptian wasn't the first but it's around 6,000 years old...Hebrew is around 5600 years old.I'm talking about the written language developed by the first Chinese dynasty about 4000 years ago.
Because it's outlandish and disrespectful by just the title alone.
Meaning you just want to argue...and nobody really wants to engage with you because of that...what's the point?
Misogyny is a lieI drip with anti-Christian hate when I see them preaching for homophobia and misogyny, while the law of the land seeks to have equality for all.
If you do not hate them for that, you are not much of a moral person.
Regards
DL
I love to think about the stars, and astronomy is a great science, where in the world did you come up with that?
